Nev. Rev. Stat. » NRS: CHAPTER 646 - PAWNBROKERS
Nevada Revised Statutes

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 646.030 (2026)

Reports of transactions and suspected stolen property to sheriffs and chiefs of police

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NRSleg.state.nv.us (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
NRS 646.030  Reports of transactions and suspected stolen property to sheriffs and chiefs of police.

      1.  Every pawnbroker doing business in any unincorporated town shall, before 12 m. of each day, furnish in duplicate to the sheriff of the county a full, true and correct transcript of the record of all transactions had on the preceding day.

      2.  Every pawnbroker doing business in any incorporated city shall, before 12 m. of each day, furnish in duplicate to the chief of police thereof, a full, true and correct transcript of the record of all transactions had on the preceding day.

      3.  Every pawnbroker doing business in an unincorporated town or in an incorporated city having good cause to believe that any property in his or her possession has been previously lost or stolen shall forthwith report such fact to the sheriff or chief of police, respectively, together with the name of the owner if known, and the date when, and the name of the person from whom, the same was received by the pawnbroker.

      [1911 C&P § 202; A 1917, 410; 1919 RL § 6467; NCL § 10150]—(NRS A 1967, 178)

     

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1966–2006 · leading case: In Re Schwalb, 347 B.R. 726 (Bankr. D. Nev. 2006).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
In Re Schwalb, 347 B.R. 726 (Bankr. D. Nev. 2006). “§ 646.030. Of all the sections in Chapter 646, only one — Section 646.”
Islandia, Inc. v. Marechek, 420 P.2d 5 (Nev. 1966). · cites it 2× “on who, for another, in consideration of compensation by fee, commission, salary or otherwise, or with the intention or expectation of receiving compensation, does, offers or attempts or agrees to do, engages in, or offers or attempts or *427 agrees to engage in, either directly…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.