Nev. Rev. Stat. » NRS: CHAPTER 706 - MOTOR CARRIERS
Nevada Revised Statutes

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 706.8819 (2026)

Hearings and final decisions; jurisdiction; appeals from final decisions; judicial review

✓ laws through the 2025 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NRSleg.state.nv.us (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
NRS 706.8819  Hearings and final decisions; jurisdiction; appeals from final decisions; judicial review.

      1.  The Taxicab Authority shall conduct hearings and make final decisions in the following matters:

      (a) Applications to adjust, alter or change the rates, charges or fares for taxicab service;

      (b) Applications for certificates of public convenience and necessity to operate a taxicab service;

      (c) Applications requesting authority to transfer any existing interest in a certificate of public convenience and necessity or in a corporation that holds a certificate of public convenience and necessity to operate a taxicab business;

      (d) Applications to change the total number of allocated taxicabs in a county to which NRS 706.881 to 706.885, inclusive, apply; and

      (e) Appeals from final decisions of the Administrator made pursuant to NRS 706.8822.

      2.  Any final decision of the Taxicab Authority pursuant to this section is subject to judicial review pursuant to NRS 233B.130.

      (Added to NRS by 1969, 1241; A 1977, 746; 1991, 1960; 1997, 1955; 2015, 2601)

Taxicab Administrator

     

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 1976–1976 · leading case: State ex rel. List v. Mirin, 553 P.2d 966 (Nev. 1976).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State ex rel. List v. Mirin, 553 P.2d 966 (Nev. 1976). · cites it 3× “NRS 706.8819(2). 6 The Legislature has also empowered Authority to allocate the number of taxicabs among the certificate holders.”
Nev. Rev. Stat. § 706.8819(2): 1 case
State ex rel. List v. Mirin, 553 P.2d 966 (Nev. 1976). “NRS 706.8819(2). 6 The Legislature has also empowered Authority to allocate the number of taxicabs among the certificate holders.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.