New York Consolidated Laws
N.Y. Insurance Law § 5906 (2026)
Security funds and compulsory associations
✓ text as retrieved May 2026 (this copy records no edition or section history)
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
NY-LEGnysenate.gov
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
§ 5906. Security funds and compulsory associations. (a) No risk retention group shall be required or permitted to join or contribute financially to any insurance insolvency security fund, or similar mechanism, in this state, nor shall any risk retention group, or its insureds or claimants against its insureds receive any benefit from any such fund for claims arising under the insurance policies issued by such risk retention group. (b) When a purchasing group obtains insurance covering its members' risks from an insurer not authorized in this state or a risk retention group, no such risks wherever resident or located shall be covered by any insurance insolvency security fund or similar mechanism in this state. (c) The superintendent may require risk retention groups not chartered in this state to participate, and may exempt domestic risk retention groups from participation, in any mechanism established or authorized under the law of this state for the equitable apportionment among insurers of liability insurance risks or of liability insurance losses and expenses incurred on policies written through such mechanism, and such risk retention groups shall submit sufficient information to the superintendent to enable the superintendent to apportion on a non-discriminatory basis the risk retention group's proportionate share of such risks or of such losses and expenses.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3
cases, 2019–2019 · leading case: Givens v. Kingsbridge Hgts. Care Ctr., Inc., 171 A.D.3d 569 (N.Y. App. Div. 1st Dep't 2019).
Givens v. Kingsbridge Hgts. Care Ctr., Inc., 171 A.D.3d 569 (N.Y. App. Div. 1st Dep't 2019). “Risk retention groups, unlike traditional insurance companies, are not required to contribute to a guaranty fund which would be available in the event of their insolvency ( see 15 USC §§ 3901-3906 ; Insurance Law § 5906 [exempts risk management companies from the requirement of…”
Caimares v. Erickson, 173 A.D.3d 417 (N.Y. App. Div. 1st Dep't 2019). “Plaintiff's position to the contrary is particularly persuasive, given the unavailability of indemnity funds to compensate her for harms attributable to defendant Erickson ( see Insurance Law § 5906). To the extent defendants herald the creation of RRGs by federal law as a…”
Hala v. Orange Reg'l Med. Ctr., 178 A.D.3d 151 (N.Y. App. Div. 2d Dep't 2019). “Notably, Insurance Law § 5906 precludes risk retention groups from participating in medical malpractice insurance in New York.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.