Nevada Revised Statutes

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 645.280 (2026)

Association with or compensation of unlicensed broker, broker-salesperson or salesperson unlawful; payment of commission other than through broker or owner-developer unlawful

✓ laws through the 2025 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NRSleg.state.nv.us (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
NRS 645.280  Association with or compensation of unlicensed broker, broker-salesperson or salesperson unlawful; payment of commission other than through broker or owner-developer unlawful.

      1.  It is unlawful for any licensed real estate broker, or broker-salesperson or salesperson to offer, promise, allow, give or pay, directly or indirectly, any part or share of his or her commission, compensation or finder’s fee arising or accruing from any real estate transaction to any person who is not a licensed real estate broker, broker-salesperson or salesperson, in consideration of services performed or to be performed by the unlicensed person. A licensed real estate broker may pay a commission to a licensed broker of another state.

      2.  A real estate broker-salesperson or salesperson shall not be associated with or accept compensation from any person other than the broker or owner-developer under whom he or she is licensed at the time of the real estate transaction.

      3.  It is unlawful for any licensed real estate broker-salesperson or salesperson to pay a commission to any person except through the broker or owner-developer under whom he or she is licensed at the time of the real estate transaction.

      [26:150:1947; 1943 NCL § 6396.26]—(NRS A 1959, 394; 1975, 1542; 1979, 1538; 1985, 1263; 2005, 1286)

     

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1963–1973 · leading case: Randono v. Nevada Real Est. Comm'n, 379 P.2d 537 (Nev. 1963).
Randono v. Nevada Real Est. Comm'n, 379 P.2d 537 (Nev. 1963). · cites it 2× “The real estate licenses of Randono were revoked because of the finding by the Commission that he had violated Subsection 2 of NRS 645.280, Subsection 2 of NRS 645.310, and Subsections 5, 6, 7, 18, and 19 of NRS 645.”
Beggs v. Lowe, 516 P.2d 467 (Nev. 1973). · cites it 2× “280 may be read to authorize the voluntary payment of a commission to a licensed broker of another state, it does not grant to such out-of-state licensed broker the right to resort to the courts of Nevada to collect money allegedly owing him.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.