New Mexico Statutes

N.M. Stat. § 29-14-2 (2026)

Findings and purpose

✓ laws through the 2025 session (retrieved May 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NM-LEGnmonesource.com JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

A. The legislature finds and declares that effective law enforcement is dependent upon the maintenance of stable relations between peace officers and their employers. Moreover, the existence of stable relations between peace officers and their employers will enhance law enforcement services provided to the citizens of New Mexico.

B. The purpose of the Peace Officer's Employer-Employee Relations Act is to prescribe certain rights for peace officers, particularly when they are placed under investigation by their employer.

C. Provisions of this act only apply to administrative actions and shall not apply to criminal investigations of a peace officer except as provided in Section 8 [29-14-8 NMSA 1978] of this act.

History: Laws 1991, ch. 117, § 2.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 2006–2007 · leading case: Sedillo v. Dep't of Pub. Saf., 2007-NMCA-002, 149 P.3d 955.
Sedillo v. Dep't of Pub. Saf., 2007-NMCA-002, 149 P.3d 955. · cites it 5× “{9} Defendants argue that the POEERA does not explicitly create a private right for police officers to sue DPS in district court.”
Sedillo v. NM Dept. of Pub. Saf., 149 P.3d 955 (N.M. Ct. App. 2007). · cites it 5× “{9} Defendants argue that the POEERA does not explicitly create a private right for police officers to sue DPS in district court. Defendants argue that rather than a private right of action, POEERA prescribes certain administrative rights and remedies for peace officers,…”
N.M. Stat. § 29-14-2(C): 2 cases
Sedillo v. Dep't of Pub. Saf., 2007-NMCA-002, 149 P.3d 955. “{9} Defendants argue that the POEERA does not explicitly create a private right for police officers to sue DPS in district court.”
Sedillo v. NM Dept. of Pub. Saf., 149 P.3d 955 (N.M. Ct. App. 2007). “{9} Defendants argue that the POEERA does not explicitly create a private right for police officers to sue DPS in district court. Defendants argue that rather than a private right of action, POEERA prescribes certain administrative rights and remedies for peace officers,…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.