New Hampshire Revised Statutes
N.H. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 265:67 (2024)
Charging Violations and Rule in Civil Actions
✓ 2024 N.H. RSA (Justia copy): later sessions are not included
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
NH-GCgc.nh.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
265:67 Charging Violations and Rule in Civil Actions. –
I. In every charge of violation of any speed regulation in this chapter the complaint shall set forth the manner in which the alleged speed was unreasonable and imprudent or shall specify the speed at which the defendant is alleged to have driven and the prima facie speed applicable within the district or at the location.
II. The provision of this chapter declaring prima facie speed limitations shall not be construed to relieve the plaintiff in any action from the burden of proving negligence on the part of the defendant as the proximate cause of an accident.
I. In every charge of violation of any speed regulation in this chapter the complaint shall set forth the manner in which the alleged speed was unreasonable and imprudent or shall specify the speed at which the defendant is alleged to have driven and the prima facie speed applicable within the district or at the location.
II. The provision of this chapter declaring prima facie speed limitations shall not be construed to relieve the plaintiff in any action from the burden of proving negligence on the part of the defendant as the proximate cause of an accident.
Source. RSA 262-A:60. 1963, 330:1. 1965, 80:1. 1981, 146:1, eff. Jan. 1, 1982.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1
case, 2003–2003 · leading case: Nilsson v. Bierman, 839 A.2d 25 (N.H. 2003).
Nilsson v. Bierman, 839 A.2d 25 (N.H. 2003). “RSA 265:67, II The defendant next contends that the court’s instructions conflict with RSA 265:67, II (1993), which states that prima facie speed limits “shall not be construed to relieve the plaintiff in any action from the burden of proving negligence on the part of the…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.