New Mexico Statutes

N.M. Stat. § 44-2-8 (2026)

[Allowance of writ; return day; service.]

✓ laws through the 2025 session (retrieved May 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NM-LEGnmonesource.com JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

The court or judge, by an indorsement on the writ, shall allow the same, designate the return day thereof and direct the manner of service. History: Laws 1884, ch. 1, § 42; C.L. 1884, § 1997; C.L. 1897, § 2765; Code 1915, § 3417; C.S. 1929, § 86-107; 1941 Comp., § 26-108; 1953 Comp., § 22-12-8.

ANNOTATIONS

Law reviews. — For article, "Mandamus in New Mexico," see 4 N.M. L. Rev. 155 (1974).

Am. Jur. 2d, A.L.R. and C.J.S. references. — 52 Am. Jur. 2d Mandamus §§ 411, 428, 480.

55 C.J.S. Mandamus §§ 319, 321, 350, 351.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2015–2022 · leading case: Hoyt v. State, 2015-NMCA-108, 359 P.3d 147.
Hoyt v. State, 2015-NMCA-108, 359 P.3d 147. · cites it 2× “This pleading laid out OMI’s belief that 18 the writ was alternative for allegedly failing to include language required by the 5 1 statutes governing peremptory writs and, therefore, permitted a response under 2 NMSA 1978, § 44-2-8 (1884). In this “answer,” OMI asserted…”
Franklin v. Corizon Health, No. A-1-CA-40037 (N.M. Ct. App. Oct. 6, 2022). · cites it 2× “See NMSA 1978, § 44-2-8 (1884) (explaining that the court shall, “by an indorsement on the writ,” provide a return date and direct the manner of service); Trujillo, 2005-NMCA-095, ¶ 9 .”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.