N.M. Stat. » Chapter 57 — Trade Practices and Regulations
New Mexico Statutes

N.M. Stat. § 57-3-1 (2026)

Repealed

✓ laws through the 2025 session (retrieved May 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NM-LEGnmonesource.com JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

History: 1953 Comp., § 49-4-6, enacted by Laws 1969, ch. 142, § 1; repealed by Laws 1997, ch. 197, § 17.

ANNOTATIONS

Repeals. — Laws 1997, ch. 197, § 17 repealed 57-3-1 NMSA 1978, as enacted by Laws 1969, ch. 142, § 1, relating to the short title, effective July 1, 1997. For provisions of former section, see the 1996 NMSA 1978 on NMOneSource.com. For present comparable provisions, see Chapter 57, Article 3B NMSA 1978.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1985–1993 · leading case: Jordache Enter., Inc. v. Hogg Wyld, Ltd., 625 F. Supp. 48 (D.N.M. 1985).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Jordache Enter., Inc. v. Hogg Wyld, Ltd., 625 F. Supp. 48 (D.N.M. 1985). · cites it 4× “…, 1114 and 1125 (the Lanham Act), common law trademark infringement, and violation of the New Mexico Trademark Act, N.M.Stat.Ann. §§ 57-3-1 et seq. (1978), specifically § 57-3-10, the New Mexico “anti-dilution” statute. Defendants have counterclaimed requesting a declaratory…”
S & S Investments, Inc. v. Hooper Enter., Ltd., 862 P.2d 1252 (N.M. Ct. App. 1993). “This is a trade name infringement case requiring interpretation of New Mexico’s Trademark Act, NMSA 1978, Sections 57-3-1 to -12 (Repl.Pamp.1987 & Cum.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.