Nevada Revised Statutes

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 86.490 (2026)

Dissolution before commencement of business; limitations

✓ laws through the 2025 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NRSleg.state.nv.us (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
NRS 86.490  Dissolution before commencement of business; limitations.

      1.  Before the commencement of business by any limited-liability company where management is vested in one or more managers and where no member’s interest in the limited-liability company has been issued, at least two-thirds of the organizers or the managers of the limited-liability company may dissolve the limited-liability company by filing with the Secretary of State articles of dissolution to dissolve the limited-liability company.

      2.  Any articles of dissolution filed with the Secretary of State pursuant to subsection 1 must state that:

      (a) The management of the limited-liability company is vested in one or more managers;

      (b) The limited-liability company has not commenced business; and

      (c) No member’s interest in the limited-liability company has been issued.

      (Added to NRS by 2007, 2424; A 2025, 808)

     

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 2014–2014 · leading case: In re Go Global, Inc., No. NV-12-1596-JuKiKu (B.A.P. 9th Cir. Jan. 13, 2014).
In re Go Global, Inc., No. NV-12-1596-JuKiKu (B.A.P. 9th Cir. Jan. 13, 2014). · cites it 3× “Again, Appellants do not contend that 14 they did not owe Go Global fiduciary duties; rather, they assert 15 that Paulson did not breach those duties because he complied 16 with NRS 86.490(1). Specifically, at the time of the 17 dissolution, Paulson held 40% interest and both…”
Nev. Rev. Stat. § 86.490(1): 1 case
In re Go Global, Inc., No. NV-12-1596-JuKiKu (B.A.P. 9th Cir. Jan. 13, 2014). “Again, Appellants do not contend that 14 they did not owe Go Global fiduciary duties; rather, they assert 15 that Paulson did not breach those duties because he complied 16 with NRS 86.490(1). Specifically, at the time of the 17 dissolution, Paulson held 40% interest and both…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.