N.Y. Laws » CHAPTER Correction / ARTICLE Community Supervision
New York Consolidated Laws

N.Y. Correction Law § 210 (2026)

Permitted activities

✓ text as retrieved May 2026 (this copy records no edition or section history)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NY-LEGnysenate.gov Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar 
§ 210. Permitted activities. Where any person is granted presumptive
release, parole, conditional release or release to post-release
supervision, such person shall not be deemed to be in violation of and
the department shall not terminate such granted presumptive release,
parole, conditional release or release to post-release supervision
solely because such person participated in work related labor protests,
or in a lawful labor dispute, strike or other concerted stoppage of work
or slowdown pursuant to article twenty of the labor law or the national
labor relations act (29 U.S.C. sections 151 et. seq.).
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1968–1976 · leading case: Thomas Palermo & Sheldon Saltzman v. Warden, Green Haven State Prison, & Russell Oswald, 545 F.2d 286 (2d Cir. 1976).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Thomas Palermo & Sheldon Saltzman v. Warden, Green Haven State Prison, & Russell Oswald, 545 F.2d 286 (2d Cir. 1976). “N.Y. Correction Law § 210 (McKinney’s Supp.”
United States Ex Rel. Randazzo v. Follette, 282 F. Supp. 10 (S.D.N.Y. 1968). · cites it 2× “” Correction Law § 210. The Parole Board is directed to release on parole “only if * * * of opinion that there is a reasonable probability that * * * he will live and remain at liberty without violating the law * * * ”.”
Joseph Menechino v. Russell G. Oswald, as Chairman of the New York State Bd. of Parole, New Yorkstate Bd. of Parole, 430 F.2d 403 (2d Cir. 1970). “Toward this purpose the members have the duty of meeting at such prisons and at such times as are necessary for a full study of the cases of prisoners eligible for release on parole and of determining “when and under what conditions and to whom such parole may be granted” (N. Y.…”
Bell v. Oswald, 305 F. Supp. 878 (S.D.N.Y. 1969). “N.Y. Correction Law § 210 et seq. The New York statute sets v.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.