N.H. Rev. Stat. Ann. » N.H. Rev. Stat. Ann. / Title lxiv / Chapter 677
New Hampshire Revised Statutes

N.H. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 677:11 (2024)

Judgment

✓ 2024 N.H. RSA (Justia copy): later sessions are not included
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NH-GCgc.nh.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
    677:11 Judgment. – The final judgment upon every appeal shall be a decree dismissing the appeal, or vacating the order or decision complained of in whole or in part, as the case may be; but, in case such order or decision is wholly or partly vacated, the court may also, in its discretion, remand the matter to the zoning board of adjustment or local legislative body for such further proceedings, not inconsistent with the decree, as justice may require.

Source. 1983, 447:1, eff. Jan. 1, 1984.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 1986–2020 · leading case: Kalil v. Town of Dummer Zoning Bd. of Adjustment, 922 A.2d 672 (N.H. 2007).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Kalil v. Town of Dummer Zoning Bd. of Adjustment, 922 A.2d 672 (N.H. 2007). · cites it 3× “Furthermore, RSA 677:11 (1996) provides: The final judgment upon every appeal shall be a decree dismissing the appeal, or vacating the order or decision complained of in whole or in part, as the case may be; but, in case such order or decision is wholly or partly vacated, the…”
Kalil v. Town of Dummer Zoning Bd., 922 A.2d 672 (N.H. 2007). · cites it 3× “Furthermore, RSA 677:11 (1996) provides: The final judgment upon every appeal shall be a decree dismissing the appeal, or vacating the order or decision complained of in whole or in part, as the case may be; but, in case such order or decision is wholly or partly vacated, the…”
Bartlett v. City of Manchester, 62 A.3d 855 (N.H. 2013). “See RSA 677:11 (2008) (when vacating ZBA decision trial court may remand to the ZBA or local legislative body for further proceedings); Kalil v.”
Munger v. Town of Exeter, 512 A.2d 418 (N.H. 1986). “2d 101, 106 (1984), and we remand with instructions to vacate the decision of the town meeting, RSA 677:11 (Supp. 1983). Reversed and remanded.”
Bellevue Props., Inc. v. Town of Conway, No. 2019-0475 (N.H. Apr. 2, 2020). “See RSA 677:11 (2016). Upon remand, the board held another public hearing and addressed the trial court’s concerns regarding parking in three independent ways: (1) it waived the town’s regulation establishing a required number of parking spaces; (2) it found that, because the…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.