New Jersey Statutes
N.J. Stat. § 58:10-23.11 (2026)
Short title
✓ laws through the 2025 session (retrieved May 2026)
This act shall be known and may be cited as the "Spill Compensation and Control Act."
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 135
cases (34 in the last 5 years), 1985–2026 · leading case: Interfaith Cmty. Org. v. Honeywell Int'l, Inc., 215 F. Supp. 2d 482 (D.N.J. 2002).
Interfaith Cmty. Org. v. Honeywell Int'l, Inc., 215 F. Supp. 2d 482 (D.N.J. 2002). “The Spill Act, N.J. Stat. Ann. §§ 58:10-23.11 through 58:10-23.”
Mattie Halley v. Honeywell Int'l Inc, 861 F.3d 481 (3d Cir. 2017). “The Court noted the settlement did not prevent class members from seeking remediation of their properties in the future through the administrative procedures of the New Jersey Spill Act, N.J.S.A. § 58:10-23.11, which require an entity who discharges a hazardous substance to…”
John Ross v. Karen A. Lowitz (074200), 120 A.3d 178 (N.J. 2015). “After the insurers remediated the contamination on the property, the lawsuit proceeded on the claims for damages against all defendants on theories of negligence, strict liability, private nuisance and trespass, as well as violations of the Spill Compensation and Control Act,…”
Nl Indus., Inc. v. State(076550), 156 A.3d 1043 (N.J. 2017). “In this appeal, the Court determines whether the New Jersey Spill Compensation and Control Act (Spill Act), N.J.S.A. 58:10-23.11 to -23.24, retroactively abrogated the State’s sovereign immunity for state action taken prior to the Act’s 1977 effective date.”
Litgo New Jersey Inc. v. Comm'r New Jersey Dep't of Env't Prot., 725 F.3d 369 (3d Cir. 2013). “The Litgo Appellants sought additional compensatory relief under the New Jersey Spill Compensation and Control Act (Spill Act), N.J. Stat. Ann. § 58:10-23.11 et seq., a statute that functions much like CERCLA, except that it permits parties to recover costs incurred because of…”
Cumberland Farms, Inc. v. New Jersey, 148 A.3d 767 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 2016). “Division's April 15, 2015 order dismissing its complaint seeking to enforce an alleged settlement with defendants New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection and the Administrator of the New Jersey Spill Compensation Fund (collectively "the DEP") that purportedly resolved…”
Nationwide Mut. Ins. v. Caris, 170 F. Supp. 3d 740 (D.N.J. 2016). “The underlying State court action followed alleging fraud, misrepresentation, intentional infliction of emotional distress, and breach of contract, among other claims, including a Spill Act claim for strict liability against the Ulaks pursuant to N.J. Stat. Ann. § 58:10-23.11 .…”
Interfaith Cmty. Org. v. Honeywell Int'l, Inc., 263 F. Supp. 2d 796 (D.N.J. 2003). “and ECARG seek to recover from Honeywell under the New Jersey Spill Compensation and Control Act (“Spill Act”), N.J.S.A. § 58:10-23.11 et seq., all “cleanup or removal costs” they have incurred, and may incur in the future, in connection with any discharges of chromium at the…”
N.J. Dep't of Envtl. Prot. v. Exxon Mobil Corp., 181 A.3d 257 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 2018). “In August 2004, DEP filed two complaints against Exxon seeking NRD at Bayway and Bayonne, and asserting claims under the Spill Compensation and Control Act, N.J.S.A. 58:10-23.11 to -23.24 *281 (Spill Act), and common law theories of public nuisance and trespass.”
Allied Corp. v. Frola, 701 F. Supp. 1084 (D.N.J. 1988). “Counts 13, 14 and 16 allege liability under the New Jersey Spill Compensation and Control Act (“Spill Act”), N.J.S.A. § 58:10-23.11 et seq. Count 17 seeks indemnification and contribution under the New Jersey Joint Tortfeasors Contribution Act, N.”
Bowen Eng'g v. Est. of Reeve, 799 F. Supp. 467 (D.N.J. 1992). “Reeve, through his estate, liable under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (“CERCLA”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 9601-9675 1 (Count One).”
Analytical Measurements, Inc. v. Keuffel & Esser Co., 843 F. Supp. 920 (D.N.J. 1993). “Azon’s Liability Plaintiff argues that Azon is liable under the Spill Compensation and Control Act, N.J.Stat.Ann. § 58:10-23.11 et seq., as a parent and successor corporation.”
N.J. Stat. § 58:10-23.11(b): 1 case
Mattie Halley v. Honeywell Int'l Inc, 861 F.3d 481 (3d Cir. 2017). “The Court noted the settlement did not prevent class members from seeking remediation of their properties in the future through the administrative procedures of the New Jersey Spill Act, N.J.S.A. § 58:10-23.11, which require an entity who discharges a hazardous substance to…”
N.J. Stat. § 58:10-23.11(c)(3): 1 case
Michael K. Furey v. Leonard Buck Trust (l-0332-18, Somerset Cnty. & Statewide), No. A-2242-20 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. July 21, 2022).
N.J. Stat. § 58:10-23.11(f)(a)(2): 1 case
North River Ins. Co. v. Carduner Front, LLC, No. A-3014-22 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. July 8, 2025).
N.J. Stat. § 58:10-23.11(i): 1 case
Woodland Private Study Grp. v. State of NJ, 616 F. Supp. 794 (D.N.J. 1985).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.