In the arbitration of a dispute between a consumer, borrower, tenant or employee
and another party, a disabling civil dispute clause contained in a document relevant to
the dispute is unenforceable against and voidable by the consumer, borrower, tenant or
employee. If the enforcement of such a clause is at issue as a preliminary matter in
connection with arbitration, the consumer, borrower, tenant or employee may seek
judicial relief to have the clause declared unenforceable in a court having personal
jurisdiction of the parties and subject matter jurisdiction of the issue.
History: Laws 2001, ch. 227, § 5.
ANNOTATIONS
Compiler's note. — Laws 2002, ch. 227, § 33 repealed the former Uniform Arbitration
Act, Sections 44-7-1 to 44-7-22 NMSA 1978, enacted by Laws 1971, ch. 168, §23. The
Uniform Arbitration Act compiled as 44-7A-1 to 44-7A-32 NMSA 1978 was enacted
effective July 1, 2001.
Am. Jur. 2d, A.L.R. and C.J.S. references. — Constitutionality of compulsory
arbitration statutes, 55 A.L.R.2d 432.
Validity and enforceability of provision for binding arbitration, and waiver thereof, 24
A.L.R.3d 1325.
Notes of Decisions
Dalton v. Santander Consum. USA, Inc., 2016-NMSC-035, 385 P.3d 619.
· cites it 2× “” NMSA 1978, § 44-7A-5 (2001). Both parties benefit from the economy and efficiency of a small claims court when either party has a claim worth less than $10,000.”
Figueroa v. Thi of New Mexico, 2013-NMCA-077, 4 N.M. 378.
· cites it 3× “¶ 13 (citing NMSA 1978, § 44-7A-1(b)(4)(f) (2001) and § 44-7A-5 (2001)). 2 The New Mexico Supreme Court noted that the statute may have been preempted by the FAA because it specifically singled out arbitration agreements, but nevertheless, the Court reasoned that the statute was…”
Figueroa v. THI of New Mexico, 2013-NMCA-077.
· cites it 3× “2 The New Mexico Supreme Court noted that the statute may have been preempted 2 Section 44-7A-5 states: “In the arbitration of a dispute between a consumer, borrower, tenant or employee and another party, a disabling civil dispute clause contained in a document relevant to the…”
Figueroa v. THI of NM at Casa Arena Blanca, LLC, No. 30,477 (N.M. Ct. App. July 18, 2012).
· cites it 3× “2 The New Mexico Supreme Court noted that the statute may have been preempted 2 Section 44-7A-5 states: “In the arbitration of a dispute between a consumer, borrower, tenant or employee and another party, a disabling civil dispute clause contained in a document relevant to the…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.