New York Consolidated Laws
N.Y. Labor Law § 517 (2026)
Remuneration
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
NY-LEGnysenate.gov
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
§ 517. Remuneration. 1. Inclusions. "Remuneration" means every form of compensation for employment paid by an employer to his employee; whether paid directly or indirectly by the employer, including salaries, commissions, bonuses, and the reasonable money value of board, rent, housing, lodging, or similar advantage received. Where gratuities are received by the employee in the course of his employment from a person other than his employer, the value of such gratuities shall be determined by the commissioner and be deemed and included as part of his remuneration paid by his employer. 2. Exclusions. Remuneration does not include: (a) The amount of any payment made to, or on behalf of, any employee or any of his dependents under a plan or system established by an employer which makes provision for his employees generally, or for such employees and their dependents, or for a class or classes of his employees, or for a class or classes of such employees and their dependents, including any amount paid by an employer for insurance or annuities, or into a fund, to provide for any such payment, on account of retirement, or sickness or accident disability, or medical or hospitalization expenses in connection with sickness or accident disability, or death. (b) Payment by an employer without deduction from the remuneration of the employee of the tax imposed upon an employee under the federal insurance contributions act. (c) Any payment made to an employee, including any amount paid by an employer for insurance or annuities, or into a fund, to provide for any such payment, on account of retirement. (d) Any payment on account of sickness or accident disability, or medical or hospitalization expenses in connection with sickness or accident disability, made by an employer to, or on behalf of, an employee after the expiration of six calendar months following the last calendar month in which the employee worked for such employer. (e) Any payment made to, or on behalf of, an employee or his beneficiary from or to a trust described in section four hundred one (a) of the federal internal revenue code which is exempt from tax under section five hundred one (a) of such code at the time of such payment unless such payment is made to an employee of the trust as remuneration for services rendered as such employee and not as a beneficiary of the trust, or under or to an annuity plan which, at the time of such payment, meets the requirements of section four hundred one (a) (3), (4), (5), and (6) of such code. (f) Compensation paid in any medium other than cash to an employee for service not in the course of the employer's trade or business. (g) Any payment, other than vacation or sick pay, made to an employee after the month in which he attains the age of sixty-five, if he did not work for the employer in the period for which such payment is made. (h) Dismissal payments. (i) Any payment made by an employer who is not liable for contributions under this article or for payments in lieu of contributions.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 26
cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1985–2024 · leading case: In re the Claim of Gruber, 674 N.E.2d 1354 (NY 1996).
In re the Claim of Gruber, 674 N.E.2d 1354 (NY 1996). “Employers of persons who provide services in the categories that are excluded from the statutory definition of employment are not obligated to make contributions to the unemployment insurance fund for those services (see, Labor Law § 517 [2] [i]; see also, Matter of Hollis Hills…”
In re the Claim of Rappaport, 144 A.D.2d 141 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988). “The Board reasoned that claimant’s vacation time was converted into additional sick leave under *142 the collective bargaining agreement and such sick leave benefits do not constitute remuneration under Labor Law § 517 (2) (a). Since claimant performed no services for the…”
In re the Claim of Sotomayor, 34 A.D.3d 957 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006). “The Board properly excluded from its calculations the compensation that claimant received as a foster parent as no taxes were withheld (see Labor Law § 517 [2] [b]) and claimant did not provide a breakdown of the amount purportedly paid to her for such services (see generally…”
In re the Claim of Terranova, 211 A.D.2d 847 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995). “February 1992, when claimant did file for benefits, he was found to have failed to register for benefits from December 10, 1990 through February 16, 1992, and to be ineligible to file a valid original claim at that latter date, based on the fact that he had neither been employed…”
In re the Claim of Woody, 139 A.D.2d 879 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988). “Further, pursuant to Labor Law § 517 (2) (h), dismissal pay is excluded as remuneration.”
In re the Claim of Jeffares, 9 A.D.3d 770 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004). “mployer’s characterization of the payments as salary (see Matter of Woody [Roberts], 139 AD2d 879, 880 [1988]), substantial evidence supports the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board’s conclusion that the money received by claimant constituted a severance package, which cannot be…”
In re the Claim of Baxter, 159 A.D.2d 845 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990). “Severance pay does not constitute remuneration (see, Labor Law § 517 [2] [h]). A period covered by severance pay payments is not "weeks of employment” (see, Matter of Rappaport [Town of Mamaroneck — Hartnett], 144 AD2d 141, 142 ).”
In re the Claim of Katz, 191 A.D.2d 865 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993). “Neither disability payments (see, Labor Law § 517 [2] [a]; Matter of Hines [Hartnett], 161 AD2d 909, 910 ) nor severance pay (see, Labor Law § 517 [2] [h]; Matter of Walker [Hartnett], supra, at 898; Matter of Woody [Roberts], 139 AD2d 879, 880 ) constitute remuneration for work…”
In re Preferred Comput. Trading Corp., 173 A.D.2d 1031 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991). “Instead the evidence indicates, as the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board found, that the money constituted remuneration for services Freund rendered (see, Labor Law § 517). For *1032 example, Freund testified that he "sleep[s], eat[s] and drink[s] the business”, yet he…”
In re the Claim of Kelley, 166 A.D.2d 822 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990). “[Ross], 78 AD2d 710 ), and that remuneration includes every form of compensation paid by an employer to an employee (Labor Law § 517). The narrow question presented here, however, is whether an individual who receives reimbursement expenses for performing volunteer work for a…”
In re the Claim of Bachuretz, 140 A.D.2d 785 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988). “The Board further concluded that such payment did not constitute remuneration for work for purposes of entitlement to unemployment insurance benefits pursuant to Labor Law § 517 (2) (a). The phrase "week of employment” is defined in Labor Law § 524 as "a week in which a claimant…”
In re the Claim of Hines, 161 A.D.2d 909 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990). “We find the Board’s determination that the payments received by claimant from his employer for the period June 3, 1985 to November 30, 1985, pursuant to the employer’s disability plan, do not constitute remuneration and the period covered by such payments does not constitute…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.