New Mexico Statutes
N.M. Stat. § 5-14-2 (2026)
Definitions.
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
NM-LEGnmonesource.com
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
As used in the Civic and Convention Center Funding Act:
A. "convention center fee" means the fee imposed by a local government entity
pursuant to the Civic and Convention Center Funding Act on vendees for the use of
lodging facilities;
B. "county" means a county within which a qualified municipality is located;
C. "local governmental entity" means a qualified municipality or a county authorized
by the Civic and Convention Center Funding Act to impose convention center fees;
D. "lodging facility" means a hotel, motel or motor hotel, a bed and breakfast facility,
an inn, a resort or other facility offering rooms for payment of rent or other
consideration;
E. "qualified municipality" means an incorporated municipality that has a population
of more than fifty thousand but less than seventy thousand according to the most recent
federal decennial census and that is located in a class A county;
F. "room" means a unit of a lodging facility, such as a hotel room;
G. "vendee" means a person who rents or pays consideration to a vendor for use of
a room; and
H. "vendor" means a person or his agent who furnishes rooms for occupancy for
consideration.
History: Laws 2003, ch. 374, § 2.
5-14-3. Authorized local governmental entities.
The following local governmental entities are authorized to impose a convention
center fee:
A. a qualified municipality if the governing body of the qualified municipality has by
resolution authorized the development and construction of a civic and convention center
within the qualified municipality; and
B. a county, provided that:
(1) a qualified municipality within the county has enacted an ordinance to
impose a convention center fee; and
(2) the qualified municipality and the county have entered into a joint powers
agreement pursuant to the Joint Powers Agreements Act [11-1-1 to 11-1-7 NMSA 1978]
to collect the revenue from the convention center fee and to expend the revenue as
required in the Civic and Convention Center Funding Act.
History: Laws 2003, ch. 374, § 3.Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1
case, 1980–1980 · leading case: Methola v. Cnty. of Eddy, 622 P.2d 234 (N.M. 1980).
Methola v. Cnty. of Eddy, 622 P.2d 234 (N.M. 1980). “In Section 5-14-2(A) of the Act, the Legislature recognized the “inherently unfair and inequitable results which occur in the strict application of the doctrine of sovereign immunity.”
— N.M. Stat. § 5-14-2(A) — 1 case
Methola v. Cnty. of Eddy, 622 P.2d 234 (N.M. 1980). “In Section 5-14-2(A) of the Act, the Legislature recognized the “inherently unfair and inequitable results which occur in the strict application of the doctrine of sovereign immunity.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.