History: Laws 1986, ch. 7, § 1; 2003, ch. 247, § 1; repealed by Laws 2009, ch. 82, §
703.
ANNOTATIONS
Repeals. — Laws 2009, ch. 82, § 703 repealed 58-13B-1 NMSA 1978, as enacted by
Laws 1986, ch. 7, § 1, relating to the short title of the New Mexico Securities Act of
1986, effective January 1, 2010. For provisions of the former section, see the 2009
NMSA 1978 on NMOneSource.com. For present comparable provisions, see the New
Mexico Uniform Securities Act, 58-13C-101 to 58-13C-701 NMSA 1978.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
12
cases, 1986–2016 · leading case:
State v. Collins, 2007-NMCA-106, 166 P.3d 480.
State v. Collins, 2007-NMCA-106, 166 P.3d 480.
· cites it 2× “OPINION {1} Defendant appeals his convictions for multiple counts of securities fraud and the sale of unregistered securities, contrary to the New Mexico Securities Act of 1986, NMSA 1978, §§ 58-13B-1 to -57 (1986, as amended through 2004) (Securities Act).”
State v. Rivera, 2009-NMCA-132, 223 P.3d 951.
· cites it 2× “The director of the New Mexico Securities Division summarized the purposes of the Securities Act of 1986, NMSA 1978, §§ 58-13B-1 to -57 (1986, as amended through 2003) (repealed 2009), and gave definitions of a “security” and a “Ponzi scheme.”
State v. Kirby, 2003-NMCA-074, 70 P.3d 772.
· cites it 2× “3d 264 , should be applied to preclude imposition of both civil and criminal penalties under the New Mexico Securities Act of 1986, NMSA 1978, §§ 58-13B-1 to -57 (1986, as amended through 1999) [hereinafter Securities Act or the Act], for the same conduct.”
State v. Maxwell, 2016-NMCA-082, 10 N.M. 463.
· cites it 2× “icted of four counts each of fraud, contrary to NMSA 1978, Section 30-16-6 (2006); three counts each of securities fraud, contrary to NMSA 1978, Section 58-13B-30 (1986) (repealed 2009); and three counts each of transacting business as a broker-dealer without a license, contrary…”
Ballengee v. New Mexico Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass'n, 786 P.2d 37 (N.M. 1990).
· cites it 6× “In its findings of fact and conclusions of law dated October 25, 1988, the court found, inter alia: The investment scheme and the $37,000 promissory note from [DIS] to [the Ballengees] was a security transaction, as a security is defined by Section 58-13B-1 et. seq. [sic]. The…”
Frederick v. Sun 1031, LLC, 2012-NMCA-118, 293 P.3d 934.
· cites it 2× “Frederick thereafter amended his complaint to allege only violations of the New Mexico Securities Act of 1986, NMSA 1978, § 58-13B-1 to -57 (1986, as amended through 2004) (repealed 2010) (Securities Act).”
State v. Ramos, 860 P.2d 765 (N.M. Ct. App. 1993).
· cites it 2× “NMSA 1978, §§ 58-13B-1 to -56 (Repl.Pamp.”
State v. Soutar, 2012-NMCA-024, 1 N.M. Ct. App. 321.
“BACKGROUND 1 {2} Defendant was tried and convicted of multiple violations of the New Mexico Securities Act of 1986, NMSA 1978, Sections 58-13B-1 to -57 (1986, as amended through 2003) (repealed 2009), and one count of racketeering in violation of NMSA 1978, Section 30-42-4…”
State v. Shade, 726 P.2d 864 (N.M. Ct. App. 1986).
“The new Act, which repealed the old, is found at NMSA 1978, Sections 58-13B-1 to -56 (Repl.Pamp.1986).”
Stone v. Fossil Oil & Gas, 657 F. Supp. 1449 (D.N.M. 1987).
“The Court notes that this Act has now been superseded by the New Mexico Securities Act of 1986, § 58-13B-1 et seq. NMSA (Repl.Pamp. 1986), effective July 1, 1986.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.