N.M. Stat. » Chapter 21 — State and Private Education Institutions
New Mexico Statutes

N.M. Stat. § 21-9-2 (2026)

Methods of analysis

✓ laws through the 2025 session (retrieved May 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NM-LEGnmonesource.com JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

The methods of analysis employed by the state chemist of New Mexico shall be those prescribed by the association of official agricultural chemists, and those of the United States pharmacopoeia.

History: Laws 1919, ch. 169, § 2; C.S. 1929, § 131-102; 1941 Comp., § 3-1002; 1953 Comp., § 4-13-2.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1957–1971 · leading case: Marquez v. Wylie, 434 P.2d 69 (N.M. 1967).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Marquez v. Wylie, 434 P.2d 69 (N.M. 1967). · cites it 2× “Notice had long before been given to the appellants that a proposed form of judgment would be presented to the trial judge for signature and thus the requirements of § 21-9-2, N.M.S.A. 1953, were fully met. We know of no statute requiring notice of the actual entry of the…”
Barelas Cmty. Ditch Corp. v. City of Albuquerque, 312 P.2d 549 (N.M. 1957). · cites it 2× “§ 21-9-2; Fullen v. Fullen, 21 N.M. 212 , 153 P.”
Lopez v. Allied Concord Fin. Corp., 481 P.2d 700 (N.M. 1971). “The court denied the motion on the basis that it had lost jurisdiction- over the cause due to the passage of thirty days from the time of entry of judgment. Appellant contends that the trial court erred in (a) holding that it had lost jurisdiction due to the passage of thirty…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.