New Mexico Statutes

N.M. Stat. § 38-6-6 (2026)

Privileged communications.

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NM-LEGnmonesource.com JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
A. No husband shall be compelled to disclose any communication made by his wife
during the marriage, and no wife shall be compelled to disclose any communication
made to her by her husband during the marriage.

   B. An attorney cannot, without the consent of his client, be examined as to any
communication made by the client to him, or his advice given thereon in the course of
professional employment; nor can an attorney's secretary, stenographer or clerk be
examined, without the consent of his employer, concerning any fact the knowledge of
which has been acquired in such capacity.

    C. In the courts of the state, no certified public accountant or public accountant shall
be permitted to disclose information obtained in the conduct of any examination, audit or
other investigation made in a professional capacity, or which may have been disclosed
to said accountant by a client, without the consent in writing of such client or his, her or
its successors or legal representatives.

   D. If a person offers himself as a witness and voluntarily testifies with reference to
the communications specified in this section, that is a consent to the examination of the
person to whom the communications were made as above provided.

History: Laws 1880, ch. 12, § 7; C.L. 1884, § 2081; C.L. 1897, § 3020; Code 1915, §
2174; C.S. 1929, § 45-512; Laws 1933, ch. 33, § 1; 1939, ch. 235, § 1; 1941 Comp., §
20-112; 1953 Comp., § 20-1-12; Laws 1973, ch. 223, § 1.

                                     ANNOTATIONS

Compiler's notes. — It has been stated in Ammerman v. Hubbard Broadcasting, Inc.,
89 N.M. 307, 312, 551 P.2d 1354, 1359 (1976), that "no person has a privilege, except
as provided by constitution or rule of . . . court . . .."

Cross references. — For privileges generally, see Rule 11-501 NMRA.

Spousal privilege. — This statute extends a spousal testimonial privilege to any
communication. Rule 11-505 NMRA, however, provides that one spouse may prevent
another from disclosing a confidential communication made during the marriage. Thus,
the statute is far more comprehensive and seeks to grant a greater privilege than does
the rule. The New Mexico supreme court has held that any conflict between the rules of
evidence and statutes attempting to create evidentiary privileges must be resolved in
favor of the rules. Section 38-6-6A NMSA 1978, which mirrors the older common law
rule that neither spouse could be compelled to disclose a communication made during
the marriage, does not govern the court's decision. State v. Teel, 1985-NMCA-115, 103
N.M. 684, 712 P.2d 792.

In suit for alienation of affections, letters written to plaintiff by her husband,
showing a deep affection for her, were competent to rebut claim of defendant that no
affection existed and there was none to be lost. Murray v. Murray, 1925-NMSC-029, 30
N.M. 557, 240 P. 303.

Attorney-client privilege should only be applied to protect communications - not
facts. State ex rel. State Hwy. Comm'n v. Steinkraus, 1966-NMSC-134, 76 N.M. 617,
417 P.2d 431.

Allowance of accountant's testimony held not error. — The privilege in this section
is available only to the client and where this privilege was not asserted by objection or
otherwise, allowance of the testimony of defendant's accountant was not error. Ash v.
H.G. Reiter Co., Inc., 1967-NMSC-149, 78 N.M. 194, 429 P.2d 653.

Law reviews. — For article, "New Mexico's Accountant-Client Privilege," see 37 N.M.L.
Rev. 387 (2007).

For note, "Protecting Privileged Information-A New Procedure for Resolving Claims of
the Physician-Patient Privilege in New Mexico-Pina v. Expinoza," see 32 N.M.L. Rev.
453 (2002).

Am. Jur. 2d, A.L.R. and C.J.S. references. — 81 Am. Jur. 2d Witnesses §§ 285, 286,
290.

Privilege of communication to attorney as affected by termination of employment, 5
A.L.R. 728.

Privilege of communication to attorney by client in attempt to establish false claim, 5
A.L.R. 977, 9 A.L.R. 1081.

Admissibility of statements by attorney out of court as to probability of verdict or
decision adverse to client, 8 A.L.R. 1334.

Waiver by beneficiary or personal representative, in actions on insurance policy of
privilege of communications to physician, 15 A.L.R. 1544.
Competency of hospital physician or attendant to testify as to condition of patient, 22
A.L.R. 1217.

Privilege as to family matters or affairs incidentally learned by physicians while
professionally attending patient, 24 A.L.R. 1202.

Applicability and effect in suit for alienation of affections of rule excluding confidential
communications between husband and wife, 36 A.L.R. 1068, 82 A.L.R. 825.

Privilege as to facts learned on autopsy or post-mortem examination, 58 A.L.R. 1134.

Instruction which either affirms or denies jury's right to draw unfavorable inference
against party invoking privilege against testimony of physician, 131 A.L.R. 696.

Public health record as subject of privilege, 136 A.L.R. 856.

Public officers or employees, constitutionality, construction and effect of statute or
regulation relating specifically to divulgence of information acquired by, 165 A.L.R.
1302.

Conversations between husband and wife relating to property or business as within rule
excluding private communications between them, 4 A.L.R.2d 835.

Observed matters: "communications" within testimonial privilege of confidential
communications between husband and wife as including knowledge derived from
observation by one spouse of acts of other spouse, 10 A.L.R.2d 1389.

Construction and effect of statute removing or modifying, in personal injury actions,
patient's privilege against disclosure by physician, 25 A.L.R.2d 1429.

Admissibility of evidence of unperformed compromise agreement, 26 A.L.R.2d 858.

Deadman's Statute as applicable to spouse of party disqualified from testifying, 27
A.L.R.2d 538.

Divorce: effect of divorce or annulment on competency of one former spouse as witness
against other in criminal prosecution, 38 A.L.R.2d 570.

Wills: proof of due execution of lost will as affected by privilege attaching to attorney-
client communications, 41 A.L.R.2d 401.

Nurse or attendant, privilege of communications by or to, 47 A.L.R.2d 742.

Waiver by party of privilege as to communications with counsel by taking stand and
testifying, 51 A.L.R.2d 521.
Hypothetical question, right of physician, notwithstanding physician-patient privilege, to
give expert testimony based on, 64 A.L.R.2d 1056.

Privilege as to communications to attorney in connection with drawing of will, 66
A.L.R.2d 1302, 75 A.L.R.4th 1144.

Executors: waiver of attorney-client privilege by personal representative or heir of
deceased client or by guardian of incompetent, 67 A.L.R.2d 1268.

Calling or offering accused's spouse as witness for prosecution as prejudicial
misconduct, 76 A.L.R.2d 920.

Spouse as competent witness for or against co-offender with other spouse, 90 A.L.R.2d
648.

Federal courts as following law of forum state with respect to privileged
communications, 95 A.L.R.2d 320.

Persons other than client or attorney affected by, or included within, attorney-client
privilege, 96 A.L.R.2d 125, 31 A.L.R.4th 1226.

Who may waive privilege of confidential communications to physician by person since
deceased, 97 A.L.R.2d 393.

Corporation's right to assert attorney-client privilege, 98 A.L.R.2d 241, 26 A.L.R.5th 628,
27 A.L.R.5th 76.

Mental condition: testimony as to communications or observations as to mental
condition of patient treated for other condition, 100 A.L.R.2d 648.

Tort: applicability of attorney-client privilege to communications with respect to
contemplated tortious acts, 2 A.L.R.3d 861.

Waiver of privilege as regards one physician as a waiver as to other physicians, 5
A.L.R.3d 1244.

Applicability in criminal proceedings of privilege as to communications between
physician and patient, 7 A.L.R.3d 1458.

Attorney-client privilege as affected by communications between several attorneys, 9
A.L.R.3d 1420.

Crime: attorney-client privilege as affected by its assertion as to communications, or
transmission of evidence, relating to crime already committed, 16 A.L.R.3d 1029.
Disclosure of name, identity, address, occupation, or business of client as violation of
attorney-client privilege, 16 A.L.R.3d 1047.

Commencing action involving physical condition of plaintiff or decedent as waiving
physician-patient privilege as to discovery proceedings, 21 A.L.R.3d 912.

Pretrial testimony or disclosure on discovery by party to personal injury action as to
nature of injuries or treatment as waiver of physician-patient privilege, 25 A.L.R.3d
1401.

Bankruptcy trustee: power of trustee in bankruptcy to waive privilege of communications
available to bankrupt, 31 A.L.R.3d 557.

Admissibility of statements to physician by person since deceased, 37 A.L.R.3d 778.

Who is "clergyman" or the like entitled to assert privilege attaching to communications to
clergymen or spiritual advisers, 49 A.L.R.3d 1205.

Matters to which the privilege covering communications to clergyman or spiritual adviser
extends, 71 A.L.R.3d 794.

Competency of one spouse to testify against other in prosecution for offense against
child of both or either, 93 A.L.R.3d 1018.

Effect, on competency to testify against spouse or on marital communication privilege,
of separation or other marital instability short of absolute divorce, 98 A.L.R.3d 1285.

Admissibility of evidence discovered in search of defendant's property or residence
authorized by defendant's spouse (resident or nonresident) - state case, 1 A.L.R.4th
673.

Spouse's betrayal or connivance as extending marital communications privilege to
testimony of third person, 3 A.L.R.4th 1104.

Communication between unmarried couple living together as privileged, 4 A.L.R.4th
422.

Testimony before or communications to private professional society's judicial
commission, ethics committee or the like, as privileged, 9 A.L.R.4th 807.

Existence of spousal privilege where marriage was entered into for purpose of barring
testimony, 13 A.L.R.4th 1305.

Applicability of attorney-client privilege to communications made in presence of or solely
to or by third person, 14 A.L.R.4th 594.
Attorney-client privilege as extending to communications relating to contemplated civil
fraud, 31 A.L.R.4th 458.

Privilege as to communications between lay representative in judicial or administrative
proceedings and client, 31 A.L.R.4th 1226.

Privileged communications between accountant and client, 33 A.L.R.4th 539.

Attorney as witness for client in civil proceedings - modern state cases, 35 A.L.R.4th
810.

Physician's tort liability for unauthorized disclosure of confidential information about
patient, 48 A.L.R.4th 668.

Discovery: right to ex parte interview with injured party's treating physician, 50 A.L.R.4th
714.

Communications between spouses as to joint participation in crime as within privilege of
interspousal communications, 62 A.L.R.4th 1134.

Compelling testimony of opponent's expert in state court, 66 A.L.R.4th 213.

Who is "representative of the client" within state statute or rule privileging
communications between an attorney and the representative of the client, 66 A.L.R.4th
1227.

Invasion of privacy by a clergyman, church, or religious group, 67 A.L.R.4th 1086.

Crimes against spouse within exception permitting testimony by one spouse against
other in criminal prosecution - modern state cases, 74 A.L.R.4th 223.

Competency of one spouse to testify against other in prosecution for offense against
third party as affected by fact that offense against spouse was involved in same
transaction, 74 A.L.R.4th 277.

Involuntary disclosure or surrender of will prior to testator's death, 75 A.L.R.4th 1144.

Adverse presumption or inference based on party's failure to produce or examine
spouse - modern cases, 79 A.L.R.4th 694.

Determination of whether a communication is from a corporate client for purposes of the
attorney-client privilege - modern cases, 26 A.L.R.5th 628.

What corporate communications are entitled to attorney-client privilege - modern cases,
27 A.L.R.5th 76.
Waiver of evidentiary privilege by inadvertent disclosure-state law, 51 A.L.R.5th 603.

Testimonial privilege for confidential communications between relatives other than
husband and wife - state cases, 62 A.L.R.5th 629.

Marital privilege under Rule 501 of Federal Rules of Evidence, 46 A.L.R. Fed. 735.

Immunity's sufficiency to meet federal grand jury witness' claim of privilege against
adverse spousal testimony, 82 A.L.R. Fed. 600.

Waiver of evidentiary privilege by inadvertent disclosure - federal law, 159 A.L.R. Fed.
153.

Views of United States Supreme Court as to attorney-client privilege, 159 A.L.R. Fed.
243.

97 C.J.S. Witnesses §§ 252 to 314.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases, 1981–2019 · leading case: Trujillo v. Puro, 683 P.2d 963 (N.M. Ct. App. 1984).
Trujillo v. Puro, 683 P.2d 963 (N.M. Ct. App. 1984). · cites it 2× “NMSA 1978, § 38-6-6. In State ex rel. Attorney General v.”
Brown v. State, 753 A.2d 84 (Md. 2000). · cites it 2× “§ 2A:84A-22 (West 1994); N.M. Stat. Ann. § 38-6-6 (Michie 1999); N.”
State v. Gutierrez, 2021 NMSC 008 (N.M. 2019). · cites it 4× “For this reason, the existence of NMSA 1978, Section 38-6-6 (1973) has little bearing upon whether New Mexico courts should continue to recognize the spousal communication privilege.”
State v. Freeman, 276 S.E.2d 450 (N.C. 1981). “§§ 19-13-1, 19-13-12 thru 19-13-15 (1979). New Mexico and South Carolina have abolished the spousal disqualification in criminal proceedings and provided by statute that the witness spouse alone may assert a privilege not to testify as to confidential communications between the…”
State v. Teel, 712 P.2d 792 (N.M. Ct. App. 1985). · cites it 4× “NMSA 1978, Section 38-6-6 refers to privileged communications between spouses.”
Colorado State Bd. of Acct. v. Zaveral Boosalis Raisch, 960 P.2d 102 (Colo. 1998). “185 (Michie 1996); N.M. Stat. Ann. § 38-6-6 (Michie 1978 & Supp.”
— N.M. Stat. § 38-6-6(A) — 2 cases
State v. Gutierrez, 2021 NMSC 008 (N.M. 2019). “For this reason, the existence of NMSA 1978, Section 38-6-6 (1973) has little bearing upon whether New Mexico courts should continue to recognize the spousal communication privilege.”
State v. Teel, 712 P.2d 792 (N.M. Ct. App. 1985). “NMSA 1978, Section 38-6-6 refers to privileged communications between spouses.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.