NRS
86.151 Filing requirements.
1. One or more persons may form a
limited-liability company by signing and filing with the Secretary of State
articles of organization for the company.
2. Upon the filing of the articles of
organization with the Secretary of State and the payment of the required filing
fees, the Secretary of State shall issue to the company a certificate that the
articles, containing the required statement of facts, have been filed.
3. A signer of the articles of
organization or a manager designated in the articles does not thereby become a
member of the company. Except as otherwise provided in NRS 86.491, at all times after commencement
of business by the company, the company must have one or more members. The
filing of the articles does not, by itself, constitute commencement of business
by the company.
(Added to NRS by 1991,
1293; A 1993,
1012; 1995,
1126, 2107;
1997,
715; 1999,
1611; 2003,
3136; 2007,
2669; 2013,
1276)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
4
cases (
1 in the last 5 years), 2012–2024 · leading case:
Weddell v. H2O, INC., 271 P.3d 743 (Nev. 2012).
Weddell v. H2O, INC., 271 P.3d 743 (Nev. 2012).
“NRS 86.151; NRS 86.201. An LLC may, but is not required to, adopt an operating agreement, NRS 86.”
Plyam v. Precision Dev., LLC (In Re Plyam), 530 B.R. 456 (B.A.P. 9th Cir. 2015).
“See Nev.Rev.Stat. § 86.151(l)(a) (2003). Such document may or may not establish that a trust relationship existed between Yuri and Precision.”
City Bay Capital LLC v. BH&G Holdings, LLC, No. 2:21-cv-01790 (D. Nev. Mar. 22, 2024).
· cites it 4× “” Nev. Rev. Stat. § 86.151 . The Court also 17 finds it highly significant that it was Melero himself who filed for a name change with the Secretary 18 of State five months later, changing the name of “HIS Capital Group Tuscany” to “HIS Capital 19 Group Holdings.”
In re Yuri Plyam & Natalia Plyam, No. CC-14-1362-TaDPa (B.A.P. 9th Cir. May 5, 2015).
“25 See Nev. Rev. Stat. § 86.151 (1)(a) (2003). Such document may or 26 27 13 In Nevada, “[a] limited-liability company may, but is not required to, adopt an operating agreement.”
Nev. Rev. Stat. § 86.151(l)(a): 1 case
Plyam v. Precision Dev., LLC (In Re Plyam), 530 B.R. 456 (B.A.P. 9th Cir. 2015).
“See Nev.Rev.Stat. § 86.151(l)(a) (2003). Such document may or may not establish that a trust relationship existed between Yuri and Precision.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.