New York Consolidated Laws
N.Y. Executive Law § 910 (2026)
Legislative findings
✓ text as retrieved May 2026 (this copy records no edition or section history)
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
NY-LEGnysenate.gov
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
§ 910. Legislative findings. The legislature hereby finds that New York state's coastal area and inland waterways are unique with a variety of natural, recreational, industrial, commercial, ecological, cultural, aesthetic and energy resources of statewide and national significance. The resources of the state's coastal areas and inland waterways are increasingly subject to the pressures of population growth and economic development, which include requirements for industry, commerce, residential development, recreation and for the production of energy. These competing demands result in the loss of living marine resources and wildlife, the diminution of open space areas, shoreline erosion, permanent, adverse changes to ecological systems and a loss of economic opportunities. The social and economic well-being and the general welfare of the people of the state are critically dependent upon the preservation, enhancement, protection, development and use of the natural and man-made resources of the state's coastal area and inland waterways. The legislature further finds that it is in the interest of the people of the state that coordinated and comprehensive policy and planning for preservation, enhancement, protection, development and use of the state's coastal and inland waterway resources take place to insure the proper balance between natural resources and the need to accommodate the needs of population growth and economic development.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3
cases, 1989–2015 · leading case: Defend H20 v. Town Bd. of East Hampton, 147 F. Supp. 3d 80 (E.D.N.Y. 2015).
Defend H20 v. Town Bd. of East Hampton, 147 F. Supp. 3d 80 (E.D.N.Y. 2015). “The New York State Coastal and Waterways Act In 1981, the New York State Legislature enacted the Waterfront' Revitalization- of Coastal Areas and Inland Waterways Act, N.Y. Exec. Law § 910 , et seq. (the “NYS Coastal and Waterways Act”), which authorized the New York Department…”
Vaizburd v. United States, 90 F. Supp. 2d 210 (E.D.N.Y. 2000). “; and the Waterfront Revitalization and Coastal Management Program, N.Y.Exec.Law § 910 et seq. Whether a private party can recover damages from a municipality for violation of or failure to enforce the provisions of these statutes appears to be a novel state law issue; as such,…”
City of New Rochelle v. Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 150 A.D.2d 441 (N.Y. App. Div. 2d Dep't 1989). “There is also substantial evidence in the record that the selection of the Davenport Neck transition station site does not contravene the policies embodied in the Waterfront Revitalization and Coastal Resources Act (see, Executive Law § 910 et seq.). The transition station is…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.