New York Consolidated Laws
N.Y. Civil Service Law § 65 (2026)
Provisional appointments
✓ text as retrieved May 2026 (this copy records no edition or section history)
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
NY-LEGnysenate.gov
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
§ 65. Provisional appointments. 1. Provisional appointments authorized. Whenever there is no appropriate eligible list available for filling a vacancy in the competitive class, the appointing officer may nominate a person to the state civil service department or municipal commission for non-competitive examination, and if such nominee shall be certified by such department or municipal commission as qualified after such non-competitive examination, he may be appointed provisionally to fill such vacancy until a selection and appointment can be made after competitive examination. Such non-competitive examination may consist of a review and evaluation of the training, experience and other qualifications of the nominee, without written, oral or other performance tests. 2. Time limitation on provisional appointments. No provisional appointment shall continue for a period in excess of nine months. The civil service department shall for competitive positions within its jurisdiction, and a municipal civil service commission shall for competitive positions within its jurisdiction, order a civil service examination for any position held by provisional appointment for a period of one month and such department or commission shall conduct a civil service examination, or see that such an examination is conducted, as soon as practicable thereafter, in order to prevent the provisional appointment from continuing for a period in excess of nine months. 3. Termination of provisional appointments. A provisional appointment to any position shall be terminated within two months following the establishment of an appropriate eligible list for filling vacancies in such positions; provided, however, that where there are a large number of provisional appointees in any department or agency in the service of the state or any civil division thereof to be replaced by permanent appointees from a newly established eligible list, and the appointing officer or body deems that the termination of the employment of all such provisional appointees within two months following establishment of such list would disrupt or impair essential public services, evidence thereof may be presented to the civil service department or municipal commission having jurisdiction which, after due inquiry, and upon finding that it is in the best interest of the public service, may waive the provisions of this subdivision requiring the termination of the employment of provisional appointees within two months following the establishment of an appropriate eligible list and authorize the termination of the employment of various numbers of such provisional appointees at stated intervals prescribed by such commission; provided, however, that in no case shall the employment of any such provisional appointee be continued longer than four months following the establishment of such eligible list. 4. Successive provisional appointments. Successive provisional appointments shall not be made to the same position after the expiration of the authorized period of the original provisional appointment to such position; provided, however, that where an examination for a position or group of positions fails to produce a list adequate to fill all positions then held on a provisional basis, or where such list is exhausted immediately following its establishment, a new provisional appointment may be made to any such position remaining unfilled by permanent appointment, and such new provisional appointment may, in the discretion of the appointing authority, be given to a current or former provisional appointee in such position, except that a current or former provisional appointee who becomes eligible for permanent appointment to any such position shall, if he is then to be continued in or appointed to any such position be afforded permanent appointment to such position.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 47
cases, 1975–2019 · leading case: City of Long Beach v. Civil Serv. Employees Ass'n, 867 N.E.2d 389 (N.Y. 2007).
City of Long Beach v. Civil Serv. Employees Ass'n, 867 N.E.2d 389 (N.Y. 2007). “With respect to provisional appointments, the Civil Service Law authorizes such appointments only when there is no eligible list available for filling a vacancy in a competitive class, and then only for a maximum period of nine months ( see Civil Service Law § 65 [1], *471 [2]).…”
Espinoza v. N.Y.C. Dep't of Transp., 304 F. Supp. 3d 374 (S.D. Ill. 2018). “" N.Y. Civil Serv. Law § 65 (3). Even if no eligible list was created, his employment could only continue for nine months.”
Lee v. Albany-Schoharie-Schenectady-Saratoga Bd. of Coop. Educ. Servs., 69 A.D.3d 1289 (N.Y. App. Div. 3d Dep't 2010). “It is undisputed that petitioner was a provisional employee (see Civil Service Law § 65). As such, she was subject to termination by BOCES “at any time without charges preferred, a statement of reasons given or a hearing held” (Matter of Preddice v Callanan, 69 NY2d 812, 814…”
Preddice v. Callanan, 506 N.E.2d 529 (N.Y. 1987). “Appointments made pursuant to Civil Service Law § 65 are provisional in nature; provisional employees have no expectation of tenure and rights attendant thereto except under the limited circumstances specified in Civil Service Law § 65 (4) (Matter of Becker v New York State Civ.”
City of Rome v. State of New York Pub. Emp. Relations Bd., 283 A.D.2d 817 (N.Y. App. Div. 3d Dep't 2001). “The Court’s actual holding is that, because appointments made pursuant to Civil Service Law § 65 are provisional in nature and provisional employees have no expectation of tenure and rights attendant thereto except under the limited circumstances specified in Civil Service Law §…”
Joyce v. Ortiz, 108 A.D.2d 158 (N.Y. App. Div. 1st Dep't 1985). “These provisional designations were made notwithstanding the existence of Civil Service Law § 65, which limits provisional appointments to nine months, requires that an examination be scheduled within one month of a provisional appointment and prohibits successive provisional…”
O'Connor v. Frawley, 175 A.D.2d 781 (N.Y. App. Div. 1st Dep't 1991). “Petitioner commenced an article 78 proceeding alleging that because respondents had failed to conduct a competitive civil service examination for more than 12 years, their termination *782 of petitioner’s position as a provisional Administrative Attorney was arbitrary and…”
Snyder v. Civil Serv. Comm'n, 132 A.D.2d 905 (N.Y. App. Div. 3d Dep't 1987). “Additionally, Civil Service Law § 65 (1) authorizes provisional appointments where "there is no appropriate eligible list available for filling a vacancy”.”
Gomez v. Hernandez, 50 A.D.3d 404 (N.Y. App. Div. 1st Dep't 2008). “A provisional appointment may ripen into a permanent appointment pursuant to Civil Service Law § 65 (4) (see Matter of Becker v New York State Civ.”
Bonacci v. Quinones, 124 A.D.2d 659 (N.Y. App. Div. 2d Dep't 1986). “Thus, the petitioner’s one-year probationary period pursuant to Education Law § 2509, 4 NYCRR 4.5 and New York City Department of Personnel Rules and Regulations 5.”
Eldridge v. Carmel Cent. Sch. Dist. Bd. of Educ., 82 A.D.3d 1147 (N.Y. App. Div. 2d Dep't 2011). “It is the obligation of the appointing authority to terminate all provisional appointments “within two months following the establishment of an appropriate eligible list for filling vacancies” (Civil Service Law § 65 [3]). The power of the civil service department and municipal…”
Aladin v. Schultz, 176 A.D.2d 205 (N.Y. App. Div. 1st Dep't 1991). “Civil Service Law § 65 establishes a time limitation of nine months for a provisional appointment (subd [2]) and a general rule that provisional appointments should be terminated within two months following establishment of an appropriate eligible list for filling vacancies in…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.