New Jersey Statutes
N.J. Stat. § 12A:2-315 (2026)
Implied warranty: fitness for particular purpose
✓ laws through the 2025 session (retrieved May 2026)
Where the seller at the time of contracting has reason to know any particular purpose for which the goods are required and that the buyer is relying on the seller's skill or judgment to select or furnish suitable goods, there is unless excluded or modified under the next section an implied warranty that the goods shall be fit for such purpose.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 25
cases (8 in the last 5 years), 1979–2025 · leading case: Lithuanian Com. Corp. v. Sara Lee Hosiery, 219 F. Supp. 2d 600 (D.N.J. 2002).
Lithuanian Com. Corp. v. Sara Lee Hosiery, 219 F. Supp. 2d 600 (D.N.J. 2002). “Thus, I shall grant Sara Lee’s Rule 50 motion on LCC’s claim for breach of warranty for a particular purpose, N.J. Stat. Ann. § 12A:2-315, and deny the motion in all other respects.”
Crozier v. Johnson & Johnson Consum. Companies, Inc., 901 F. Supp. 2d 494 (D.N.J. 2012). “*509 N.J. Stat. Ann. § 12A:2-314. Plaintiffs also allege that J & J has violated the implied warranty of fitness for particular purpose, pursuant to N.”
In re Rust-Oleum Restore Mktg., Sales Practices & Prods. Liab. Litig., 155 F. Supp. 3d 772 (N.D. Ill. 2016). “§ 382-A:2-315; N.J. Stat. § 12A:2-315; N.Y. U.C.C. Law § 2-315 ; N.”
Volin v. Gen. Elec. Co., 189 F. Supp. 3d 411 (D.N.J. 2016). “An implied warranty of fitness for a particular purpose is created “[w]here the seller at the time of contracting has reason to know any particular purpose for which the goods' are required and that the buyer is relying on the seller’s skill or judgment to select or furnish…”
Unifoil Corp. v. Cheque Printers & Encoders Ltd., 622 F. Supp. 268 (D.N.J. 1985). “The Uniform Commercial Code, codified at N.J.S.A. § 12A:2-315, describes the implied warranty of fitness for a particular purpose in the following words: Where a seller at the time of contracting has reason to know any particular purpose for which the goods are required and that…”
Mendez v. Shah, 28 F. Supp. 3d 282 (D.N.J. 2014). “It states that “[w]here the seller at the time of contracting has reason to know any *294 particular purpose for which the goods are required and that the buyer is relying on the seller’s skill or judgment to select or furnish suitable goods, there is unless excluded or modified…”
New Jersey Transit Corp. v. Harsco Corp., 497 F.3d 323 (3d Cir. 2007). “N.J. Stat. Ann. § 12A:2-315. Section 12A:2-316, entitled “Exclusion or modification of warranties,” declares, in part, that: (2) Subject to subsection (3), to exclude or modify the implied warranty of merchantability or any part of it the language must mention merchantability…”
Oscar Mayer Corp. v. Mincing Trading Corp., 744 F. Supp. 79 (D.N.J. 1990). “N.J.Stat.Ann. § 12A:2-315 (West 1962); N.”
Chatlos Sys., Inc. v. Nat'l Cash Register Corp., 479 F. Supp. 738 (D.N.J. 1979). “Under N.J.S.A. 12A:2-315 an implied warranty of fitness for a particular purpose is created: Where a seller at the time of contracting has reason to know of any particular purpose for which the goods are required and has reason to know that the buyer is relying oil the seller’s…”
Lithuanian Com. Corp. v. Sara Lee Hosiery, 179 F.R.D. 450 (D.N.J. 1998). “” See N.J.S.A. 12A:2-315. Sara Lee points to the statutory exemption from these warranties based upon the buyer’s inspection of a sample.”
Campione v. Soden, 695 A.2d 1364 (N.J. 1997). “1143 East Jersey, the building owner that claimed damages when a waterproofing paint peeled from the sides of its building, pleaded breach of implied warranty, but no party requested the court to submit questions to the jury about whether there had been a breach, pursuant to…”
Satellites v. Home2US Commc'ns, Inc., 9 F. Supp. 3d 459 (D.N.J. 2014). “]” N.J.S.A. 12A:2-315 (emphasis added). The .”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.