N.Y. Laws » CHAPTER Labor / ARTICLE Payment of Wages
New York Consolidated Laws

N.Y. Labor Law § 192 (2026)

Cash payment of wages

✓ text as retrieved May 2026 (this copy records no edition or section history)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NY-LEGnysenate.gov Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar 
§ 192. Cash payment of wages. 1. No employer shall without the advance
written consent of any employee directly pay or deposit the net wage or
salary of such employee in a bank or other financial institution.
  2. This section shall not apply to any person employed in a bona fide
executive, administrative, or professional capacity whose earnings are
in excess of one thousand three hundred dollars a week, nor to employees
working on a farm not connected with a factory.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 2014–2020 · leading case: Matter of Reardon v. Global Cash Card, Inc., 179 A.D.3d 1228 (N.Y. App. Div. 3d Dep't 2020).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Matter of Reardon v. Global Cash Card, Inc., 179 A.D.3d 1228 (N.Y. App. Div. 3d Dep't 2020). “, 25 NY3d 600, 611 [2015]), ensuring that an employer can only use payroll debit cards for the payment of wages when the employee consents to the deposit of wages in the account linked to the card ( see Labor Law § 192 [1]; 12 NYCRR 192-1.2 [a]; 192-1.”
In re the Claim of Markaj, 119 A.D.3d 1267 (N.Y. App. Div. 3d Dep't 2014). “We have considered her remaining claims, including that the employer’s payroll policy violates Labor Law § 192, and find them to be unavailing.”
MatterofMarkaj[Commr.ofLabor], No. 518294 (N.Y. App. Div. 3d Dep't July 24, 2014). “We have considered her remaining claims, including that the employer's payroll policy violates Labor Law § 192, and find them to be unavailing.”
In re the Claim of Markaj, 119 A.D.3d 1267 (N.Y. App. Div. 3d Dep't 2014). “We have considered her remaining claims, including that the employer’s payroll policy violates Labor Law § 192, and find them to be unavailing.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.