Nevada Revised Statutes
Nev. Rev. Stat. § 641C.900 (2026)
Unlawful to engage in practice of counseling persons with alcohol and other substance use disorders, clinical practice of counseling persons with alcohol and other substance use disorders or practice of counseling persons with an addictive disorder related to gambling without being licensed or certified
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
NRSleg.state.nv.us (official)
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
NRS 641C.900 Unlawful to engage in practice of counseling persons with
alcohol and other substance use disorders, clinical practice of counseling
persons with alcohol and other substance use disorders or practice of
counseling persons with an addictive disorder related to gambling without being
licensed or certified. A person
shall not engage in the practice of counseling persons with alcohol and other
substance use disorders, the clinical practice of counseling persons with
alcohol and other substance use disorders or the practice of counseling persons
with an addictive disorder related to gambling unless the person is a licensed
counselor, certified counselor or certified intern.
(Added to NRS by 1999, 3054; A 2003, 1422; 2007, 3072; 2015, 2277)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4
cases, 2016–2016 · leading case: Goodwin v. Jones, 368 P.3d 763 (Nev. 2016).
Goodwin v. Jones, 368 P.3d 763 (Nev. 2016). “NRS 641C.900; NRS 641C.950. Thus, if Goodwin's job duties required her to practice counseling, and she engaged in any counseling whatsoever, then the law required her to maintain her intern certification or to obtain counselor certification.”
Goodwin v. Jones, 2016 NV 12 (Nev. 2016). “Thus, if Goodwin's job duties required her to practice counseling, and she engaged in any counseling whatsoever, then the law required her to maintain her intern certification or to obtain counselor certification. See NRS 641C.”
Goodwin Vs. Jones, 2016 NV 12 (Nev. 2016). “See NRS 641C.900; NRS 641C.950. The appeals referee concluded that Bristlecone's employment policy required Goodwin to maintain her certification.”
Goodwin Vs. Jones, 2016 NV 12 (Nev. 2016). “See NRS 641C.900; NRS 641C.950. The appeals referee concluded that Bristlecone's employment policy required Goodwin to maintain her certification.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.