N.M. Stat. » Chapter 10 — Public Officers and Employees
New Mexico Statutes

N.M. Stat. § 10-7E-3 (2026)

Conflicts

✓ laws through the 2025 session (retrieved May 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NM-LEGnmonesource.com JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

In the event of conflict with other laws, the provisions of the Public Employee Bargaining Act shall supersede other previously enacted legislation and rules; provided that the Public Employee Bargaining Act shall not supersede the provisions of the Bateman Act [6-6-11 NMSA 1978], the Personnel Act [Chapter 10, Article 9 NMSA 1978], the Group Benefits Act [Chapter 10, Article 7B NMSA 1978], the Per Diem and Mileage Act [10-8-1 to 10-8-8 NMSA 1978], the Retiree Health Care Act [10-7C-1 to 10- 7C-16 NMSA 1978], public employee retirement laws or the Tort Claims Act [41-4-1 to 41-4-27 NMSA 1978].

History: Laws 2003, ch. 4, § 3; 2003, ch. 5, § 3; 2020, ch. 48, § 1.

ANNOTATIONS

The 2020 amendment, effective July 1, 2020, removed a provision providing that, in the event of a conflict, the provisions of the Public Employee Bargaining Act shall not supersede the provisions of Sections 10-7-1 through 10-7-19 NMSA 1978; after "legislation and", deleted "regulations" and added "rules"; and after "the Personnel Act", deleted "Sections 10-7-1 through 10-7-19 NMSA 1978".

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 2022–2024 · leading case: Autovest v. Agosto, 563 P.3d 811 (N.M. 2024).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Autovest v. Agosto, 563 P.3d 811 (N.M. 2024). · cites it 2× “{23} The absence of definitive language is even more noteworthy given the Legislature’s use of “supersede” and “notwithstanding” provisions throughout the UCC.”
AFSCME v. City of Espanola, No. A-1-CA-38804 (N.M. Ct. App. Jan. 19, 2022). · cites it 4× “First, the conflicts provision in the PEBA merely addresses “conflict[s] with other laws,” § 10-7E-3, and neither states nor infers that the PEBA is a revision of an entire area of law.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.