New Mexico Statutes
N.M. Stat. § 35-12-18 (2026)
Garnishment; form of writ.
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
NM-LEGnmonesource.com
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Writs of garnishment in civil actions in the magistrate court shall state whether the
writ is issued in advance of or in aid of execution of judgment and shall be in
substantially the following form:
"STATE OF NEW MEXICO
__________________MAGISTRATE DISTRICT, DIVISION ________
(Name), Plaintiff )
)
v. ) CIVIL DOCKET NO. ___________
)
(Name), Defendant )
)
(Name), Garnishee )
WRIT OF GARNISHMENT
THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO to the above-named garnishee:
You are ordered to appear before the magistrate court located at
_______________________ within twenty days from the service of this writ upon you to
answer under oath the following questions, as of the date of service and as of the date
of your answer:
1. What, if anything, are you indebted to the defendant in this action and on what
account?
2. What, if any, personal property of the defendant is in your possession or under
your control?
3. What other persons, if any, within your knowledge are indebted to the defendant
or have personal property of the defendant in their possession?
Service of this writ upon you has the effect of attaching all nonexempt personal
property, money, rights, credits, bonds, bills, notes, drafts and other choses in action of
the defendant in your possession or under your control at the time of service and that
may come into your possession or under your control or be owing by you between the
time of service and the time of making your answer.
This writ was issued in (advance) (aid of execution) of judgment against the
defendant. If this writ was issued in advance of judgment, it does not attach any wages
or salary due from you to the defendant. If this writ was issued in aid of execution of
judgment, it attaches wages or salary due from you to the defendant in excess of the
greater of the following portions of the defendant's disposable earnings:
A. seventy-five percent of the defendant's disposable earnings for any pay period;
or
B. an amount each week equal to forty times the highest applicable minimum hourly
wage rate at the place the wages were earned. A table giving equivalent exemptions
for pay periods of other than one week may be obtained from the director of the
financial institutions division of the regulation and licensing department. "Disposable
earnings" means that part of the defendant's wage or salary remaining after deducting
the amounts that are required by law to be withheld. "Highest applicable minimum
hourly wage rate" means the highest federal, state or local minimum hourly wage rate
for an eight-hour day or a forty-hour week. It is immaterial whether you are exempt
under federal, state or local law from paying the highest applicable minimum hourly
wage rate.
FINANCIAL INSTITUTION WRITS
If you are a financial institution, the defendant who is an individual or sole proprietor
has an exemption totaling two thousand four hundred dollars ($2,400) in depository and
investment accounts. This writ attaches only to money in excess of two thousand four
hundred dollars ($2,400). You may rely on the representations of the person executing
this writ as to whether the exemption amount has already been satisfied with other
accounts held by other financial institutions. This provision shall not prevent the
individual or sole proprietor from claiming that additional money in depository or
investment accounts is exempt under any other available exemption provided by law.
Any wages you owe the employee in excess of two thousand four hundred dollars
($2,400) or that you may come to owe the employee in excess of that amount must be
kept by you until further order of this court. This means that you shall not pay the non-
exempt amounts to the plaintiff until further order from this court requiring payment.
It is unlawful to pay or deliver to the defendant any item attached by this writ. If you
fail to appear and answer as directed, or if you unlawfully dispose of any item attached
by this writ, judgment may be rendered against you for the full amount of the plaintiff's
claim against the defendant in this action.
Dated _______________, 20 ___________________________
Magistrate".
History: 1953 Comp., § 36-14-15, enacted by Laws 1968, ch. 62, § 147; 1969, ch. 139,
§ 9; 1978 Comp., § 35-12-18; 2023, ch. 104, § 3.
ANNOTATIONS
The 2023 amendment, effective July 1, 2023, revised the statutory form for a writ of
garnishment; in Item 3, after "attaching all", added "nonexempt"; in Subsection B, after
"forty times the", deleted "federal" and added "highest applicable", after "hourly wage
rate", added "at the place the wages were earned", after "obtained from the", deleted
"commissioner of banking" and added "director of the financial institutions division of the
regulation and licensing department", after "withheld", deleted "Federal" and added
"Highest applicable", after "under federal", added "state or local", and after "paying the",
deleted "federal" and added "highest applicable"; and added the heading "FINANCIAL
INSTITUTION WRITS" and added the first two undesignated paragraphs.
Applicability. — Laws 2023, ch. 104, § 13 provided that the provisions of Laws 2023,
ch. 104 apply to actions filed on or after July 1, 2023.
Am. Jur. 2d, A.L.R. and C.J.S. references. — United States Postal Service as subject
to garnishment, 38 A.L.R. Fed. 546.Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2
cases, 2011–2018 · leading case: In re Johnson, 593 B.R. 331 (Bankr. D.N.M. 2018).
In re Johnson, 593 B.R. 331 (Bankr. D.N.M. 2018). “1978 § 35-12-18, further reinforces the conclusion that the garnishment exemption applies only to wages due from the employer to the judgment debtor.”
Alcantar v. Sanchez, 257 P.3d 966 (N.M. Ct. App. 2011). “See NMSA 1978, § 35-12-18 (1969) (generally setting forth the form of writs of garnishment issued by the magistrate courts); NMSA 1978, § 35-12-19 (1979) (providing for the issuance of writs of garnishment by the district courts in the same manner specified for the magistrate…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.