New York Consolidated Laws
N.Y. Executive Law § 801 (2026)
Statement of legislative findings and purposes
✓ text as retrieved May 2026 (this copy records no edition or section history)
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
NY-LEGnysenate.gov
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
§ 801. Statement of legislative findings and purposes. The Adirondack park is abundant in natural resources and open space unique to New York and the eastern United States. The wild forest, water, wildlife and aesthetic resources of the park, and its open space character, provide an outdoor recreational experience of national and international significance. Growing population, advancing technology and an expanding economy are focusing ever-increasing pressures on these priceless resources. Our forefathers saw fit nearly a century ago to provide rigid constitutional safeguards for the public lands in the Adirondack park. Today forest preserve lands constitute approximately forty percent of the six million acres of land in the park. The people of the state of New York have consistently reiterated their support for this time-honored institution. Continuing public concern, coupled with the vast acreages of forest preserve holdings, clearly establishes a substantial state interest in the preservation and development of the park area. The state of New York has an obligation to insure that contemporary and projected future pressures on the park resources are provided for within a land use control framework which recognizes not only matters of local concern but also those of regional and state concern. In the past the Adirondack environment has been enhanced by the intermingling of public and private land. A unique pattern of private land use has developed which has not only complemented the forest preserve holdings but also has provided an outlet for development of supporting facilities necessary to the proper use and enjoyment of the unique wild forest atmosphere of the park. This fruitful relationship is now jeopardized by the threat of unregulated development on such private lands. Local governments in the Adirondack park find it increasingly difficult to cope with the unrelenting pressures for development being brought to bear on the area, and to exercise their discretionary powers to create an effective land use and development control framework. The basic purpose of this article is to insure optimum overall conservation, protection, preservation, development and use of the unique scenic, aesthetic, wildlife, recreational, open space, historic, ecological and natural resources of the Adirondack park. A further purpose of this article is to focus the responsibility for developing long-range park policy in a forum reflecting statewide concern. This policy shall recognize the major state interest in the conservation, use and development of the park's resources and the preservation of its open space character, and at the same time, provide a continuing role for local government. The Adirondack park land use and development plan set forth in this article recognizes the complementary needs of all the people of the state for the preservation of the park's resources and open space character and of the park's permanent, seasonal and transient populations for growth and service areas, employment, and a strong economic base, as well. In support of the essential interdependence of these needs, the plan represents a sensibly balanced apportionment of land to each. Adoption of the land use and development plan and authorization for its administration and enforcement will complement and assist in the administration of the Adirondack park master plan for management of state land. Together, they are essential to the achievement of the policies and purposes of this article and will benefit all of the people of the state. Accordingly, it is the further purpose of this article to adopt and implement the land use and development plan and to provide for the plan's maintenance, administration and enforcement in a continuing planning process that recognizes matters of local concern and those of regional and state concern, provides appropriate regulatory responsibilities for the agency and the local governments of the park and seeks to achieve sound local land use planning throughout the park.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 16
cases (4 in the last 5 years), 1989–2024 · leading case: Matter of Hunt Bros., Inc. v. Glennon, 613 N.E.2d 549 (N.Y. 1993).
Matter of Hunt Bros., Inc. v. Glennon, 613 N.E.2d 549 (N.Y. 1993). “The statute creating and empowering the APA is aimed at establishing a superagency to regulate development in the Adirondack Park region, which the Legislature has singled out for special protection because of its unique environmental significance ( see , Executive Law § 801).…”
Gerdts v. State, 210 A.D.2d 645 (N.Y. App. Div. 3d Dep't 1994). “Considering the Legislature’s comprehensive statement of findings and purposes contained in Executive Law § 801 and the delegation of power to the APA "to do any and all things necessary or convenient to carry out the purposes and policies of this article” (Executive Law § 804…”
McCulley v. N.Y.S. Dep't of Env't Conservation, 593 F. Supp. 2d 422 (N.D.N.Y. 2006). “N.Y. Exec. Law §§ 801 , 803 (McKinney 2005).”
Adirondack Park Agency v. Hunt Bros. Contractors, 234 A.D.2d 737 (N.Y. App. Div. 3d Dep't 1996). “We further disagree with Supreme Court’s determination that the equities were "evenly divided” when plaintiff’s express legislative purpose is to "benefit all of the people of the state” (Executive Law § 801). "[Plaintiff] is charged with an awesome responsibility and the…”
Cooper v. Wertime, 164 A.D.2d 221 (N.Y. App. Div. 1st Dep't 1990). “At one point following its creation, the Review Board apparently considered it necessary to hire an Executive Director and part-time secretary. The Review Board also incurred expenses for the operation of a permanent office.”
Lewis Fam. Farm, Inc. v. Adirondack Park Agency, 22 Misc. 3d 568 (N.Y. App. Term. 2008). “*575 IV The Adirondack Park Agency Act The APA Act establishes a comprehensive scheme for land use and development of all lands, but particularly those privately owned, lying within the six million acre Adirondack Park (Executive Law §§ 801, 802 [1]). All lands within the…”
Matter of Lake George Assn. v. NYS Adirondack Park Agency, 228 A.D.3d 52 (N.Y. App. Div. 3d Dep't 2024). “Respondent Adirondack Park Agency (hereinafter the APA) is deputized with advancing "optimum overall conservation, protection, preservation, development and use of the unique scenic, aesthetic, wildlife, recreational, open space, historic, ecological and natural resources of the…”
Protect the Adirondacks! Inc. v. New York State Dept. of Envtl. Conservation, 2019 NY Slip Op 5363 (N.Y. App. Div. 3d Dep't 2019). “Defendant Adirondack Park Agency is responsible for the development and implementation of long-range planning on both public and private lands in the Adirondack Park ( see generally Executive Law § 801). Defendant Department of Environmental Conservation (hereinafter DEC) has…”
Matter of Jorling v. Adirondack Park Agency, 214 A.D.3d 98 (N.Y. App. Div. 3d Dep't 2023). “v Common Council of City of Albany , 13 NY3d 297, 305 [2009]), and these allegations fall within the zone of interests sought to be protected by the Adirondack Park Agency Act ( see Executive Law § 801; compare Matter of Saratoga Lake Protection & Improvement Dist.”
Hunt Bros. v. Glennon, 180 A.D.2d 157 (N.Y. App. Div. 3d Dep't 1992). “Given the basic purpose of the APA Act expressed explicitly by the Legislature to “insure optimum overall conservation, protection, preservation, development and use of the unique scenic, aesthetic, wildlife, recreational, open space, historic, ecological and natural resources…”
Protect the Adirondacks! Inc. v. New York State Dept. of Envtl. Conservation, 2019 NY Slip Op 5363 (N.Y. App. Div. 3d Dep't 2019). “Defendant Adirondack Park Agency is responsible for the development and implementation of long-range planning on both public and private lands in the Adirondack Park ( see generally Executive Law § 801). Defendant Department of Environmental Conservation (hereinafter DEC) has…”
Matter of Jorling v. Adirondack Park Agency, 214 A.D.3d 98 (N.Y. App. Div. 3d Dep't 2023). “v Common Council of City of Albany , 13 NY3d 297, 305 [2009]), and these allegations fall within the zone of interests sought to be protected by the Adirondack Park Agency Act ( see Executive Law § 801; compare Matter of Saratoga Lake Protection & Improvement Dist.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.