New York Consolidated Laws
N.Y. Civil Service Law § 72 (2026)
Leave for ordinary disability
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
NY-LEGnysenate.gov
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
§ 72. Leave for ordinary disability. 1. When in the judgment of an appointing authority an employee is unable to perform the duties of such employee's position by reason of a disability, other than a disability resulting from occupational injury or disease as defined in the workers' compensation law, the appointing authority may require such employee to undergo a medical examination to be conducted by a medical officer selected by the civil service department or municipal commission having jurisdiction. Written notice of the facts providing the basis for the judgment of the appointing authority that the employee is not fit to perform the duties of such employee's position, and copies of any written, electronic or other communication by the appointing authority to a medical officer or any other entity regarding the claim that such employee is unable to perform their duties pursuant to this section, shall be provided to the employee, the authorized representative of such employee and the civil service department or commission having jurisdiction prior to the conduct of the medical examination. If, upon such medical examination, such medical officer shall certify that such employee is not physically or mentally fit to perform the duties of such employee's position, the appointing authority shall notify such employee that they may be placed on leave of absence. An employee placed on leave of absence pursuant to this section shall be given a written statement of the reasons therefor and complete copies of all of the documentation, reports and records relied upon by the medical officer during their examination, including any documents, reports and correspondence sent to the appointing authority at the conclusion of the examination. Such notice shall contain the reason for the proposed leave and the proposed date on which such leave is to commence, shall be made in writing and served in person or by first class, registered or certified mail, return receipt requested, upon the employee. Such notice shall also inform the employee of their rights under this procedure. An employee shall be allowed ten working days from service of the notice to object to the imposition of the proposed leave of absence and to request a hearing. The request for such hearing shall be filed by the employee personally or by first class, certified or registered mail, return receipt requested. Upon receipt of such request, the appointing authority shall supply to the employee, such employee's personal physician or authorized representative, copies of all diagnoses, test results, observations and other data supporting the certification, and imposition of the proposed leave of absence shall be held in abeyance until a final determination is made by the appointing authority as provided in this section. The appointing authority will afford the employee a hearing within thirty days of the date of a request by the employee to be held by an independent hearing officer agreed to by the appointing authority and the employee except that where the employer is a city of over one million in population such hearing may be held by a hearing officer employed by the office of administrative trials and hearings. If the parties are unable to agree upon a hearing officer, such hearing officer shall be selected by lot from a list of persons maintained by the state department of civil service. The hearing officer shall not be an employee of the same appointing authority as the employee alleged to be disabled. The hearing officer shall be vested with all of the powers of the appointing authority, and shall make a record of the hearing which shall, with such hearing officer's recommendation, be referred to the appointing authority for review and decision and which shall be provided to the affected employee free of charge. A copy of the transcript of the hearing shall, upon request of the employee affected, be transmitted to such employee without charge. The employee may be represented at any hearing by counsel or a representative of a certified or recognized employee organization and may present medical experts and other witnesses or evidence. The employee shall be entitled to a reasonable period of time to obtain such representation. The burden of proving mental or physical unfitness shall be upon the person alleging it. Compliance with technical rules of evidence shall not be required. The appointing authority will render a final determination within ten working days of the date of receipt of the hearing officer's report and recommendation. The appointing authority may either uphold the original proposed notice of leave of absence, withdraw such notice or modify the notice as appropriate. In any event, a final determination of an employee's contest of a notice of leave shall be rendered within seventy-five days of the receipt of the request for review. An employee on such leave of absence shall be entitled to draw all accumulated, unused sick leave, vacation, overtime and other time allowances standing to such employee's credit. The appointing authority in the final determination shall notify the employee of such employee's right to appeal from such determination to the civil service commission having jurisdiction in accordance with subdivision three of this section. 2. An employee placed on leave pursuant to subdivision one of this section may, within one year after the date of commencement of such leave of absence, or thereafter at any time until his or her employment status is terminated, make application to the civil service department or municipal commission having jurisdiction over the position from which such employee is on leave, for a medical examination by a medical officer selected for that purpose by such department or commission. If, upon such medical examination, such medical officer shall certify that such employee is physically and mentally fit to perform the duties of his or her position, he or she shall be reinstated to his or her position. 3. An employee who is certified as not physically or mentally fit to perform the duties of his or her position and who is placed on leave of absence pursuant to subdivision one of this section, or who is denied reinstatement after examination pursuant to subdivision two of this section, may appeal from such determination to the state or municipal civil service commission having jurisdiction over his or her position. Such employee and appointing officer or their representatives shall be afforded an opportunity to present facts and arguments in support of their positions including medical evidence at a time and place and in such manner as may be prescribed by the commission. Provided however, that in considering appeals pursuant to subdivision two of this section where a hearing has not been held within nine months from the date of notification pursuant to subdivision one of this section, the commission shall designate an independent hearing officer who shall hold a hearing and report thereon. The commission shall make its determination on the basis of the medical records and such facts and arguments as are presented to it. The final determination of the commission shall be binding on both the employee and the appointing authority; provided, however, that an employee or appointing authority may seek review of a final determination of a commission in accordance with the provisions of article seventy-eight of the civil practice law and rules. 4. If an employee placed on leave pursuant to this section is not reinstated within one year after the date of commencement of such leave, his or her employment status may be terminated in accordance with the provisions of section seventy-three of this article. 5. Notwithstanding any other provisions of this section, if the appointing authority determines that there is probable cause to believe that the continued presence of the employee on the job represents a potential danger to persons or property or would severely interfere with operations, it may place such employee on involuntary leave of absence immediately; provided, however, that the employee shall be entitled to draw all accumulated unused sick leave, vacation, overtime and other time allowances standing to his or her credit. If such an employee is finally determined not to be physically or mentally unfit to perform the duties of his or her position, he or she shall be restored to his or her position and shall have any leave credits or salary that he or she may have lost because of such involuntary leave of absence restored to him or her less any compensation he or she may have earned in other employment or occupation and any unemployment benefits he or she may have received during such period.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 74
cases (5 in the last 5 years), 1980–2025 · leading case: Smith v. New York State Dep't of Labor, 191 Misc. 2d 195 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 2002).
Smith v. New York State Dep't of Labor, 191 Misc. 2d 195 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 2002). “Petitioner seeks a declaration that respondents violated Civil Service Law § 72 by failing to hold a Civil Service Law § 72 (1) hearing, failing to provide petitioner with “written notice and explanations” and providing allegedly “inaccurate and misleading writings” to…”
Sheeran v. New York State Dep't of Transp., 68 A.D.3d 1199 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009). “In November 2007, petitioner’s union, the Public Employees Federation, requested a hearing on behalf of petitioner pursuant to Civil Service Law § 72. 1 Respondents denied the request.”
Sheeran v. Dep't of Transp., 958 N.E.2d 1197 (NY 2011). “The issue presented on both of these appeals is whether Civil Service Law § 72, which provides certain procedural safeguards to a public employee when placed on an involuntary leave of absence, applies to employees who are prevented from returning to work following a voluntary…”
McShane v. State, 43 Misc. 3d 320 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 2014). “This combined CPLR article 78 and article 75 proceeding concerns acts ostensibly taken under Civil Service Law § 72 for placement of petitioner, a tenured civil service worker, on involuntary leave for medical disability and a parallel grievance procedure under the collective…”
Breen v. Gunn, 137 A.D.2d 685 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988). “In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the New York City Transit Authority dated November 1, 1985, which placed the petitioner on an involuntary leave of absence pursuant to Civil Service Law § 72, David Gunn, President of the New York City…”
Rafael Santiago v. New York State Dep't of Corr. Servs. & Dr. Melvin J. Steinhart, New York State Dep't Corr. Servs., 945 F.2d 25 (2d Cir. 1991). “Santiago protested this action to DOCS, requesting a hearing pursuant to N.Y. Civil Service Law § 72 (1) to contest the determination.”
Mitchell v. Essex Cnty. Sheriff's Dep't, 302 A.D.2d 732 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003). “On May 22, 2001, petitioner filed a claim for workers’ compensation benefits and, on May 23, 2001, petitioner’s union filed a grievance on his behalf under the applicable collective bargaining agreement, claiming that on February 20, 2001, respondents had denied him of his…”
Honey v. Cnty. of Rockland, 200 F. Supp. 2d 311 (S.D.N.Y. 2002). “tiff suffered from a disability as defined by the ADA, that her request for an exemption from working her regular shift rotations was denied, and that because her physician has said that she suffered from symptoms which made it potentially dangerous for plaintiff to do her job,…”
Gaines v. New York State Div. for Youth, 213 A.D.2d 894 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995). “* *896 Petitioner commenced this combined proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 and action for declaratory judgment seeking, inter alia, a declaration that respondents denied petitioner employment without due process, equal protection of the law and in violation of Civil…”
Petix v. New York State Off. of Mental Health, 291 A.D.2d 846 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002). “Memorandum: Petitioner, a senior physical therapist for respondent Rochester Psychiatric Center (RPC), was placed on an immediate involuntary leave of absence on October 13, 1999, pursuant to Civil Service Law § 72 (5). Petitioner objected to the involuntary leave of absence and…”
Briggs v. Scoralick, 147 A.D.2d 694 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989). “The respondent now alleges that the purpose of terminating the petitioner’s suspension was to place him on an extended leave of absence pursuant to Civil Service Law § 72. While there is some evidence in the record that this was in fact the purpose the respondent had in mind,…”
Matter of Hunstein v. Town of Southold, 2022 NY Slip Op 02413 (N.Y. App. Div. 2022). “While a disciplinary proceeding pursuant to section 75 is not an appropriate proceeding for determining the physical or mental "unfitness" of an employee within the meaning of Civil Service Law § 72(1) ( see Matter of Cymbalsky v Dilworth , 97 AD2d 543, 543 ; see also Civil…”
— N.Y. Civil Service Law § 72(1) — 3 cases
Laurido v. Simon, 489 F. Supp. 1169 (S.D.N.Y. 1980).
Matter of Hunstein v. Town of Southold, 2022 NY Slip Op 02413 (N.Y. App. Div. 2022). “While a disciplinary proceeding pursuant to section 75 is not an appropriate proceeding for determining the physical or mental "unfitness" of an employee within the meaning of Civil Service Law § 72(1) ( see Matter of Cymbalsky v Dilworth , 97 AD2d 543, 543 ; see also Civil…”
Matter of Phillips v. New York Citywide Admin. Servs., 2019 NY Slip Op 4658 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019).
— N.Y. Civil Service Law § 72(3) — 1 case
Santiago v. New York State Dep't of Corr. Servs., 725 F. Supp. 780 (S.D.N.Y. 1989).
— N.Y. Civil Service Law § 72(5) — 2 cases
Matter of Phillips v. New York Citywide Admin. Servs., 2019 NY Slip Op 4658 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.