New York Consolidated Laws
N.Y. Domestic Relations Law § 170 (2026)
Action for divorce
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
NY-LEGnysenate.gov
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
§ 170. Action for divorce. An action for divorce may be maintained by a husband or wife to procure a judgment divorcing the parties and dissolving the marriage on any of the following grounds: (1) The cruel and inhuman treatment of the plaintiff by the defendant such that the conduct of the defendant so endangers the physical or mental well being of the plaintiff as renders it unsafe or improper for the plaintiff to cohabit with the defendant. (2) The abandonment of the plaintiff by the defendant for a period of one or more years. (3) The confinement of the defendant in prison for a period of three or more consecutive years after the marriage of plaintiff and defendant. (4) The commission of an act of adultery, provided that adultery for the purposes of articles ten, eleven, and eleven-A of this chapter, is hereby defined as the commission of an act of vaginal sexual contact, oral sexual contact or anal sexual contact, voluntarily performed by the defendant, with a person other than the plaintiff after the marriage of plaintiff and defendant. Oral sexual contact and anal sexual contact include, but are not limited to, sexual conduct as defined in subdivision two of section 130.00 and subdivision four of section 130.20 of the penal law. (5) The spouses have lived apart pursuant to a decree or judgment of separation for a period of six months or more after the granting of such decree or judgment, and satisfactory proof has been submitted by the plaintiff that such plaintiff has substantially performed all the terms and conditions of such decree or judgment. (6) The spouses have lived separate and apart pursuant to a written agreement of separation, subscribed by the parties thereto and acknowledged or proved in the form required to entitle a deed to be recorded, for a period of six months or more after the execution of such agreement and satisfactory proof has been submitted by the plaintiff that such plaintiff has substantially performed all the terms and conditions of such agreement. Such agreement shall be filed in the office of the clerk of the county wherein either party resides. In lieu of filing such agreement, either party to such agreement may file a memorandum of such agreement, which memorandum shall be similarly subscribed and acknowledged or proved as was the agreement of separation and shall contain the following information: (a) the names and addresses of each of the parties, (b) the date of marriage of the parties, (c) the date of the agreement of separation and (d) the date of this subscription and acknowledgment or proof of such agreement of separation. (7) The relationship between husband and wife has broken down irretrievably for a period of at least six months, provided that one party has so stated under oath. No judgment of divorce shall be granted under this subdivision unless and until the economic issues of equitable distribution of marital property, the payment or waiver of spousal support, the payment of child support, the payment of counsel and experts' fees and expenses as well as the custody and visitation with the infant children of the marriage have been resolved by the parties, or determined by the court and incorporated into the judgment of divorce.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 419
cases (16 in the last 5 years), 1974–2025 · leading case: Rinzler v. Rinzler, 97 A.D.3d 215 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012).
Rinzler v. Rinzler, 97 A.D.3d 215 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012). “In June 2009, plaintiff commenced an action for divorce on the grounds of cruel and inhuman treatment and abandonment (see Domestic Relations Law § 170 [1], [2]). Defendant answered and counterclaimed for spousal support arrears.”
Strack v. Strack, 31 Misc. 3d 258 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 2011). “The parties were married on May 25, 1963 and plaintiff now seeks a divorce based upon the newly enacted no-fault grounds contained within Domestic Relations Law § 170 (7). 1 In lieu of an answer, defendant now moves to dismiss the complaint, contending (1) that the complaint…”
Schiffer v. Schiffer, 33 Misc. 3d 795 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 2011). “” 1 “dr michael hfuhruhurr: Dolores, I’m making a citizen’s divorce! “dolores: (laughing) What? “dr michael hfuhruhurr: By the powers vested in me, I hereby declare our marriage null and void! E Pluribus Unum!” 2 This case presents an issue with respect to the recently enacted…”
Covington v. Walker, 819 N.E.2d 1025 (NY 2004). “The issue presented by this appeal is whether plaintiffs cause of action for divorce on the ground of imprisonment pursuant to Domestic Relations Law § 170 (3), brought 16 years after the commencement of defendant’s confinement, is barred by the five-year statute of limitations…”
A.C. v. D.R., 32 Misc. 3d 293 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 2011). “2 moves by order to show cause for an order (1) pursuant to CPLR 3212, granting her partial *295 summary judgment on her cause of action for a divorce on the ground that the relationship between the parties has been irretrievably broken for a period of at least six months…”
Filstein v. Bromberg, 36 Misc. 3d 404 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 2012). “The husband’s complaint sets forth three grounds for divorce: abandonment (Domestic Relations Law § 170 [2]); living separate and apart pursuant to separation agreement (Domestic Relations Law § 170 [6]); and irretrievable breakdown of the marriage (Domestic Relations Law § 170…”
Trbovich v. Trbovich, 122 A.D.3d 1381 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014). “1, Supreme Court denied plaintiff’s motion for, inter alia, summary judg *1382 ment seeking a divorce pursuant to Domestic Relations Law § 170 (7) and to vacate a prior ex parte order awarding temporary maintenance to defendant.”
Townes v. Coker, 35 Misc. 3d 543 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 2012). “2 is predicated upon the recently enacted “no-fault” ground for divorce established in Domestic Relations Law § 170 (7), to wit: the irretrievable breakdown of the relationship of the parties.”
Davis v. Davis, 71 A.D.3d 13 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009). “The issue on this appeal is whether the “social abandonment” of a spouse may qualify as “abandonment” and provide a ground for the dissolution of marriage under Domestic Relations Law § 170 (2). We conclude that it does not.”
Johnston v. Johnston, 2017 NY Slip Op 8923 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017). “With respect to the grounds for divorce, the husband’s sworn testimony that his marriage to the wife had irretrievably broken down for a period of at least six months was sufficient to establish, as a matter of law, his cause of action for divorce pursuant to Domestic Relations…”
Rose v. Rose, 167 Misc. 2d 562 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1995). “The issue presented is an interesting one and appears to be of first impression: Does a shareholder’s agreement entered into by the parties constitute sufficient evidence of a written agreement of separation to support a divorce under Domestic Relations Law § 170 (6)? The…”
Hurley v. Johnson, 4 Misc. 3d 616 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 2004). “” 1 By notice of motion dated November 20, 2003, plaintiff moved this court for a judgment of divorce pursuant to Domestic Relations Law § 170 (6). The motion was denied, in part because the agreement was not acknowledged in a form entitling a deed to be recorded.”
— N.Y. Domestic Relations Law § 170(1) — 2 cases
Ara v. Anjum (In Re Anjum), 288 B.R. 72 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2003).
Szablyar v. Gheorghe J. Zuralau, 2018 NY Slip Op 5884 (N.Y. App. Div. 2018).
— N.Y. Domestic Relations Law § 170(2) — 2 cases
Roseda J. v. Charles O., 2024 NY Slip Op 50988(U) (N.Y. Sup. Kings 2024).
Roseda J. v. Charles O., 2024 NY Slip Op 50988(U) (N.Y. Sup. Kings 2024).
— N.Y. Domestic Relations Law § 170(4) — 1 case
Agulnick v. Agulnick, 2020 NY Slip Op 07335 (N.Y. App. Div. 2020).
— N.Y. Domestic Relations Law § 170(6) — 2 cases
Matter of Jason (Sonia O.), 2018 NY Slip Op 1922 (N.Y. App. Div. 2018).
Osborn v. Osborn, 25 Pa. D. & C.3d 709 (1983).
— N.Y. Domestic Relations Law § 170(7) — 8 cases
Pierre v. Weir, 2025 NY Slip Op 02231 (N.Y. App. Div. 2025).
D'Ambra v. D'Ambra, 2024 NY Slip Op 01291 (N.Y. App. Div. 2024).
Michael Rodger Brown (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2020).
Szablyar v. Gheorghe J. Zuralau, 2018 NY Slip Op 5884 (N.Y. App. Div. 2018).
Patouhas v. Patouhas, 2019 NY Slip Op 3978 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.