N.M. Stat. » Chapter 77 — Animals and Livestock
New Mexico Statutes

N.M. Stat. § 77-9-30 (2026)

Exported livestock; inspection of brands and ear marks;

✓ laws through the 2025 session (retrieved May 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NM-LEGnmonesource.com JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

record. The board shall cause the brands and ear marks upon livestock shipped or driven from a district or out of this state to be inspected and a true and correct record of the result of such inspections to be kept in the office of the director for three years. The record shall set forth the date of the inspection; the place where and the person by whom made; the name and current address of the owner, shipper or claimant of the livestock inspected or the names and current addresses of all persons in charge of the livestock at the time of the inspection; the destination of the livestock; a list of all brands and ear marks upon the livestock inspected; and the number and classification of the livestock.

History: Laws 1891, ch. 34, § 3; C.L. 1897, § 209; Code 1915, § 144; C.S. 1929, § 4- 1430; 1941 Comp., § 49-927; 1953 Comp., § 47-9-27; Laws 1993, ch. 248, § 61; 1999, ch. 282, § 56.

ANNOTATIONS The 1999 amendment, effective July 1, 1999, inserted "from a district or" and "for three years" in the first sentence; substituted "current address" and "current addresses" for "post office addresses" in the second sentence; and made stylistic changes throughout the section.

The 1993 amendment, effective June 18, 1993, added the current catchline; in the first sentence, deleted "sanitary" preceding "board" and substituted "director of the board" for "secretary of said sanitary board" at the end; and made minor stylistic changes.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 2013–2022 · leading case: Bartlett v. Cameron, 2014-NMSC-002, 5 N.M. 312.
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Bartlett v. Cameron, 2014-NMSC-002, 5 N.M. 312. · cites it 5× “16, § 164 (codified as NMSA 1953, § 77-9-30 (1967)), it has been amended ten times, see § 22-11-31.”
State v. Torres, 521 P.3d 77 (N.M. 2022). · cites it 2× “See NMSA 1978, § 77-9-30 (1999). The inspector contacted an area supervisor from the New Mexico Livestock Board and reported the suspected theft.”
Bartlett v. Cameron, 2014-NMSC-002. · cites it 5× “16, § 164 (codified as NMSA 1953, § 77-9-30 (1967)), it has been amended ten times, see § 22-11-31.”
State v. Torres (N.M. 2022). · cites it 2× “See NMSA 1978, § 77-9-30 (1999). 3 The inspector contacted an area supervisor from the New Mexico Livestock Board 4 and reported the suspected theft.”
N.M. Stat. § 77-9-30(A): 2 cases
Bartlett v. Cameron, 2014-NMSC-002, 5 N.M. 312. “16, § 164 (codified as NMSA 1953, § 77-9-30 (1967)), it has been amended ten times, see § 22-11-31.”
Bartlett v. Cameron, 2014-NMSC-002. “16, § 164 (codified as NMSA 1953, § 77-9-30 (1967)), it has been amended ten times, see § 22-11-31.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.