New York Consolidated Laws
N.Y. Correction Law § 504 (2026)
Designation of substitute jail
✓ text as retrieved May 2026 (this copy records no edition or section history)
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
NY-LEGnysenate.gov
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
§ 504. Designation of substitute jail. 1. (a) If there is no jail in a county, or the jail becomes unfit or unsafe for the confinement of some or all of the incarcerated individuals, civil or criminal, or is destroyed by fire or otherwise, or if a pestilential disease breaks out in the jail or in the vicinity of the jail and the physician to the jail certifies that it is likely to endanger the health of any or all of the incarcerated individuals in the jail, the state commission of correction, upon application, must, by an instrument in writing, filed with the clerk of the county, designate another suitable place within the county, or the jail of any other county, for the confinement of some or all of the incarcerated individuals, as the case requires. The place so designated thereupon becomes, to all intents and purposes, except as otherwise prescribed in this article, the jail of the county for which it has been so designated, and the purposes expressed in the instrument designating the same. The designation may be amended, modified or revoked by the state commission of correction by a subsequent instrument in writing filed with the clerk of the county. (b) If transfer to the jail of another county would allow for an incarcerated individual's participation in beneficial programming, the state commission of correction, upon application and the consent of such incarcerated individual and any involved sheriff, may, by an instrument in writing, filed with the clerk of the county, designate the jail of such other county, for the confinement of such incarcerated individual, as the case requires. The jail so designated thereupon becomes, to all intents and purposes, except as otherwise prescribed in this article, the jail of the county for which it has been so designated, and the purposes expressed in the instrument designating the same. The designation may be amended, modified or revoked by the state commission of correction by a subsequent instrument in writing filed with the clerk of the county. 2. Where the jail in a county becomes unfit or unsafe for the confinement of some or all of the incarcerated individuals due to an incarcerated individual disturbance or other extraordinary circumstances, including but not limited to a natural disaster, unanticipated deficiencies in the structural integrity of a facility or the inability to provide one or more incarcerated individuals with essential services such as medical care, upon the request of the municipal official as defined in subdivision four of section forty of this chapter and no other suitable place within the county nor the jail of any other county is immediately available to house some or all of the incarcerated individuals, the commissioner of corrections and community supervision may, in his or her sole discretion, make available, upon such terms and conditions as he or she may deem appropriate, all or any part of a state correctional institution for the confinement of some or all of such incarcerated individuals as an adjunct to the county jail for a period not to exceed thirty days. However, if the county jail remains unfit or unsafe for the confinement of some or all of such incarcerated individuals beyond thirty days, the state commission of correction, with the consent of the commissioner of corrections and community supervision, may extend the availability of a state correctional institution for one or more additional thirty day periods. The state commission of correction shall promulgate rules and regulations governing the temporary transfer of incarcerated individuals to state correctional institutions from county jails, including but not limited to provisions for confinement of such incarcerated individuals in the nearest correctional facility, to the maximum extent practicable, taking into account necessary security. The commissioner of corrections and community supervision may, in his or her sole discretion, based on standards promulgated by the department, determine whether a county shall reimburse the state for any or all of the actual costs of confinement as approved by the director of the division of the budget. On or before the expiration of each thirty day period, the state commission of correction must make an appropriate designation pursuant to subdivision one of this section if the county jail remains unfit or unsafe for the confinement of some or all of the incarcerated individuals and consent to the continued availability of a state correctional institution as required for herein. The superintendence, management and control of a state correctional institution or part thereof made available pursuant hereto and the incarcerated individuals housed therein shall be as directed by the commissioner of corrections and community supervision. 3. The county clerk must serve a copy of the designation, duly certified by him or her, under his or her official seal, on the sheriff and keeper of the jail of the county designated. The sheriff of that county must, upon the delivery of the sheriff of the county for which the designation is made, receive into his or her jail, and there safely keep, all persons who may be lawfully confined therein, pursuant to this article; and he or she is responsible for their safekeeping, as if he or she was sheriff of the county for which the designation is made. 4. In any county where a jail is under the jurisdiction of a commissioner of correction the term sheriff as set forth in this section shall be deemed to mean the commissioner of correction of such county. 5. As provided in this section, any designation of the state commission of correction, or any amendment, modification or revocation thereto, may be issued by the commission, any member, or any attorney employed by the commission.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1983–2022 · leading case: Ayers v. Coughlin, 137 A.D.2d 300 (N.Y. App. Div. 1st Dep't 1988).
Ayers v. Coughlin, 137 A.D.2d 300 (N.Y. App. Div. 1st Dep't 1988). “To the extent that the counterclaim seeks to direct petitioners to obtain permission to designate substitute jails pursuant to Correction Law § 504, it is likewise without merit.”
Rose v. Goldrick, 130 A.D.2d 564 (N.Y. App. Div. 2d Dep't 1987). “Due to overcrowded conditions at the Rockland County Jail, the New York State Commission of Correction designated the Erie County Holding Center as a substitute jail, pursuant to the authority vested in it by Correction Law § 504 (2) to designate such substitute facilities upon…”
Benjamin v. Malcolm, 803 F.2d 46 (2d Cir. 1986). “1986), we noted that the Nassau County Correctional Center officials might well be able to comply with the court’s earlier population cap order by applying to the State for an alternative place of confinement for prisoners in excess of the population cap, pursuant to N.Y.…”
Howell v. McGinity, 129 A.D.2d 60 (N.Y. App. Div. 2d Dep't 1987). “It is now settled that the provisions of Correction Law § 504 (1) are applicable to conditions resulting from overcrowding (see, Matter of Adams v Meloni, 63 NY2d 868 ).”
George v. Goldrick, 136 Misc. 2d 258 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1987). “Transfer to a substitute jail is authorized under certain conditions pursuant to Correction Law § 504 (2). Transferring *264 sentenced prisoners to other facilities because of overcrowding at the jail was recently upheld by the Appellate Division, Second Department.”
Dozier v. Attica Corr. Facility, No. 6:20-cv-06628 (W.D.N.Y. Jan. 7, 2022). “On January 2, 2019, a written Memorandum and Judgment was issued that found Plaintiff’s transfer to Attica “in accordance with Corrections Law § 504 and the applicable regulations,” and that Plaintiff “had not shown that the Commission of Corrections exceeded its authority or…”
Black v. Delbello, 575 F. Supp. 28 (S.D.N.Y. 1983). “In the instant case, plaintiff was transferred pursuant to an order issued by the New York State Commission of Correction which it has the power to do pursuant to N.Y. Correct. Law § 504 (McKinney Supp. 1982-83).”
N.Y. Correction Law § 504(2): 1 case
Dozier v. Attica Corr. Facility, No. 6:20-cv-06628 (W.D.N.Y. Jan. 7, 2022). “On January 2, 2019, a written Memorandum and Judgment was issued that found Plaintiff’s transfer to Attica “in accordance with Corrections Law § 504 and the applicable regulations,” and that Plaintiff “had not shown that the Commission of Corrections exceeded its authority or…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.