New Mexico Statutes

N.M. Stat. § 32A-1-7 (2026)

Guardian ad litem; powers and duties.

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NM-LEGnmonesource.com JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
A. A guardian ad litem shall zealously represent the child's best interests in the
proceeding for which the guardian ad litem has been appointed and in any subsequent
appeals.

   B. Unless excused by a court, a guardian ad litem appointed to represent a child's
best interests shall continue the representation in any subsequent appeals.

    C. Any party may petition the court for an order to remove a guardian ad litem on
the grounds that the guardian ad litem has a conflict of interest or is unwilling or unable
to zealously represent the child's best interests.

   D. After consultation with the child, a guardian ad litem shall convey the child's
declared position to the court at every hearing.

   E. Unless a child's circumstances render the following duties and responsibilities
unreasonable, a guardian ad litem shall:
      (1)     meet with and interview the child prior to custody hearings, adjudicatory
hearings, dispositional hearings, judicial reviews and any other hearings scheduled in
accordance with the provisions of the Children's Code;

       (2)    communicate with health care, mental health care and other professionals
involved with the child's case;

      (3)    review medical and psychological reports relating to the child and the
respondents;

       (4)    contact the child prior to any proposed change in the child's placement;

       (5)    contact the child after changes in the child's placement;

       (6)    attend local substitute care review board hearings concerning the child
and if unable to attend the hearings, forward to the board a letter setting forth the child's
status during the period since the last local substitute care review board review and
include an assessment of the department's permanency and treatment plans;

      (7)     report to the court on the child's adjustment to placement, the
department's and respondent's compliance with prior court orders and treatment plans
and the child's degree of participation during visitations; and

       (8)    represent and protect the cultural needs of the child.

    F. A guardian ad litem may retain separate counsel to represent the child in a tort
action on a contingency fee basis or any other cause of action in proceedings that are
outside the jurisdiction of the children's court. When a guardian ad litem retains
separate counsel to represent the child, the guardian ad litem shall provide the court
with written notice within ten days of retaining the separate counsel. A guardian ad litem
shall not retain or subsequently obtain any pecuniary interest in an action filed on behalf
of the child outside of the jurisdiction of the children's court.

    G. In the event of a change of venue, the originating guardian ad litem shall remain
on the case until a new guardian ad litem is appointed by the court in the new venue
and the new guardian ad litem has communicated with and received all pertinent
information from the former guardian ad litem.

    H. A guardian ad litem shall receive notices, pleadings or other documents required
to be provided to or served upon a party. A guardian ad litem may file motions and other
pleadings and take other actions consistent with the guardian ad litem's powers and
duties.

    I. A guardian ad litem shall not serve concurrently as both the child's delinquency
attorney and guardian ad litem.
History: 1978 Comp., § 32A-1-7, enacted by Laws 1993, ch. 77, § 16; 1995, ch. 206, §
4; 2005, ch. 189, § 3.

                                    ANNOTATIONS

The 2005 amendment, effective June 17, 2005, provided in Subsection A that a
guardian ad litem shall represent a child in a proceeding for which the guardian has
been appointed and in subsequent appeals; provided in Subsection B that unless
excused by a court, a guardian ad litem shall continue the representation in subsequent
appeals; provided in Subsection D that a guardian ad litem shall convey the child's
declared position to the court at every hearing; provided in Subsection E that unless a
child's circumstances render the prescribed duties and responsibilities unreasonable,
the guardian ad litem shall perform the prescribed duties and responsibilities in
Subsection E; added Subsection H to provide that a guardian ad litem shall receive
documents required to be provided or served on a party and may file motions and
pleadings and take actions consistent with the guardian's powers and duties; and added
Subsection I to provide that a guardian ad litem shall not serve concurrently as a child's
delinquency attorney and guardian ad litem.

The 1995 amendment, effective July 1, 1995, added "with respect to matters arising
pursuant to the provisions of the Children's Code" in Subsection A; added Subsections
C and F and redesignated the remaining subsections accordingly; in Subsection E,
inserted "or any other cause of action" following "fee basis" and added the last
sentence; and made minor stylistic changes throughout the section.

Guardian ad litem's dual role. — A guardian ad litem has the dual role of representing
the child's best interests, while also presenting the child's position to the court when
reasonable and appropriate, even if the child's position conflicts with what the guardian
ad litem thinks should be done. State ex rel. Children, Youth & Families Dep't v.
Esperanza M., 1998-NMCA-039, 124 N.M. 735, 955 P.2d 204; State ex rel. Children,
Youth & Families Dep't (In re Candice Y.), 2000-NMCA-035, 128 N.M. 813, 999 P.2d
1045, cert. denied, 129 N.M. 207, 4 P.3d 35.

Attorney's dual relationship with child – as guardian ad litem during abuse and
neglect proceedings, and then as her defense attorney during delinquency proceedings
– has potential to become actual, active conflict of interest, and requires, when acting as
defense attorney, that counsel adopt child's viewpoint and zealously represent child's
wishes, whether or not counsel necessarily agrees that those wishes represent child's
best interests State v. Joanna V., 2004-NMSC-024, 136 N.M. 40, 94 P.3d 783.

Ex parte conduct rule inapplicable to guardians ad litem. — Rule 16-402 NMRA of
the rules of professional conduct does not prohibit guardians ad litem from
communicating ex parte with department of children, youth and families social workers;
although attorneys, guardians ad litem do not have typical attorney-client relationships
with children, and are therefore not bound by that rule. State ex rel. Children, Youth &
Families Dep't v. George F., 1998-NMCA-119, 125 N.M. 597, 964 P.2d 158, cert.
denied, 125 N.M. 654, 964 P.2d 818.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7 cases, 1995–2016 · leading case: State Ex Rel. Child., Youth & Families Dep't, 955 P.2d 204 (N.M. Ct. App. 1998).
State Ex Rel. Child., Youth & Families Dep't, 955 P.2d 204 (N.M. Ct. App. 1998). · cites it 8× “Thus, the appellate guardian ad litem fulfilled the dual role established in Section 32A-1-7. 39. We do not believe that a conflict between a guardian ad litem’s perception of the best interests of the child and the child’s expressed position necessarily requires that the…”
State ex rel. Child., Youth & Families Dep't, 2000 NMCA 035 (N.M. Ct. App. 2000). · cites it 6× “” NMSA 1978, § 32A-1-7 (1995). The guardian ad litem is charged with the dual duty of both representing the child’s best interests and presenting the child’s position to the court when the child’s circumstances render it reasonable and appropriate to do so.”
State ex rel. Child., Youth & Families Dep't v. George F., 1998 NMCA 119 (N.M. Ct. App. 1998). · cites it 13× “{16} Accordingly, we are persuaded that a GAL, when investigating the facts affecting the child in order to report to the court as required by Section 32A-1-7, is acting to “assist the court in carrying out its duty” and is not functioning solely as an attorney advocating the…”
State v. Joanna v., 94 P.3d 783 (N.M. 2004). · cites it 2× “Respective Roles of Guardian Ad Litem and Defense Counsel {11} The Children’s Code requires a GAL to “zealously represent the child’s best interests with respect to matters arising pursuant to the provisions of the Children’s Code.”
State Ex Rel. Child., Youth & Families Dep't v. Lilli L., 911 P.2d 884 (N.M. Ct. App. 1995). · cites it 2× “Mother correctly observes that a failure to appoint either counsel or a guardian ad litem to protect the interests of a minor may constitute a denial of due process, thereby invalidating such proceedings.”
In re Adoption Petition of Darla D. v. Grace R., 2016 NMCA 093 (N.M. Ct. App. 2016). · cites it 7× “” 1 NMSA 1978, § 32A-1-7(A) (2005). The Children’s Code further requires that “[a]fter consultation with the child, a [GAL] shall convey the child’s declared position to the court at every hearing.”
In re Adoption Petition of Darla D. v. Grace R., 2016 NMCA 93 (N.M. Ct. App. 2016). · cites it 6× “”1 NMSA 1978, § 32A-1-7(A) (2005). The Children’s Code further requires that “[a]fter consultation with the child, a [GAL] shall convey the child’s declared position to the court at every hearing.”
N.M. Stat. § 32A-1-7(A): 5 cases
State v. Joanna v., 94 P.3d 783 (N.M. 2004). “Respective Roles of Guardian Ad Litem and Defense Counsel {11} The Children’s Code requires a GAL to “zealously represent the child’s best interests with respect to matters arising pursuant to the provisions of the Children’s Code.”
State Ex Rel. Child., Youth & Families Dep't, 955 P.2d 204 (N.M. Ct. App. 1998). “Thus, the appellate guardian ad litem fulfilled the dual role established in Section 32A-1-7. 39. We do not believe that a conflict between a guardian ad litem’s perception of the best interests of the child and the child’s expressed position necessarily requires that the…”
State ex rel. Child., Youth & Families Dep't v. George F., 1998 NMCA 119 (N.M. Ct. App. 1998). “{16} Accordingly, we are persuaded that a GAL, when investigating the facts affecting the child in order to report to the court as required by Section 32A-1-7, is acting to “assist the court in carrying out its duty” and is not functioning solely as an attorney advocating the…”
In re Adoption Petition of Darla D. v. Grace R., 2016 NMCA 093 (N.M. Ct. App. 2016). “” 1 NMSA 1978, § 32A-1-7(A) (2005). The Children’s Code further requires that “[a]fter consultation with the child, a [GAL] shall convey the child’s declared position to the court at every hearing.”
In re Adoption Petition of Darla D. v. Grace R., 2016 NMCA 93 (N.M. Ct. App. 2016). “”1 NMSA 1978, § 32A-1-7(A) (2005). The Children’s Code further requires that “[a]fter consultation with the child, a [GAL] shall convey the child’s declared position to the court at every hearing.”
N.M. Stat. § 32A-1-7(C): 1 case
State ex rel. Child., Youth & Families Dep't, 2000 NMCA 035 (N.M. Ct. App. 2000). “” NMSA 1978, § 32A-1-7 (1995). The guardian ad litem is charged with the dual duty of both representing the child’s best interests and presenting the child’s position to the court when the child’s circumstances render it reasonable and appropriate to do so.”
N.M. Stat. § 32A-1-7(D): 4 cases
State ex rel. Child., Youth & Families Dep't, 2000 NMCA 035 (N.M. Ct. App. 2000). “” NMSA 1978, § 32A-1-7 (1995). The guardian ad litem is charged with the dual duty of both representing the child’s best interests and presenting the child’s position to the court when the child’s circumstances render it reasonable and appropriate to do so.”
State ex rel. Child., Youth & Families Dep't v. George F., 1998 NMCA 119 (N.M. Ct. App. 1998). “{16} Accordingly, we are persuaded that a GAL, when investigating the facts affecting the child in order to report to the court as required by Section 32A-1-7, is acting to “assist the court in carrying out its duty” and is not functioning solely as an attorney advocating the…”
In re Adoption Petition of Darla D. v. Grace R., 2016 NMCA 093 (N.M. Ct. App. 2016). “” 1 NMSA 1978, § 32A-1-7(A) (2005). The Children’s Code further requires that “[a]fter consultation with the child, a [GAL] shall convey the child’s declared position to the court at every hearing.”
In re Adoption Petition of Darla D. v. Grace R., 2016 NMCA 93 (N.M. Ct. App. 2016). “”1 NMSA 1978, § 32A-1-7(A) (2005). The Children’s Code further requires that “[a]fter consultation with the child, a [GAL] shall convey the child’s declared position to the court at every hearing.”
N.M. Stat. § 32A-1-7(D)(2): 1 case
State Ex Rel. Child., Youth & Families Dep't, 955 P.2d 204 (N.M. Ct. App. 1998). “Thus, the appellate guardian ad litem fulfilled the dual role established in Section 32A-1-7. 39. We do not believe that a conflict between a guardian ad litem’s perception of the best interests of the child and the child’s expressed position necessarily requires that the…”
N.M. Stat. § 32A-1-7(D)(3): 1 case
State ex rel. Child., Youth & Families Dep't v. George F., 1998 NMCA 119 (N.M. Ct. App. 1998). “{16} Accordingly, we are persuaded that a GAL, when investigating the facts affecting the child in order to report to the court as required by Section 32A-1-7, is acting to “assist the court in carrying out its duty” and is not functioning solely as an attorney advocating the…”
N.M. Stat. § 32A-1-7(D)(8): 1 case
State ex rel. Child., Youth & Families Dep't v. George F., 1998 NMCA 119 (N.M. Ct. App. 1998). “{16} Accordingly, we are persuaded that a GAL, when investigating the facts affecting the child in order to report to the court as required by Section 32A-1-7, is acting to “assist the court in carrying out its duty” and is not functioning solely as an attorney advocating the…”
N.M. Stat. § 32A-1-7(E): 3 cases
State ex rel. Child., Youth & Families Dep't v. George F., 1998 NMCA 119 (N.M. Ct. App. 1998). “{16} Accordingly, we are persuaded that a GAL, when investigating the facts affecting the child in order to report to the court as required by Section 32A-1-7, is acting to “assist the court in carrying out its duty” and is not functioning solely as an attorney advocating the…”
In re Adoption Petition of Darla D. v. Grace R., 2016 NMCA 093 (N.M. Ct. App. 2016). “” 1 NMSA 1978, § 32A-1-7(A) (2005). The Children’s Code further requires that “[a]fter consultation with the child, a [GAL] shall convey the child’s declared position to the court at every hearing.”
In re Adoption Petition of Darla D. v. Grace R., 2016 NMCA 93 (N.M. Ct. App. 2016). “”1 NMSA 1978, § 32A-1-7(A) (2005). The Children’s Code further requires that “[a]fter consultation with the child, a [GAL] shall convey the child’s declared position to the court at every hearing.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.