New York Consolidated Laws
N.Y. Criminal Procedure Law § 670.10 (2026)
Use in a criminal proceeding of testimony given in a previous proceeding; when authorized
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
NY-LEGnysenate.gov
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
§ 670.10 Use in a criminal proceeding of testimony given in a previous proceeding; when authorized. 1. Under circumstances prescribed in this article, testimony given by a witness at (a) a trial of an accusatory instrument, or (b) a hearing upon a felony complaint conducted pursuant to section 180.60, or (c) an examination of such witness conditionally, conducted pursuant to article six hundred sixty, may, where otherwise admissible, be received into evidence at a subsequent proceeding in or relating to the action involved when at the time of such subsequent proceeding the witness is unable to attend the same by reason of death, illness or incapacity, or cannot with due diligence be found, or is outside the state or in federal custody and cannot with due diligence be brought before the court. Upon being received into evidence, such testimony may be read and any videotape or photographic recording thereof played. Where any recording is received into evidence, the stenographic transcript of that examination shall also be received. 2. The subsequent proceedings at which such testimony may be received in evidence consist of: (a) Any proceeding constituting a part of a criminal action based upon the charge or charges which were pending against the defendant at the time of the witness's testimony and to which such testimony related; and (b) Any post-judgment proceeding in which a judgment of conviction upon a charge specified in paragraph (a) is challenged.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4
cases (2 in the last 5 years), 2003–2024 · leading case: People v. Days, 131 A.D.3d 972 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015).
People v. Days, 131 A.D.3d 972 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015). “Criminal Procedure Law § 670.10 (1) codifies several exceptions to the right of confrontation, authorizing the use of prior trial testimony where a witness is unavailable due to death, illness, or incapacity, as well as in situations where the witness cannot with due diligence…”
People v. Dubarry, 2023 NY Slip Op 01804 (N.Y. App. Div. 2023). “25[2]) "by means of engaging in mutual combat with firearms in a public space." The defendant contends that the Supreme Court erred in admitting into evidence a certain witness's testimony from the defendant's prior trial on the same charges pursuant to Criminal Procedure Law §…”
In re Duane F., 309 A.D.2d 265 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003). “Criminal Procedure Law § 670.10 (1) states in relevant part that: “testimony given by a witness at (a) a trial of an accusatory instrument, or (b) a hearing upon a felony complaint conducted pursuant to section 180.”
Korsuntsev v. Melecio (E.D.N.Y 2024). “Believing they would be unable to secure Nicoletti’s appearance at the third trial, the prosecution moved under New York Criminal Procedure Law Section 670.10 to have Nicoletti’s testimony from the first trial read into evidence.”
— N.Y. Criminal Procedure Law § 670.10(1) — 1 case
People v. Dubarry, 2023 NY Slip Op 01804 (N.Y. App. Div. 2023). “25[2]) "by means of engaging in mutual combat with firearms in a public space." The defendant contends that the Supreme Court erred in admitting into evidence a certain witness's testimony from the defendant's prior trial on the same charges pursuant to Criminal Procedure Law §…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.