New York Consolidated Laws

N.Y. Labor Law § 193 (2026)

Deductions from wages

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NY-LEGnysenate.gov Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
§ 193. Deductions from wages.  * 1. No employer shall make any
deduction from the wages of an employee, except deductions which:
  a. are made in accordance with the provisions of any law or any rule
or regulation issued by any governmental agency including regulations
promulgated under paragraph c and paragraph d of this subdivision; or
  b. are expressly authorized in writing by the employee and are for the
benefit of the employee, provided that such authorization is voluntary
and only given following receipt by the employee of written notice of
all terms and conditions of the payment and/or its benefits and the
details of the manner in which deductions will be made. Whenever there
is a substantial change in the terms or conditions of the payment,
including but not limited to, any change in the amount of the deduction,
or a substantial change in the benefits of the deduction or the details
in the manner in which deductions shall be made, the employer shall, as
soon as practicable, but in each case before any increased deduction is
made on the employee's behalf, notify the employee prior to the
implementation of the change. Such authorization shall be kept on file
on the employer's premises for the period during which the employee is
employed by the employer and for six years after such employment ends.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, employee authorization for deductions
under this section may also be provided to the employer pursuant to the
terms of a collective bargaining agreement. Such authorized deductions
shall be limited to payments for:
  (i) insurance premiums and prepaid legal plans;
  (ii) pension or health and welfare benefits;
  (iii) contributions to a bona fide charitable organization;
  (iv) purchases made at events sponsored by a bona fide charitable
organization affiliated with the employer where at least twenty percent
of the profits from such event are being contributed to a bona fide
charitable organization;
  (v) United States bonds;
  (vi) dues or assessments to a labor organization;
  (vii) discounted parking or discounted passes, tokens, fare cards,
vouchers, or other items that entitle the employee to use mass transit;
  (viii) fitness center, health club, and/or gym membership dues;
  (ix) cafeteria and vending machine purchases made at the employer's
place of business and purchases made at gift shops operated by the
employer, where the employer is a hospital, college, or university;
  (x) pharmacy purchases made at the employer's place of business;
  (xi) tuition, room, board, and fees for pre-school, nursery, primary,
secondary, and/or post-secondary educational institutions;
  (xii) day care, before-school and after-school care expenses;
  (xiii) payments for housing provided at no more than market rates by
non-profit hospitals or affiliates thereof; and
  (xiv) similar payments for the benefit of the employee.
  c. are related to recovery of an overpayment of wages where such
overpayment is due to a mathematical or other clerical error by the
employer. In making such recoveries, the employer shall comply with
regulations promulgated by the commissioner for this purpose, which
regulations shall include, but not be limited to, provisions governing:
the size of overpayments that may be covered by this section; the
timing, frequency, duration, and method of such recovery; limitations on
the periodic amount of such recovery; a requirement that notice be
provided to the employee prior to the commencement of such recovery; a
requirement that the employer implement a procedure for disputing the
amount of such overpayment or seeking to delay commencement of such
recovery; the terms and content of such a procedure and a requirement
that notice of the procedure for disputing the overpayment or seeking to
delay commencement of such recovery be provided to the employee prior to
the commencement of such recovery.
  d. repayment of advances of salary or wages made by the employer to
the employee. Deductions to cover such repayments shall be made in
accordance with regulations promulgated by the commissioner for this
purpose, which regulations shall include, but not be limited to,
provisions governing: the timing, frequency, duration, and method of
such repayment; limitations on the periodic amount of such repayment; a
requirement that notice be provided to the employee prior to the
commencement of such repayment; a requirement that the employer
implement a procedure for disputing the amount of such repayment or
seeking to delay commencement of such repayment; the terms and content
of such a procedure and a requirement that notice of the procedure for
disputing the repayment or seeking to delay commencement of such
repayment be provided to the employee at the time the loan is made.
  * NB Effective until November 6, 2026
  * 1. No employer shall make any deduction from the wages of an
employee, except deductions which:
  a. are made in accordance with the provisions of any law or any rule
or regulation issued by any governmental agency; or
  b. are expressly authorized in writing by the employee and are for the
benefit of the employee; provided that such authorization is kept on
file on the employer's premises. Such authorized deductions shall be
limited to payments for insurance premiums, pension or health and
welfare benefits, contributions to charitable organizations, payments
for United States bonds, payments for dues or assessments to a labor
organization, and similar payments for the benefit of the employee.
  * NB Effective November 6, 2026
  * 2. Deductions made in conjunction with an employer sponsored pre-tax
contribution plan approved by the IRS or other local taxing authority,
including those falling within one or more of the categories set forth
in paragraph b of subdivision one of this section, shall be considered
to have been made in accordance with paragraph a of subdivision one of
this section.
  * NB Effective until November 6, 2026
  * 2. No employer shall make any charge against wages, or require an
employee to make any payment by separate transaction unless such charge
or payment is permitted as a deduction from wages under the provisions
of subdivision one of this section.
  * NB Effective November 6, 2026
  * 3. a. No employer shall make any charge against wages, or require an
employee to make any payment by separate transaction unless such charge
or payment is permitted as a deduction from wages under the provisions
of subdivision one of this section or is permitted or required under any
provision of a current collective bargaining agreement.
  b. Notwithstanding the existence of employee authorization to make
deductions in accordance with subparagraphs (iv), (ix), and (x) of
paragraph b of subdivision one of this section and deductions determined
by the commissioner to be similar to such deductions in accordance with
subparagraph (xiv) of paragraph b of subdivision one of this section,
the total aggregate amount of such deductions for each pay period shall
be subject to the following limitations: (i) such aggregate amount shall
not exceed a maximum aggregate limit established by the employer for
each pay period; (ii) such aggregate amount shall not exceed a maximum
aggregate limit established by the employee, which limit may be for any
amount (in ten dollar increments) up to the maximum amount established
by the employer under subparagraph (i) of this paragraph; (iii) the
employer shall not permit any purchases within these categories of
deduction by the employee that exceed the aggregate limit established by
the employee or, if no limit has been set by the employee, the limit set
by the employer; (iv) the employee shall have access within the
workplace to current account information detailing individual
expenditures within these categories of deduction and a running total of
the amount that will be deducted from the employee's pay during the next
applicable pay period. Information shall be available in printed form or
capable of being printed should the employee wish to obtain a listing.
No employee may be charged any fee, directly or indirectly, for access
to, or printing of, such account information.
  c. With the exception of wage deductions required or authorized in a
current existing collective bargaining agreement, an employee's
authorization for any and all wage deductions may be revoked in writing
at any time. The employer must cease the wage deduction for which the
employee has revoked authorization as soon as practicable, and, in no
event more than four pay periods or eight weeks after the authorization
has been withdrawn, whichever is sooner.
  * NB Effective until November 6, 2026
  * 3. Nothing in this section shall justify noncompliance with article
three-A of the personal property law relating to assignment of earnings,
nor with any other law applicable to deductions from wages.
  * NB Effective November 6, 2026
  * 4. Nothing in this section shall justify noncompliance with article
three-A of the personal property law relating to assignment of earnings,
with section two hundred twenty-one of this chapter relating to company
stores or with any other law applicable to deductions from wages.
  * NB Effective until November 6, 2026
  5. There is no exception to liability under this section for the
unauthorized failure to pay wages, benefits or wage supplements.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 184 cases (62 in the last 5 years), 1988–2026 · leading case: Epifani v. Johnson, 65 A.D.3d 224 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009).
Epifani v. Johnson, 65 A.D.3d 224 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009). · cites it 9× “At some point, $105 was allegedly discovered to be missing, and Johnson allegedly and illegally required Supple to reimburse her for the missing money in violation of Labor Law § 193. Additionally, after Johnson terminated Supple’s employment, Johnson allegedly and willfully…”
Gold v. New York Life Ins. Co., 2017 NY Slip Op 5695 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017). · cites it 14× “The second cause of action, asserted by all plaintiffs, alleged unlawful wage deductions for commission reversals in violation of Labor Law § 193. The third cause of action, which only plaintiffs Johnson and Kartal asserted, alleged failure to pay overtime in violation of 12…”
Ryan v. Kellogg Partners Institutional Servs., 968 N.E.2d 947 (NY 2012). · cites it 3× “” Truelove, who resigned after the first bonus installment payment was made, claimed that his employer violated Labor Law § 193 by enforcing an express condition in its bonus plan predicating payment of each quarterly installment *16 on continued employment.”
Marsh v. Prudential Sec. Inc., 802 N.E.2d 610 (NY 2003). · cites it 11× “The court determined that a payroll deduction that is invested in stock is similar to the deductions that are enumerated in Labor Law § 193 (1) (b) because the investment program benefits the employee and the withholdings provide the employee with favorable income tax…”
Hart v. Rick's Cabaret Int'l Inc., 967 F. Supp. 2d 901 (S.D.N.Y. 2013). · cites it 3× “” N.Y. Lab. Law § 193 (3). The NYLL and regulations thereunder authorize only discrete types of deductions from pay, such as for Social Security and income tax, or such deductions as authorized by the employee for the benefit of the employee.”
Hudacs v. Frito-Lay, Inc., 683 N.E.2d 322 (NY 1997). · cites it 10× “On June 9, 1989, the Commissioner of Labor issued an order to comply, charging that Frito-Lay’s practice violated Labor Law § 193. The order to comply covered 52 employees in the western New York area, including 10 employees represented by a Teamsters local.”
Pachter v. Bernard Hodes, 891 N.E.2d 279 (NY 2008). · cites it 3× “*614 After Pachter left her employment with Hodes in December 2003, she sued the company in federal court, claiming that Labor Law § 193—which prevents employers from making certain deductions from an employee's "wages"—prohibited Hodes from subtracting business expenses from…”
Gennes v. Yellow Book of New York, Inc., 23 A.D.3d 520 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005). · cites it 5× “In an action, inter alia, pursuant to Labor Law § 193 to recover wages wrongfully withheld and Labor Law § 198-c to recover vacation pay, the defendant appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Peck, J.”
Raparthi v. Clark, 2023 NY Slip Op 01757 (N.Y. App. Div. 2023). · cites it 4× “Defendant alleged that between February and June 2016, plaintiff Virupaksha Raparthi withheld commissions which were due to him.”
Koljenovic v. Marx, 999 F. Supp. 2d 396 (E.D.N.Y 2014). · cites it 7× “2d 322 (1997); N.Y. Lab. Law § 193 (1); see also Angello v.”
Angello v. Labor Ready, Inc., 859 N.E.2d 480 (NY 2006). · cites it 6× “Upon review, the Industrial Board of Appeals (IBA) found no violation of Labor Law § 193 (1). Determining that the CDM charge against the employee’s wages was a separate transaction under Labor Law § 193 (2), and entirely voluntary, the IBA found no violation.”
Truelove v. Ne. Capital & Advisory, Inc., 738 N.E.2d 770 (NY 2000). · cites it 2× “His complaint alleges that his bonus constituted “wages” within the meaning of Labor Law § 190 (1) and that, following his resignation after the first bonus payment, defendant violated Labor Law § 193 by enforcing an express condition in the bonus plan predicating payment of…”
— N.Y. Labor Law § 193(1) — 6 cases
Shapiro v. John T. Mather Hosp. of Port Jefferson, N.Y., Inc., 2022 NY Slip Op 05106 (N.Y. App. Div. 2022).
Frances v. Klein, 2024 NY Slip Op 05049 (N.Y. App. Div. 2024).
Okeke v. Interfaith Med. Ctr., 2024 NY Slip Op 00775 (N.Y. App. Div. 2024).
— N.Y. Labor Law § 193(1)(b) — 2 cases
Am. Infertility of N.Y., P.C. v. Kushnir, 2025 NY Slip Op 03858 (N.Y. App. Div. 2025).
Cummo v. Kerzner, 2025 NY Slip Op 31632(U) (N.Y. Sup. Ct., New York Cty. 2025).
— N.Y. Labor Law § 193(5) — 1 case
Ramirez v. Issa, 2026 NY Slip Op 00271 (N.Y. App. Div. 2026).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.