3. Compulsory automobile insurance coverage; limits. Except as provided by section 4 of P.L.1998, c.21 (C.39:6A-3.1), every owner or registered owner of an automobile registered or principally garaged in this State shall maintain automobile liability insurance coverage, under provisions approved by the Commissioner of Banking and Insurance, insuring against loss resulting from liability imposed by law for bodily injury, death and property damage sustained by any person arising out of the ownership, maintenance, operation or use of an automobile wherein such coverage shall be at least in:
a. an amount or limit of $15,000.00 for plans issued or renewed prior to January 1, 2023, $25,000 for plans issued or renewed on or after January 1, 2023 but prior to January 1, 2026, and $35,000 for plans issued or renewed on or after January 1, 2026, exclusive of interest and costs, on account of injury to, or death of, one person, in any one accident; and
b. an amount or limit, subject to such limit for any one person so injured or killed, of $30,000.00 for plans issued or renewed prior to January 1, 2023, $50,000 for plans issued or renewed on or after January 1, 2023 but prior to January 1, 2026, and $70,000 for plans issued or renewed on or after January 1, 2026, exclusive of interest and costs, on account of injury to or death of, more than one person, in any one accident; and
c. an amount or limit of $25,000 for plans issued or renewed on or after January 1, 2023, exclusive of interest and costs, for damage to property in any one accident.
No licensed insurance carrier shall refuse to renew the required coverage stipulated by this act of an eligible person as defined in section 25 of P.L.1990, c.8 (C.17:33B-13) except in accordance with the provisions of section 26 of P.L.1988, c.119 (C.17:29C-7.1) or with the consent of the Commissioner of Banking and Insurance.
Notes of Decisions
Employers Ass'n of New Jersey v. State of NJ, 601 F. Supp. 232 (D.N.J. 1985).
· cites it 2× “Since 1973, New Jersey has required that every owner of an automobile registered or principally garaged in this state maintain liability coverage in specified minimum limits, N.J.Stat.Ann. § 39:6A-3 (West 1973); N.J.”
Borbely v. Nationwide Mut. Ins., 547 F. Supp. 959 (D.N.J. 1981).
“all during a period of 9 months from the effective date of such termination, upon request in writing of the terminated agent, renew all contracts of insurance for such agent for said company as may be in accordance with said company’s then current underwriting standards and pay…”
Oravsky v. Encompass Ins., 804 F. Supp. 2d 228 (D.N.J. 2011).
“A “[standard automobile insurance policy,” is expressly defined in the Act as “an automobile insurance policy with at least the coverage required pursuant to [N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3 (liability coverage) ] and [39:6A-4 (PIP coverage) ] and a “[bjasic automobile insurance policy,” is…”
Burlington Ins. Co. v. Northland Ins. Co., 766 F. Supp. 2d 515 (D.N.J. 2011).
“39:6B-1] or section 3 of [N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3] ... whenever the automobile or motor vehicle insured under the policy is used or operated in this State.”
In re Denby-Peterson, 576 B.R. 66 (Bankr. D.N.J. 2017).
“§ 39:6B-1, N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3. . Indeed it makes no sense to the court to require an immediate turnover of a vehicle only to have a creditor immediately turn around and file a stay relief motion due to a lack of adequate protection because of a lack of insurance especially when…”
Matter of Kent, 190 B.R. 196 (Bankr. D.N.J. 1995).
“at §§ 39:6A-3, -4, and -14 respectively, and mandated that every insurance company licensed to write insurance for private passenger automobiles in the State become a member of the New Jersey Automobile Insurance Risk Exchange (the “Exchange” or the “Risk Exchange”).”
Citizens United Reciprocal Exch. v. Perez, 75 A.3d 1233 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 2013).
“2d 1294 (2007) , that a standard auto insurance policy that was voided because it was fraudulently obtained should be reformed to provide the minimum $15,000/$30,000 liability coverage required by N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3 and 39:6B-1. Plaintiff CURE and amicus curiae, The Insurance…”
Prof'l Ins. Mgmt. v. Ohio Cas. Grp. of Ins. Companies, 246 B.R. 47 (D.N.J. 2000).
“The September 15, 1999 Opinion was effectuated by an October 14, 1999 Order which directed the turnover of commissions that accrued after April 1,1996 on policies renewing pursuant to N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3 through Ohio Casualty. The October 14, 1999 Bankruptcy Court Order provided as…”
N.J. Stat. § 39:6A-3(a): 2 cases
N.J. Stat. § 39:6A-3(b): 1 case
N.J. Stat. § 39:6A-3(c): 1 case
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.