N.M. Stat. » N.M. Stat. / Chapter 61 / Article 2
New Mexico Statutes

N.M. Stat. § 61-2-10 (2026)

Repealed.

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NM-LEGnmonesource.com JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar 
History: 1953 Comp., § 67-1-8.1, enacted by Laws 1977, ch. 30, § 3; 1985, ch. 241, §
4; 1995, ch. 20, § 4; repealed by Laws 2015, ch. 131, § 7.

                                      ANNOTATIONS

Repeals. — Laws 2015, ch. 131, § 7 repealed 61-2-10 NMSA 1978, as enacted by
Laws 1977, ch. 30, § 3, relating to certification for use of topical ocular pharmaceutical
agents, display, effective June 19, 2015. For provisions of former section, see the 2014
NMSA 1978 on NMOneSource.com.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7 cases, 1956–1988 · leading case: Molina v. McQuinn, 758 P.2d 798 (N.M. 1988).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Molina v. McQuinn, 758 P.2d 798 (N.M. 1988). · cites it 9× “at § 61-2-10. In June 1985, Molina enrolled in a 105 hour course at Pennsylvania College of Pharmacology to be certified pursuant to section 61-2-10.”
Martinez v. Rsch. Park, Inc., 410 P.2d 200 (N.M. 1965). · cites it 2× “The parties stipulated that the claims of liens were in proper form; that they stated the correct amounts due; that they were timely filed; and that the only issue before the trial court was whether a non-responsibility notice was posted by Research Park, Inc.”
Franklin's Earthmoving, Inc. v. Loma Linda Park, Inc., 395 P.2d 454 (N.M. 1964). · cites it 2× “The -statute, § 61-2-10, N.M.S.A.1953, makes all lands upon which improvements are constructed with the owner’s knowledge subject to mechanic’s and materialmen’s liens unless one having an interest in the land shall post a notice of non-responsibility within three days after…”
Boone v. Smith, 447 P.2d 23 (N.M. 1968). “On the other hand, the appellees rely on § 61-2-10, N.M.S.A. 1953, which states: “Every building or other improvement mentioned in the second section of this article [61-2-2], constructed upon any lands with the knowledge of the owner or the person having or claiming any…”
Butt v. Vermejo Park Corp., 556 P.2d 835 (N.M. 1976). · cites it 2× “” The argument of Butt Bros, is (1) that this expresses a clear legislative intent that the lien provisions of the Oil Act were not in any way to affect, modify or repeal the provisions of § 61-2-10 of the Mechanics’ Act; (2) that every improvement mentioned in § 61-2-2 of the…”
Hill v. Long, 299 P.2d 472 (N.M. 1956). “” At all times the defendant Long held legal title and knew the work was being done and, as was said above, went upon the property while work was being done and at times made suggestions as to the method of doing the work.”
Cardinal Fence Co. v. Karavas, 430 P.2d 103 (N.M. 1967). “The applicable statute, § 61-2-10, N.M.S.A.1953, reads: “Every building or other improvement mentioned in the second section of this article [61-2-2], constructed upon any lands with the knowledge of the owner or the person having or claiming any interest therein, shall be held…”
N.M. Stat. § 61-2-10(0): 1 case
Molina v. McQuinn, 758 P.2d 798 (N.M. 1988). “at § 61-2-10. In June 1985, Molina enrolled in a 105 hour course at Pennsylvania College of Pharmacology to be certified pursuant to section 61-2-10.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.