N.M. Stat. » Chapter 6 — Public Finances
New Mexico Statutes

N.M. Stat. § 6-4-13 (2026)

Requirements

✓ laws through the 2025 session (retrieved May 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NM-LEGnmonesource.com JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

A. Any tobacco product manufacturer selling cigarettes to consumers within the state (whether directly or through a distributor, retailer or similar intermediary or intermediaries) after the date of enactment of this act shall do one of the following:

(1) become a participating manufacturer (as that term is defined in section II(jj) of the master settlement agreement) and generally perform its financial obligations under the master settlement agreement; or (2) place into a qualified escrow fund by April 15 of the year following the year in question the following amounts (as such amounts are adjusted for inflation):

(a) 1999: $.0094241 per unit sold after the date of enactment of this act;

(b) 2000: $.0104712 per unit sold;

(c) for each of 2001 and 2002: $.0136125 per unit sold;

(d) for each of 2003 through 2006: $.0167539 per unit sold; and

(e) for each of 2007 and each year thereafter: $.0188482 per unit sold.

B. A tobacco product manufacturer that places funds into escrow pursuant to Paragraph (2) of Subsection A of this section shall receive the interest or other appreciation on such funds as earned. Such funds themselves shall be released from escrow only under the following circumstances:

(1) to pay a judgment or settlement on any released claim brought against such tobacco product manufacturer by the state or any releasing party located or residing in the state. Funds shall be released from escrow under this paragraph:

(a) in the order in which they were placed into escrow; and

(b) only to the extent and at the time necessary to make payments required under such judgment or settlement;

(2) to the extent that a tobacco product manufacturer establishes that the amount it was required to place into escrow on account of units sold in the state in a particular year was greater than the master settlement agreement payments, as determined pursuant to section IX(i) of that agreement, including after final determination of all adjustments, that such manufacturer would have been required to make an account of such units sold had it been a participating manufacturer, the excess shall be released from escrow and revert back to such tobacco product manufacturer; or

(3) to the extent not released from escrow under Paragraphs (1) or (2) of this subsection, funds shall be released from escrow and revert back to such tobacco product manufacturer twenty-five years after the date on which they were placed into escrow.

C. Each tobacco product manufacturer that elects to place funds into escrow pursuant to Paragraph (2) of Subsection A of this section shall annually certify to the attorney general that it is in compliance with Paragraph (2) of Subsection A of this section and Subsection B of this section. The attorney general may bring a civil action on behalf of the state against any tobacco product manufacturer that fails to place into escrow the funds required under Paragraph (2) of Subsection A of this section and Subsection B of this section. Any tobacco product manufacturer that fails in any year to place into escrow the funds required under Paragraph (2) of Subsection A of this section and Subsection B of this section shall:

(1) be required within fifteen days to place such funds into escrow as shall bring it into compliance with Paragraph (2) of Subsection A of this section and Subsection B of this section. The court, upon a finding of a violation of Paragraph (2) of Subsection A of this section or Subsection B of this section, may impose a civil penalty to be paid to the state general fund in an amount not to exceed five percent of the amount improperly withheld from escrow per day of the violation and in a total amount not to exceed one hundred percent of the original amount improperly withheld from escrow;

(2) in the case of a knowing violation, be required within fifteen days to place such funds into escrow as shall bring it into compliance with Paragraph (2) of Subsection A of this section and Subsection B of this section. The court, upon a finding of a knowing violation of Paragraph (2) of Subsection A of this section or Subsection B of this section, may impose a civil penalty to be paid to the state general fund in an amount not to exceed fifteen percent of the amount improperly withheld from escrow per day of the violation and in a total amount not to exceed three hundred percent of the original amount improperly withheld from escrow; and

(3) in the case of a second knowing violation, be prohibited from selling cigarettes to consumers within the state (whether directly or through a distributor, retailer or similar intermediary) for a period not to exceed two years.

Each failure to make an annual deposit required under Paragraph (2) of Subsection A of this section shall constitute a separate violation.

History: Laws 1999, ch. 208, § 2; 2004, ch. 90, § 1.

ANNOTATIONS

The 2004 amendment, effective May 19, 2004, amended Paragraph (2) of Subsection B by deleting "in a particular year was greater than the state's allocable share of the total payments that such manufacturer would have been required to make in that year under the master settlement agreement (as determined pursuant to section IX(i)(2) of the master settlement agreement, and before any of the adjustments or offsets described in section IX(i)(3) of that agreement other than the inflation adjustment)" and inserting in its place: "on account of units sold in the state in a particular year was greater than the master settlement agreement payments, as determined pursuant to section IX(i) of that agreement, including after final determination of all adjustments, that such manufacturer would have been required to make an account of such units sold".

Arbitration of diligent enforcement. — The Master Settlement Agreement with tobacco products manufacturers requires that the state submit the issue of its diligent enforcement of its qualifying statute to arbitration before a single, nationwide arbitration panel. State of N.M. ex rel. King v. Am. Tobacco Co., Inc., 2008-NMCA-142, 145 N.M. 134, 194 P.3d 749.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2014–2023 · leading case: State ex rel. New Mexico Off. of the Attorney Gen. v. Grand River Enter. Six Nations, Ltd., 2014-NMCA-073, 6 N.M. 383.
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State ex rel. New Mexico Off. of the Attorney Gen. v. Grand River Enter. Six Nations, Ltd., 2014-NMCA-073, 6 N.M. 383. · cites it 2× “NMSA 1978, § 6-4-13(C) (2004). The Attorney General alleged that Grand River owed approximately $327.”
State ex rel. Att'y Gen. v. Grand River Enters. Six Nations, Ltd., 2014-NMCA-073. · cites it 2× “NMSA 1978, § 6-4-13(C) (2004). The Attorney General alleged that Grand River owed approximately $327.”
Grand River v. N.M. Attny Gen., No. A-1-CA-38344 (N.M. Ct. App. Mar. 7, 2023). · cites it 8× “’” (emphasis added) (quoting Section 6-4-13(C)). But when the partially quoted sentence is read in its entirety, Section 6-4-13(C) does not direct—i.”
Sandia Tobacco Mfrs., Inc., a New Mexico Dom. Profit, No. 16-12335 (Bankr. D.N.M. July 26, 2019). · cites it 2× “1978 § 6-4-13(A)(2) (requiring any tobacco product manufacturer selling cigarettes to consumers within the state to either become a participating manufacturer of the MS0A, or place funds into a “qualified escrow fund”).”
Debtor Test, No. 55-10000 (Bankr. D.N.M. July 27, 2019). · cites it 2× “1978 § 6-4-13(A)(2) (requiring any tobacco product manufacturer selling cigarettes to consumers within the state to either become a participating manufacturer of the MS0A, or place funds into a “qualified escrow fund”).”
N.M. Stat. § 6-4-13(A)(2): 2 cases
Sandia Tobacco Mfrs., Inc., a New Mexico Dom. Profit, No. 16-12335 (Bankr. D.N.M. July 26, 2019). “1978 § 6-4-13(A)(2) (requiring any tobacco product manufacturer selling cigarettes to consumers within the state to either become a participating manufacturer of the MS0A, or place funds into a “qualified escrow fund”).”
Debtor Test, No. 55-10000 (Bankr. D.N.M. July 27, 2019). “1978 § 6-4-13(A)(2) (requiring any tobacco product manufacturer selling cigarettes to consumers within the state to either become a participating manufacturer of the MS0A, or place funds into a “qualified escrow fund”).”
N.M. Stat. § 6-4-13(B)(1): 2 cases
Sandia Tobacco Mfrs., Inc., a New Mexico Dom. Profit, No. 16-12335 (Bankr. D.N.M. July 26, 2019). “1978 § 6-4-13(A)(2) (requiring any tobacco product manufacturer selling cigarettes to consumers within the state to either become a participating manufacturer of the MS0A, or place funds into a “qualified escrow fund”).”
Debtor Test, No. 55-10000 (Bankr. D.N.M. July 27, 2019). “1978 § 6-4-13(A)(2) (requiring any tobacco product manufacturer selling cigarettes to consumers within the state to either become a participating manufacturer of the MS0A, or place funds into a “qualified escrow fund”).”
N.M. Stat. § 6-4-13(C): 3 cases
State ex rel. New Mexico Off. of the Attorney Gen. v. Grand River Enter. Six Nations, Ltd., 2014-NMCA-073, 6 N.M. 383. “NMSA 1978, § 6-4-13(C) (2004). The Attorney General alleged that Grand River owed approximately $327.”
State ex rel. Att'y Gen. v. Grand River Enters. Six Nations, Ltd., 2014-NMCA-073. “NMSA 1978, § 6-4-13(C) (2004). The Attorney General alleged that Grand River owed approximately $327.”
Grand River v. N.M. Attny Gen., No. A-1-CA-38344 (N.M. Ct. App. Mar. 7, 2023). “’” (emphasis added) (quoting Section 6-4-13(C)). But when the partially quoted sentence is read in its entirety, Section 6-4-13(C) does not direct—i.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.