New Mexico Statutes
N.M. Stat. § 3-9-5 (2026)
Repealed.
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
NM-LEGnmonesource.com
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
History: 1953 Comp., § 14-8A-6, enacted by Laws 1973, ch. 375, § 6; 1978 Comp., § 3-9-6, recompiled as 1978 Comp., § 3-9-5 by Laws 1985, ch. 208, § 93; 1999, ch. 278, § 28; 2001, ch. 105, § 2; 2009, ch. 278, § 32; 2015, ch. 145, § 90; repealed by Laws 2018, ch. 79, § 175. ANNOTATIONS Repeals. — Laws 2018, ch. 79, § 175 repealed 3-9-5 NMSA 1978, as enacted by Laws 1973, ch. 375, § 6, relating to absentee ballot register, effective July 1, 2018. For provisions of former section, see the 2017 NMSA 1978 on NMOneSource.com.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3
cases, 1998–2019 · leading case: Unite New Mexico v. Oliver, 438 P.3d 343 (N.M. 2019).
Unite New Mexico v. Oliver, 438 P.3d 343 (N.M. 2019). “5, § 4; NMSA 1953, § 3-9-5 (1976). In 1978, Section 3-9-5 was recompiled as Section 1-9-4.”
Darr v. Vill. of Tularosa, 962 P.2d 640 (N.M. Ct. App. 1998). “On the other hand, the Village Clerk’s failure to comply "with requirements relating to the absentee ballot register, see § 3-9-5, and the voter signature roster, see § 3-9-4(H), may well satisfy the requirements of Section 3-8-67(A).”
Unite New Mexico v. Oliver (N.M. 2019). “5, § 4; NMSA 1953, § 3-9-5 (1976). In 1978, Section 3-9-5 was recompiled as Section 1-9-4.”
N.M. Stat. § 3-9-5(A): 1 case
Darr v. Vill. of Tularosa, 962 P.2d 640 (N.M. Ct. App. 1998). “On the other hand, the Village Clerk’s failure to comply "with requirements relating to the absentee ballot register, see § 3-9-5, and the voter signature roster, see § 3-9-4(H), may well satisfy the requirements of Section 3-8-67(A).”
N.M. Stat. § 3-9-5(H): 2 cases
Unite New Mexico v. Oliver, 438 P.3d 343 (N.M. 2019). “5, § 4; NMSA 1953, § 3-9-5 (1976). In 1978, Section 3-9-5 was recompiled as Section 1-9-4.”
Unite New Mexico v. Oliver (N.M. 2019). “5, § 4; NMSA 1953, § 3-9-5 (1976). In 1978, Section 3-9-5 was recompiled as Section 1-9-4.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.