New York Consolidated Laws
N.Y. Labor Law § 593 (2026)
Disqualification for benefits
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
NY-LEGnysenate.gov
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
§ 593. Disqualification for benefits. 1. Voluntary separation; separation for a compelling family reason. (a) No weeks of total unemployment or partial unemployment shall be deemed to occur after a claimant's voluntary separation without good cause from employment until he or she has subsequently worked in employment and earned remuneration at least equal to ten times his or her weekly benefit rate. In addition to other circumstances that may be found to constitute good cause, including a compelling family reason as set forth in paragraph (b) of this subdivision, voluntary separation from employment shall not in itself disqualify a claimant if circumstances have developed in the course of such employment that would have justified the claimant in refusing such employment in the first instance under the terms of subdivision two of this section or if the claimant, pursuant to an option provided under a collective bargaining agreement or written employer plan which permits waiver of his or her right to retain the employment when there is a temporary layoff because of lack of work, has elected to be separated for a temporary period and the employer has consented thereto. (b) A claimant shall not be disqualified from receiving benefits for separation from employment due to any compelling family reason. For purposes of this paragraph, the term "compelling family reason" shall include, but not be limited to, separations related to any of the following: (i) domestic violence, verified by reasonable and confidential documentation which causes the individual reasonably to believe that such individual's continued employment would jeopardize his or her safety or the safety of any member of his or her immediate family. (ii) the illness or disability of a member of the individual's immediate family. For the purposes of this subparagraph: (A) The term "illness" means a verified illness which necessitates the care of the ill person for a period of time longer than the employer is willing to grant leave (paid or otherwise). (B) The term "disability" means a verified disability which necessitates the care of the disabled person for a period of time longer than the employer is willing to grant leave (paid or otherwise). "Disability" encompasses all types of disability, including: (1) mental and physical disability; (2) permanent and temporary disabilities; and (3) partial and total disabilities. (iii) the need for the individual to accompany such individual's spouse (A) to a place from which it is impractical for such individual to commute and (B) due to a change in location of the spouse's employment. * (iv) where the spouse of the individual is a member of the armed forces of the United States, the need for the individual to accompany such individual's spouse (A) to a place from which it is impractical for such individual to commute and (B) due to a change in location as a result of a military transfer of the spouse. * NB There are 2 sbpar (iv)'s * (iv) the need for the individual to provide child care to the individual's child if such individual has made reasonable efforts to secure alternative child care. * NB There are 2 sbpar (iv)'s (c) A disqualification as provided in this subdivision shall also apply after a claimant's voluntary separation from employment if such voluntary separation was due to claimant's marriage. 2. Refusal of employment. No weeks of total unemployment or partial unemployment shall be deemed to occur beginning with the week in which a claimant, without good cause, refuses to accept an offer of employment for which he or she is reasonably fitted by training and experience, including employment not subject to this article, until he or she has subsequently worked in employment and earned remuneration at least equal to ten times his or her weekly benefit rate. Except that claimants who are not subject to a recall date or who do not obtain employment through a union hiring hall and who are still unemployed after receiving ten weeks of benefits shall be required to accept any employment proffered that such claimants are capable of performing, provided that such employment would result in a wage not less than eighty percent of such claimant's high calendar quarter wages received in the base period and not substantially less than the prevailing wage for similar work in the locality as provided for in paragraph (d) of this subdivision. No refusal to accept employment shall be deemed without good cause nor shall it disqualify any claimant otherwise eligible to receive benefits if: (a) a refusal to accept employment which would interfere with a claimant's right to join or retain membership in any labor organization or otherwise interfere with or violate the terms of a collective bargaining agreement shall be with good cause; (b) there is a strike, lockout, or other industrial controversy in the establishment in which the employment is offered; or (c) the employment is at an unreasonable distance from his residence, or travel to and from the place of employment involves expense substantially greater than that required in his former employment unless the expense be provided for; or (d) the wages or compensation or hours or conditions offered are substantially less favorable to the claimant than those prevailing for similar work in the locality, or are such as tend to depress wages or working conditions; or (e) the claimant is seeking part-time work as provided in subdivision five of section five hundred ninety-six of this title and the offer of employment is not comparable to his or her part-time work as defined in such subdivision. 3. Misconduct. No weeks of total unemployment or partial unemployment shall be deemed to occur after a claimant lost employment through misconduct in connection with his or her employment until he or she has subsequently worked in employment and earned remuneration at least equal to ten times his or her weekly benefit rate. 4. Criminal acts. No weeks of total unemployment or partial unemployment shall be deemed to occur during a period of twelve months after a claimant loses employment as a result of an act constituting a felony in connection with such employment, provided the claimant is duly convicted thereof or has signed a statement admitting that he or she has committed such an act. Determinations regarding a benefit claim may be reviewed at any time. Any benefits paid to a claimant prior to a determination that the claimant has lost employment as a result of such act shall not be considered to have been accepted by the claimant in good faith. In addition, remuneration paid to the claimant by the affected employer prior to the claimant's loss of employment due to such criminal act may not be utilized for the purpose of establishing entitlement to a subsequent, valid original claim. The provisions of this subdivision shall apply even if the employment lost as a result of such act is not the claimant's last employment prior to the filing of his or her claim. 5. Terms of disqualification. A disqualification pursuant to the provisions of this section shall not be confined to a single benefit year. 6. Determinations and hearings. The commissioner shall issue a determination for any protest that is filed by any base period employer within the time specified in the notification of potential charges based on voluntary separations or misconduct. An employer or claimant may request a hearing of such determination pursuant to section six hundred twenty of this article.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 138
cases (28 in the last 5 years), 1951–2026 · leading case: In re the Claim of Gruber, 674 N.E.2d 1354 (NY 1996).
In re the Claim of Gruber, 674 N.E.2d 1354 (NY 1996). “Labor Law § 593 (1) provides that claimants will be disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits if they voluntarily separate without good cause from their "last employment” prior to the filing of an unemployment claim.”
Matter of Sinker (Sweeney), 678 N.E.2d 454 (NY 1997). “Central to this appeal is our interpretation of Labor Law § 593 (4), which disallows unemployment insurance benefits for a period of one year after a claimant loses his or her job as a result of an act constituting a felony "in connection with” that *487 employment.”
In re the Claim of Perdue, 47 A.D.3d 1139 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008). “ECI objected and, following a hearing, the Administrative Law Judge sustained the initial determination, finding that an employer-employee relationship existed and that claimant was not subject to the disqualification provision of Labor Law § 593 (1) (a).”
Hamilton v. Mount Sinai Hosp., 528 F. Supp. 2d 431 (S.D.N.Y. 2007). “Again, it is not necessary to determine whether preclusive effect should be given to this conclusion since it has no relevance to this case.”
In re the Claim of Guimarales, 503 N.E.2d 113 (NY 1986). “After an initial determination by the Department of Labor that claimant was ineligible for unemployment insurance benefits because she had lost her job due to "misconduct” (see, Labor Law § 593 [3]), a hearing was held before an Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) to determine…”
Torres v. New York State Dep't of Labor, 321 F. Supp. 432 (S.D.N.Y. 1971). “N.Y. Labor Law § 593 (McKinney 1965). Section 597(1) provides for initial determinations: "The validity of the claim and the amount of benefits payable to the claimant shall be determined in accordance with the regulations and procedure established by the commissioner and, when…”
In re the Claim of Di Maio, 12 A.D.3d 756 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004). “Consequently, the Court in that case held that the claimant, who was the chief title counsel to an abstract company, was disqualified under Labor Law § 593 (4) from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because he had submitted a false insurance claim to his insurance…”
Matter of Sheldon (Comm'r of Labor), 2017 NY Slip Op 6503 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017). ““Whether a claimant has voluntarily left employment for good cause is a factual determination to be made by the Board, and its decision will not be disturbed if supported by substantial evidence” (Matter of Campise [Commissioner of Labor], 150 AD3d 1523, 1524 [2017] [internal…”
Matter of Derfert (Comm'r of Labor), 2017 NY Slip Op 4016 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017). “To that end, and pursuant to Labor Law § 593 (1) (b) (i), the Legislature has provided that an employee may not be disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits for separating from employment “due to any compelling family reason,” which includes “domestic violence…”
In re the Claim of Guzenski, 20 A.D.3d 801 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005). “A claimant who refuses to accept a job for which he or she is reasonably suited by training and experience will be disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits (see Labor Law § 593 [2]; Matter of Spina [Commissioner of Labor], 7 AD3d 870, 870 [2004]; Matter of…”
In re the Claim of Spina, 7 A.D.3d 870 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004). “Labor Law § 593 (2) permits refusal of an offer of employment if, after receiving unemployment insurance benefits for 13 weeks, the wages are less than 80% of one’s high calendar quarter wages in the base period.”
In re the Claim of Maine, 282 A.D.2d 854 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001). “Furthermore, claimant’s earnings from his subsequent two-week employment with EAB Personnel Services were insufficient to break the disqualification caused by his voluntary separation from employment with the State Insurance Fund (see, Labor Law § 593 [1] [a]). Mercure, J. P.,…”
— N.Y. Labor Law § 593(3) — 1 case
Donovan v. Diplomat Envelope Corp., 587 F. Supp. 1417 (E.D.N.Y 1984).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.