New Mexico Statutes

N.M. Stat. § 41-4-20 (2026)

Coverage of risks; insurance

✓ laws through the 2025 session (retrieved May 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NM-LEGnmonesource.com JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

A. It shall be the duty of governmental entities to cover every risk for which immunity has been waived under the provisions of the Tort Claims Act or any liability imposed under Section 41-4-4 NMSA 1978 as follows:

(1) local public bodies shall cover every such risk or liability as follows:

(a) for a risk for which immunity has been waived pursuant to Sections 41-4- 9, 41-4-10 and 41-4-12 NMSA 1978, the local public body shall cover the risk, and for any commercially uninsurable risk for which public liability fund coverage is made available, the local public body may insure the risk in accordance with the provisions of Section 41-4-25 NMSA 1978;

(b) for excess liability for damages arising under and subject to the substantive law of a jurisdiction other than New Mexico, including but not limited to other states, territories and possessions and the United States of America, the local public body shall provide coverage in accordance with the provisions of Subsection B of Section 41-4-27 [41-4-28] NMSA 1978, if coverage is available; and

(c) for a risk or liability not covered pursuant to Subparagraphs (a) and (b) of this paragraph, the local public body shall purchase insurance, establish reserves or provide a combination of insurance and reserves or provide insurance in any other manner authorized by law; and

(2) for state agencies, the risk management division shall insure or otherwise cover every such risk or liability in accordance with the provisions of Section 41-4-23 NMSA 1978. Coverage shall include but is not limited to coverage for all such liability arising under and subject to the substantive law of a jurisdiction other than New Mexico, including but not limited to other states, territories and possessions and the United States of America.

B. The department of finance and administration shall not approve the budget of any governmental entity that has not budgeted an adequate amount of money to insure or otherwise cover pursuant to this section or Section 3-62-2 NMSA 1978 every risk of the governmental entity for which immunity has been waived under the provisions of the Tort Claims Act or liability imposed under Section 41-4-4 NMSA 1978. The public school finance division of the department of finance and administration shall not approve the budget of any school district which has failed to budget sufficient revenues to insure or otherwise cover pursuant to this section every risk for which immunity has been waived pursuant to the provisions of the Tort Claims Act or liability imposed under Section 41-4- 4 NMSA 1978.

C. No liability insurance may be purchased by any governmental entity other than as authorized by the Tort Claims Act.

History: Laws 1976, ch. 58, § 18; 1953 Comp., § 5-14-18; Laws 1977, ch. 247, § 52; 1977, ch. 386, § 15; 1978, ch. 166, § 3; 1979, ch. 287, § 4; 1979, ch. 392, § 2; 1981, ch. 268, § 1.

ANNOTATIONS

Bracketed material. — The bracketed material was inserted by the compiler to correct an apparently incorrect reference and is not part of the law.

Existence of insurance as waiver of immunity. — Without specific authorization by the legislature, the existence of insurance covering a governmental agency does not constitute a waiver of immunity from suit. Chavez v. Mountainair Sch. Bd., 1969-NMCA- 060, 80 N.M. 450, 457 P.2d 382.

Where insufficiency of insurance not raised. — No question of immunity from suit existed where no claim was made that the insurance was insufficient to cover the amount of the verdict. Williams v. Town of Silver City, 1972-NMCA-132, 84 N.M. 279, 502 P.2d 304, cert. denied, 84 N.M. 271, 502 P.2d 296.

Two-year statute of limitations applicable to negligence suit involving public utility's employee. — Section 41-4-15 NMSA 1978 of the Tort Claims Act, allowing two years to bring suit, and not the one-year limitation of 37-1-24 NMSA 1978, which refers to the time for bringing suits in negligence against any city, town or village, or any officers thereof, applies to a suit for negligence of a public employee in the operation of a public utility. Cozart v. Town of Bernalillo, 1983-NMCA-053, 99 N.M. 737, 663 P.2d 713.

A state agency cannot contractually expand the legislature's restriction on tort liability. — Indemnification is a contractual obligation, and the legislature has waived sovereign immunity for valid written contracts. For tort liability, however, the legislature has waived sovereign immunity only within the limitation of the Tort Claims Act, and therefore a state agency cannot contractually expand the legislature's restriction on tort liability. 2025 Op. Att'y Gen. No. 25-05.

Naming the United States as an additional insured on a commercial general liability insurance policy does not violate the Tort Claims Act. — Where the United States department of agriculture and the New Mexico general services department proposed an agreement where the state of New Mexico, in exchange for the state's use of federal land under special use permits issued by the United States forest service, agreed to indemnify the United States for tort liability associated with the state's use of the federal lands up to the liability limits in the Tort Claims Act (TCA) by acquiring commercial general liability insurance, with the United States named as an additional insured, for communications use leases and provide for self-insurance, with the United States named as an additional insured, for all special use authorizations issued for non- communications uses of federal lands, there is no prohibition for naming the United States as an additional insured on a commercial general liability insurance policy, because the provision that the state's indemnity obligation is subject to the limits of liability under the TCA is consistent with the legislature's limited waiver of sovereign immunity under 41-4-2 NMSA 1978, and naming an additional insured on a commercial general liability insurance policy purchased to satisfy the indemnity requirements does not expose the state to any greater risk under the TCA and only obligates the state to pay for insurance costs. 2025 Op. Att'y Gen. No. 25-05.

State agency's self-insurance policy naming the United States as an additional insured expands the state's liability risk beyond the legislature's waiver of sovereign immunity and thus violates the Tort Claims Act. — Where the United States department of agriculture and the New Mexico general services department proposed an agreement where the state of New Mexico, in exchange for the state's use of federal land under special use permits issued by the United States forest service, agreed to indemnify the United States for tort liability associated with the state's use of the federal lands up to the liability limits in the Tort Claims Act (TCA) by acquiring commercial general liability insurance, with the United States named as an additional insured, for communications use leases and provide for self-insurance, with the United States named as an additional insured, for all special use authorizations issued for non- communications uses of federal lands, the self-insurance proposal goes beyond the statutorily authorized indemnity for the state and local public bodies to create indemnity for the United States as an additional named insured, and this indemnity is not restricted to the limited wavier of liability in the TCA and would exceed the maximum liability in the TCA. 2025 Op. Att'y Gen. No. 25-05.

Law reviews. — For survey, "Torts: Sovereign and Governmental Immunity in New Mexico," see 6 N.M.L. Rev. 249 (1976).

Am. Jur. 2d, A.L.R. and C.J.S. references. — Liability or indemnity insurance carried by governmental unit as affecting immunity from tort liability, 68 A.L.R.2d 1437.

When does statute of limitations begin to run upon an action by subrogated insurer against third-party tortfeasor, 91 A.L.R.3d 844.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 14 cases (3 in the last 5 years), 1970–2026 · leading case: Daddow v. Carlsbad Mun. Sch. Dist., 898 P.2d 1235 (N.M. 1995).
Daddow v. Carlsbad Mun. Sch. Dist., 898 P.2d 1235 (N.M. 1995). · cites it 16× “Section 41-4-20 of the Tort Claims Act requires that all "local public bod[ies] .”
Risk Mgmt. Div. v. McBrayer, 14 P.3d 43 (N.M. Ct. App. 2000). · cites it 5× “See § 41-4-20 (coverage of risks; insurance).”
Bd. of Commissioners v. Las Cruces Sun-News, 2003-NMCA-102, 76 P.3d 36. · cites it 2× “” Section 41-4-20(A). Counties which are insured by RMD contribute money to the public liability fund, which RMD is then authorized to expend to respond to tort liability claims.”
Wells v. Cnty. of Valencia, 644 P.2d 517 (N.M. 1982). · cites it 2× “Section 41-4-20(A)(l)(b), N.M.S.A.1978 (Cum.”
Rubio Ex Rel. Rubio v. Carlsbad Mun. Sch. Dist., 744 P.2d 919 (N.M. Ct. App. 1987). · cites it 2× “rnmental entities and their employees to assert any available defenses, Section 41-4-14; the requirement that claims be commenced within a prescribed period of time so as to avoid a bar, Section 41-4-15; the requirement of giving timely written notice, Section 41-4-16; the…”
Duke v. Grady Mun. Schs., 127 F.3d 972 (10th Cir. 1997). “§ 41-4-20 (A)(l)(c), requires local public bodies to "purchase insurance, establish reserves or provide a combination of insurance and reserves or provide insurance in any other manner authorized by law” to satisfy liabilities arising under the Tort Claims Act. Section…”
Singhas v. New Mexico State High. Dep't, 902 P.2d 1077 (N.M. Ct. App. 1995). · cites it 2× “Tort claims against either the Highway Department or the Public Defender must be funneled through RMD because the State is responsible for the liability arising from actions of its agencies.”
Cozart v. Town of Bernalillo, 663 P.2d 713 (N.M. Ct. App. 1983). · cites it 2× “” Section 41-4-20 requires “local public bodies” to provide certain insurance coverages; § 41-4-25 refers to elective participation of municipalities in the public liability fund or, alternatively, to establishment of municipal public liability funds; §§ 41 — 4—26 and -27…”
State v. United Bonding Ins. Co., 464 P.2d 884 (N.M. 1970). · cites it 2× “Section 41-4-20, N.M.S.A.1953 Comp. Had United effected a taking of James and delivered him at any time during the lengthy period when the writs of this court were outstanding and before the forfeiture procedure commenced, its obligation as bail would have been fulfilled.”
Otero v. State, 737 P.2d 90 (N.M. Ct. App. 1987). “Sections 41-4-20, -22 and -25 to -29 contain detailed provisions relating to how the risks will be covered, i.”
T.H. v. Martinez, No. 2:24-cv-00887 (D.N.M. Feb. 27, 2025). · cites it 5× “N.M. Stat. Ann. §§ 41-4-20 , -4(C). While negotiating his criminal plea—at which time he was presumably attempting to lessen the charges against him and attempting to curry favor with the victim who has a right to speak at his sentencing—he agreed to completely decline to…”
Wrongful Death Est. of Rosemary Naegele v. Khawaja, No. 2:19-cv-01165 (D.N.M. Dec. 4, 2020). · cites it 2× “§ 41-4-10 outside the scope of the two-year TCA statute of limitations, assuming that public health care providers regularly carry malpractice insurance or purchase it for their employees (coverage expressly contemplated by the TCA in N.M. Stat. Ann. §§ 41-4-20 (C), 41-4-22,…”
N.M. Stat. § 41-4-20(A): 2 cases
Bd. of Commissioners v. Las Cruces Sun-News, 2003-NMCA-102, 76 P.3d 36. “” Section 41-4-20(A). Counties which are insured by RMD contribute money to the public liability fund, which RMD is then authorized to expend to respond to tort liability claims.”
Risk Mgmt. Div. v. McBrayer, 14 P.3d 43 (N.M. Ct. App. 2000). “See § 41-4-20 (coverage of risks; insurance).”
N.M. Stat. § 41-4-20(A)(1)(c): 1 case
Daddow v. Carlsbad Mun. Sch. Dist., 898 P.2d 1235 (N.M. 1995). “Section 41-4-20 of the Tort Claims Act requires that all "local public bod[ies] .”
N.M. Stat. § 41-4-20(A)(2): 2 cases
Risk Mgmt. Div. v. McBrayer, 14 P.3d 43 (N.M. Ct. App. 2000). “See § 41-4-20 (coverage of risks; insurance).”
Singhas v. New Mexico State High. Dep't, 902 P.2d 1077 (N.M. Ct. App. 1995). “Tort claims against either the Highway Department or the Public Defender must be funneled through RMD because the State is responsible for the liability arising from actions of its agencies.”
N.M. Stat. § 41-4-20(A)(l)(b): 1 case
Wells v. Cnty. of Valencia, 644 P.2d 517 (N.M. 1982). “Section 41-4-20(A)(l)(b), N.M.S.A.1978 (Cum.”
N.M. Stat. § 41-4-20(A)(l)(e): 1 case
Daddow v. Carlsbad Mun. Sch. Dist., 898 P.2d 1235 (N.M. 1995). “Section 41-4-20 of the Tort Claims Act requires that all "local public bod[ies] .”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.