New York Consolidated Laws

N.Y. Domestic Relations Law § 170 (2026)

Action for divorce

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NY-LEGnysenate.gov Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
§ 170. Action for divorce. An action for divorce may be maintained by
a husband or wife to procure a judgment divorcing the parties and
dissolving the marriage on any of the following grounds:
  (1) The cruel and inhuman treatment of the plaintiff by the defendant
such that the conduct of the defendant so endangers the physical or
mental well being of the plaintiff as renders it unsafe or improper for
the plaintiff to cohabit with the defendant.
  (2) The abandonment of the plaintiff by the defendant for a period of
one or more years.
  (3) The confinement of the defendant in prison for a period of three
or more consecutive years after the marriage of plaintiff and defendant.
  (4) The commission of an act of adultery, provided that adultery for
the purposes of articles ten, eleven, and eleven-A of this chapter, is
hereby defined as the commission of an act of vaginal sexual contact,
oral sexual contact or anal sexual contact, voluntarily performed by the
defendant, with a person other than the plaintiff after the marriage of
plaintiff and defendant. Oral sexual contact and anal sexual contact
include, but are not limited to, sexual conduct as defined in
subdivision two of section 130.00 and subdivision four of section 130.20
of the penal law.
  (5) The spouses have lived apart pursuant to a decree or judgment of
separation for a period of six months or more after the granting of such
decree or judgment, and satisfactory proof has been submitted by the
plaintiff that such plaintiff has substantially performed all the terms
and conditions of such decree or judgment.
  (6) The spouses have lived separate and apart pursuant to a written
agreement of separation, subscribed by the parties thereto and
acknowledged or proved in the form required to entitle a deed to be
recorded, for a period of six months or more after the execution of such
agreement and satisfactory proof has been submitted by the plaintiff
that such plaintiff has substantially performed all the terms and
conditions of such agreement. Such agreement shall be filed in the
office of the clerk of the county wherein either party resides. In lieu
of filing such agreement, either party to such agreement may file a
memorandum of such agreement, which memorandum shall be similarly
subscribed and acknowledged or proved as was the agreement of separation
and shall contain the following information: (a) the names and addresses
of each of the parties, (b) the date of marriage of the parties, (c) the
date of the agreement of separation and (d) the date of this
subscription and acknowledgment or proof of such agreement of
separation.
  (7) The relationship between husband and wife has broken down
irretrievably for a period of at least six months, provided that one
party has so stated under oath. No judgment of divorce shall be granted
under this subdivision unless and until the economic issues of equitable
distribution of marital property, the payment or waiver of spousal
support, the payment of child support, the payment of counsel and
experts' fees and expenses as well as the custody and visitation with
the infant children of the marriage have been resolved by the parties,
or determined by the court and incorporated into the judgment of
divorce.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 419 cases (16 in the last 5 years), 1974–2025 · leading case: Rinzler v. Rinzler, 97 A.D.3d 215 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012).
Rinzler v. Rinzler, 97 A.D.3d 215 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012). · cites it 9× “In June 2009, plaintiff commenced an action for divorce on the grounds of cruel and inhuman treatment and abandonment (see Domestic Relations Law § 170 [1], [2]). Defendant answered and counterclaimed for spousal support arrears.”
Strack v. Strack, 31 Misc. 3d 258 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 2011). · cites it 14× “The parties were married on May 25, 1963 and plaintiff now seeks a divorce based upon the newly enacted no-fault grounds contained within Domestic Relations Law § 170 (7). 1 In lieu of an answer, defendant now moves to dismiss the complaint, contending (1) that the complaint…”
Schiffer v. Schiffer, 33 Misc. 3d 795 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 2011). · cites it 14× “” 1 “dr michael hfuhruhurr: Dolores, I’m making a citizen’s divorce! “dolores: (laughing) What? “dr michael hfuhruhurr: By the powers vested in me, I hereby declare our marriage null and void! E Pluribus Unum!” 2 This case presents an issue with respect to the recently enacted…”
Covington v. Walker, 819 N.E.2d 1025 (NY 2004). · cites it 8× “The issue presented by this appeal is whether plaintiffs cause of action for divorce on the ground of imprisonment pursuant to Domestic Relations Law § 170 (3), brought 16 years after the commencement of defendant’s confinement, is barred by the five-year statute of limitations…”
A.C. v. D.R., 32 Misc. 3d 293 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 2011). · cites it 8× “2 moves by order to show cause for an order (1) pursuant to CPLR 3212, granting her partial *295 summary judgment on her cause of action for a divorce on the ground that the relationship between the parties has been irretrievably broken for a period of at least six months…”
Filstein v. Bromberg, 36 Misc. 3d 404 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 2012). · cites it 11× “The husband’s complaint sets forth three grounds for divorce: abandonment (Domestic Relations Law § 170 [2]); living separate and apart pursuant to separation agreement (Domestic Relations Law § 170 [6]); and irretrievable breakdown of the marriage (Domestic Relations Law § 170…”
Trbovich v. Trbovich, 122 A.D.3d 1381 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014). · cites it 6× “1, Supreme Court denied plaintiff’s motion for, inter alia, summary judg *1382 ment seeking a divorce pursuant to Domestic Relations Law § 170 (7) and to vacate a prior ex parte order awarding temporary maintenance to defendant.”
Townes v. Coker, 35 Misc. 3d 543 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 2012). · cites it 7× “2 is predicated upon the recently enacted “no-fault” ground for divorce established in Domestic Relations Law § 170 (7), to wit: the irretrievable breakdown of the relationship of the parties.”
Davis v. Davis, 71 A.D.3d 13 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009). · cites it 9× “The issue on this appeal is whether the “social abandonment” of a spouse may qualify as “abandonment” and provide a ground for the dissolution of marriage under Domestic Relations Law § 170 (2). We conclude that it does not.”
Johnston v. Johnston, 2017 NY Slip Op 8923 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017). · cites it 3× “With respect to the grounds for divorce, the husband’s sworn testimony that his marriage to the wife had irretrievably broken down for a period of at least six months was sufficient to establish, as a matter of law, his cause of action for divorce pursuant to Domestic Relations…”
Rose v. Rose, 167 Misc. 2d 562 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1995). · cites it 15× “The issue presented is an interesting one and appears to be of first impression: Does a shareholder’s agreement entered into by the parties constitute sufficient evidence of a written agreement of separation to support a divorce under Domestic Relations Law § 170 (6)? The…”
Hurley v. Johnson, 4 Misc. 3d 616 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 2004). · cites it 9× “” 1 By notice of motion dated November 20, 2003, plaintiff moved this court for a judgment of divorce pursuant to Domestic Relations Law § 170 (6). The motion was denied, in part because the agreement was not acknowledged in a form entitling a deed to be recorded.”
— N.Y. Domestic Relations Law § 170(1) — 2 cases
Ara v. Anjum (In Re Anjum), 288 B.R. 72 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2003).
Szablyar v. Gheorghe J. Zuralau, 2018 NY Slip Op 5884 (N.Y. App. Div. 2018).
— N.Y. Domestic Relations Law § 170(2) — 2 cases
Roseda J. v. Charles O., 2024 NY Slip Op 50988(U) (N.Y. Sup. Kings 2024).
Roseda J. v. Charles O., 2024 NY Slip Op 50988(U) (N.Y. Sup. Kings 2024).
— N.Y. Domestic Relations Law § 170(4) — 1 case
Agulnick v. Agulnick, 2020 NY Slip Op 07335 (N.Y. App. Div. 2020).
— N.Y. Domestic Relations Law § 170(6) — 2 cases
Matter of Jason (Sonia O.), 2018 NY Slip Op 1922 (N.Y. App. Div. 2018).
Osborn v. Osborn, 25 Pa. D. & C.3d 709 (1983).
— N.Y. Domestic Relations Law § 170(7) — 8 cases
Pierre v. Weir, 2025 NY Slip Op 02231 (N.Y. App. Div. 2025).
D'Ambra v. D'Ambra, 2024 NY Slip Op 01291 (N.Y. App. Div. 2024).
Michael Rodger Brown (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2020).
Szablyar v. Gheorghe J. Zuralau, 2018 NY Slip Op 5884 (N.Y. App. Div. 2018).
Patouhas v. Patouhas, 2019 NY Slip Op 3978 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.