New Mexico Statutes
N.M. Stat. § 57-15-1 (2026)
False advertising unlawful
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
NM-LEGnmonesource.com
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
False advertising in the conduct of any business, trade or commerce or in the furnishing of any service in this state is hereby declared unlawful.
History: 1953 Comp., § 49-12-1, enacted by Laws 1965, ch. 79, § 1. ANNOTATIONS
Am. Jur. 2d, A.L.R. and C.J.S. references. — 3 Am. Jur. 2d Advertising §§ 3, 7 et seq.
Validity, construction, and application of statutes or ordinances directed against false or fraudulent statements in advertisements, 89 A.L.R. 1004.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5
cases (3 in the last 5 years), 2008–2024 · leading case: Fiser v. Dell Comput. Corp., 188 P.3d 1215 (N.M. 2008).
Fiser v. Dell Comput. Corp., 188 P.3d 1215 (N.M. 2008). “He alleges violations of the New Mexico Unfair Practices Act (UPA), NMSA 1978, Sections 57-12-1 to -26 (1967, as amended through 2003), the New Mexico False Advertising Act, NMSA 1978, Sections 57-15-1 to -10 (1965), the New Mexico Uniform Commercial Code (UCC), NMSA 1978,…”
Johnson & Johnson v. Wilson, 563 P.3d 841 (N.M. 2024). “and also include claims arising under the New Mexico Unfair Practices Act, NMSA 1978, §§ 57-12-1 to -26 (1967, as amended through 2019); the New Mexico Medicaid Fraud Act, NMSA 1978, §§ 30-44-1 to -8 (1989, as amended through 2004); the New Mexico Fraud Against Taxpayers Act,…”
Wetzel v. Diestel Turkey Ranch (D.N.M. 2023). “Second, Plaintiff claims that Defendant falsely advertised its turkey products in violation of the New Mexico False Advertising Act (NMFAA), NMSA 1978, § 57-15-1 et seq. Doc. 1 at 40.”
Buscema v. Wal-Mart Stores East LP (D.N.M. 2020). “; and (2) the New Mexico False Advertising Act (“FAA”), NMSA 1978 § 57-15-1 et seq. Id. at ¶¶ 18–20.”
Johnson & Johnson v. Wilson (N.M. 2024). “…NMSA 1978, §§ 44-9-1 to -14 (2007, as amended through 11 2015); and the New Mexico False Advertising Act, NMSA 1978, Section 57-15-1 12 to -10 (1965, as amended through 1967). 13 {3} The State’s amended complaint references six state executive agencies not 14 named as parties…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.