New Mexico Statutes

N.M. Stat. § 11-1-3 (2026)

Authority to enter into agreements; approval of the

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NM-LEGnmonesource.com JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
secretary of finance and administration required.
   If authorized by their legislative or other governing bodies, two or more public
agencies by agreement may jointly exercise any power common to the contracting
parties, even though one or more of the contracting parties may be located outside this
state; provided, however, nothing contained in this Joint Powers Agreements Act shall
authorize any state officer, board, commission, department or any other state agency,
institution or authority, or any county, municipality, public corporation or public district to
make any agreement without the approval of the secretary of finance and administration
as to the terms and conditions thereof. Joint powers agreements approved by the
secretary of finance and administration shall be reported to the state board of finance at
its next regularly scheduled public meeting. A list of the approved agreements shall be
filed with the office of the state board of finance and made a part of the minutes.

History: 1953 Comp., § 4-22-3, enacted by Laws 1961, ch. 135, § 3; 1977, ch. 128, § 2;
1983, ch. 301, § 24.

                                      ANNOTATIONS

The 1983 amendment, effective July 1, 1983, substituted "secretary of finance and
administration" for "director of the department of finance and administration" in the
catchline and in two places in the section.

Memorandum of understanding is not a joint powers agreement where it was not
executed by the livestock board in an open meeting, it did not violate the Joint Powers
Agreement Act, and it did not have to be approved by the secretary of the department of
finance and administration. Paragon Found., Inc. v. N.M. Livestock Bd., 2006-NMCA-
004, 138 N.M. 761, 126 P.3d 577, cert. denied, 2006-NMCERT-001, 139 N.M. 272, 131
P.3d 659.

Agreements with federal government. — Members of water commission had
authority under the Joint Powers Agreement Act to form the commission and contract
with the United States bureau of reclamation for the acquisition of a water supply; the
members' "common authority" existed under 72-14-28 NMSA 1978. San Juan Water
Comm'n v. Taxpayers & Water Users of San Juan County, 1993-NMSC-050, 116 N.M.
106, 860 P.2d 748.

Not applicable to gaming compacts with Indian tribes. — The governor is not a
"public agency" within the meaning of the Joint Powers Agreement Act and did not have
authority thereunder to enter into compacts and revenue-sharing agreements with
Indian tribes which would permit gaming on Indian lands pursuant to the federal Indian
Gaming Regulatory Act. State ex rel. Clark v. Johnson, 1995-NMSC-048, 120 N.M. 562,
904 P.2d 11.

Generally. — Formerly, this was the only statutory section which gave the state board
of finance specific control (now held by the secretary of finance and administration) over
a corporation which was authorized to operate a gas public utility system, and which
was jointly owned and jointly controlled by three cities. Other than those financial
matters which might possibly come before the board of finance, the major item
concerning the corporation which was subject to the control of the state board of finance
was the joint powers agreement creating such corporation. 1966 Op. Att'y Gen. No. 66-
07.

Constitutionality. — The appointment, under authority of the Joint Powers Agreements
Act, of a district judge to be chairman of a joint commission for consolidation of two
municipalities does not contravene the constitution. There is no incompatibility,
inconsistency or subordination, and no interference. The fact that some day an action of
the commission might be before a court was not enough to make the positions
incompatible. 1968 Op. Att'y Gen. No. 68-67.

Agreements with federal government. — The Joint Powers Agreements Act
authorizes agreements with the federal government of the type contemplated under 40
U.S.C. § 484 (now 40 U.S.C. §549). 1964 Op. Att'y Gen. No. 64-138.

Agreements relating to surplus property. — The state department of finance and
administration by broad general statutory provision has the authority to enter into
contractual agreements with the federal government, subject to approval of such
agreements by the state board of finance (now by the secretary of finance and
administration), for acquisition, administration and disposition of surplus property. 1964
Op. Att'y Gen. No. 64-138. (See now surplus property powers of the general services
department, 15-4-2 NMSA 1978.)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 8 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1993–2023 · leading case: State Ex Rel. Clark v. Johnson, 904 P.2d 11 (N.M. 1995).
State Ex Rel. Clark v. Johnson, 904 P.2d 11 (N.M. 1995). · cites it 3× “), authorizes any two or more public agencies by agreement to jointly exercise any power common to the contracting parties (§ 11-1-3), and defined “public agency” to include Indian tribes and the State of New Mexico or any department or agency thereof (§ 11 — 1—2(A)); and…”
San Juan Water Comm'n v. Taxpayers & Water Users, 860 P.2d 748 (N.M. 1993). · cites it 6× “Section 11-1-3 makes no mention of having to pass an ordinance, but instead requires only that a public agency, defined in Section 11-1-2(A), be authorized to do so.”
Paragon Found., Inc. v. State of New Mexico Livestock Bd., 2006 NMCA 004 (N.M. Ct. App. 2005). “§ 11-1-3 (citation omitted). {30} Under the set of facts that were presented to the district court, there was no basis for the JPAA claim.”
Gutierrez v. West Las Vegas Sch. Dist., 2002 NMCA 068 (N.M. Ct. App. 2002). · cites it 5× “” § 11-1-3. “Public agency” includes New Mexico educational institutions specified in N.”
Greentree Solid Waste Auth. v. Cnty. of Lincoln, 2016 NMCA 5 (N.M. Ct. App. 2015). · cites it 2× “]” Section 11-1-3. A “public agency” includes “a county, municipality, public corporation or public district of this state[.”
State ex rel. Educ. Assessments Sys., Inc. v. Coop. Educ. Servs. of New Mexico, Inc., 848 P.2d 1123 (N.M. Ct. App. 1993). “Section 13-1-67; see § 11-1-3 (joint agency may “exercise any power common to the contracting parties”).”
Gebler v. Valencia Reg'l Emergency Commc'n Ctr. (N.M. Ct. App. 2023). · cites it 2× “” Section 11-1-3. The term “public agency” specifically includes counties and municipalities.”
State Ex Rel. Eas v. Coop. Educ., 848 P.2d 1123 (N.M. Ct. App. 1993). “Section 13-1-67; see § 11-1-3 (joint agency may "exercise any power common to the contracting parties").”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.