New Mexico Statutes
N.M. Stat. § 61-7-9 (2026)
Reinstatement of license.
✓ laws through the 2025 session (retrieved May 2026)
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
NM-LEGnmonesource.com
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
A health care provider whose license, registration or certification has been restricted,
suspended or revoked pursuant to provisions of the Impaired Health Care Provider Act,
voluntarily or by action of the board, shall have a right, at reasonable intervals, to
petition for reinstatement and to demonstrate that the health care provider can resume
the competent practice with reasonable skill and safety to patients. Petition shall be
made in writing and on a form prescribed by the board. Action of the board on the
petition shall be initiated by referral to and examination by an examining committee
pursuant to the provisions of Sections 61-7-4 and 61-7-5 NMSA 1978. The board may,
in its discretion and upon written recommendation of the examining committee, restore
the license, registration or certification of the health care provider on a general or limited
basis.
History: 1953 Comp., § 67-42-9, enacted by Laws 1976, ch. 3, § 9; recompiled as 1953
Comp., § 67-8A-9; 1993, ch. 326, § 6; 1995, ch. 96, § 9.
ANNOTATIONS
The 1995 amendment, effective June 16, 1995, substituted "health care provider" for
"physician" throughout the section; inserted "registration or certification" in two places;
and made minor stylistic changes throughout the section.
The 1993 amendment, effective June 18, 1993, made stylistic changes throughout the
section.
Am. Jur. 2d, A.L.R. and C.J.S. references. — 61 Am. Jur. 2d Physicians, Surgeons
and Other Healers §§ 74 to 120.
70 C.J.S. Physicians, Surgeons, and Other Health-Care Providers § 52.Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2
cases, 1978–1984 · leading case: New Mexico Bank & Trust Co. v. Lucas Bros., 582 P.2d 379 (N.M. 1978).
New Mexico Bank & Trust Co. v. Lucas Bros., 582 P.2d 379 (N.M. 1978). “The issue considered in this appeal has been resolved in future cases by the Legislature through the enactment in 1975 of § 61-7-9, N.M.S.A.1953 (Supp.1975), which provides as follows: Every mortgage or other instrument securing a loan upon real estate and constituting a lien,…”
In re Davis, 44 B.R. 88 (Bankr. D.N.M. 1984). “48-7-9 (1978) (then § 61-7-9) although the statute was not directly applicable as the case had arisen before the effective date of the statute.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.