N.H. Rev. Stat. Ann. » N.H. Rev. Stat. Ann. / Title xxi / Chapter 263
New Hampshire Revised Statutes

N.H. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 263:63 (2024)

Driving Without Giving Proof

✓ 2024 N.H. RSA (Justia copy): later sessions are not included
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NH-GCgc.nh.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
    263:63 Driving Without Giving Proof. – Any person whose driver's license or registration certificates or other privilege to drive a vehicle has been suspended or revoked, restoration thereof or the issuance of a new license or registration being contingent upon the furnishing of security or proof of financial responsibility, and who during such suspension or revocation or in the absence of full authorization from the director, shall drive any vehicle upon any way or knowingly permit any such vehicle owned by him to be driven by another upon any way, except as permitted hereunder, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor if a natural person, or guilty of a felony if any other person.

Source. 1937, 161:25. RL 122:24. RSA 268:25. 1973, 528:152. 1981, 146:1, eff. Jan. 1, 1982.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1984–1990 · leading case: State v. Goding, 513 A.2d 325 (N.H. 1986).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. Goding, 513 A.2d 325 (N.H. 1986). “The State entered nolle prosequi on the two district court complaints, and brought two informations charging the defendant with DWI-second offense and driving without proof of financial responsibility, RSA 263:63. At a May 1983 jury trial in Superior Court (Contas, J.”
State v. Goding, 474 A.2d 580 (N.H. 1984). “The defendant was charged with driving while intoxicated, second offense, RSA 265:82, and with driving without proof of financial responsibility in violation of RSA 263:63. After a jury trial in Superior Court (Contas, J.”
State v. Leary, 573 A.2d 135 (N.H. 1990). “1989), operating without proof of financial responsibility, RSA 263:63, and simple assault, RSA 631:2-a.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.