New York Consolidated Laws
N.Y. Public Officers Law § 74 (2026)
Code of ethics
✓ text as retrieved May 2026 (this copy records no edition or section history)
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
NY-LEGnysenate.gov
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
§ 74. Code of ethics. 1. Definition. As used in this section: The term "state agency" shall mean any state department, or division, board, commission, or bureau of any state department or any public benefit corporation or public authority at least one of whose members is appointed by the governor or corporations closely affiliated with specific state agencies as defined by paragraph (d) of subdivision five of section fifty-three-a of the state finance law or their successors. The term "legislative employee" shall mean any officer or employee of the legislature but it shall not include members of the legislature. 2. Rule with respect to conflicts of interest. No officer or employee of a state agency, member of the legislature or legislative employee should have any interest, financial or otherwise, direct or indirect, or engage in any business or transaction or professional activity or incur any obligation of any nature, which is in substantial conflict with the proper discharge of his or her duties in the public interest. 3. Standards. a. No officer or employee of a state agency, member of the legislature or legislative employee should accept other employment which will impair his or her independence of judgment in the exercise of his or her official duties. b. No officer or employee of a state agency, member of the legislature or legislative employee should accept employment or engage in any business or professional activity which will require him or her to disclose confidential information which he or she has gained by reason of his or her official position or authority. c. No officer or employee of a state agency, member of the legislature or legislative employee should disclose confidential information acquired by him or her in the course of his or her official duties nor use such information to further his or her personal interests. d. No officer or employee of a state agency, member of the legislature or legislative employee should use or attempt to use his or her official position to secure unwarranted privileges or exemptions for himself or herself or others, including but not limited to, the misappropriation to himself, herself or to others of the property, services or other resources of the state for private business or other compensated non-governmental purposes. e. No officer or employee of a state agency, member of the legislature or legislative employee should engage in any transaction as representative or agent of the state with any business entity in which he or she has a direct or indirect financial interest that might reasonably tend to conflict with the proper discharge of his or her official duties. f. An officer or employee of a state agency, member of the legislature or legislative employee should not by his or her conduct give reasonable basis for the impression that any person can improperly influence him or her or unduly enjoy his or her favor in the performance of his or her official duties, or that he or she is affected by the kinship, rank, position or influence of any party or person. g. An officer or employee of a state agency should abstain from making personnel investments in enterprises which he or she has reason to believe may be directly involved in decisions to be made by him or her or which will otherwise create substantial conflict between his or her duty in the public interest and his or her private interest. h. An officer or employee of a state agency, member of the legislature or legislative employee should endeavor to pursue a course of conduct which will not raise suspicion among the public that he or she is likely to be engaged in acts that are in violation of his or her trust. i. No officer or employee of a state agency employed on a full-time basis nor any firm or association of which such an officer or employee is a member nor corporation a substantial portion of the stock of which is owned or controlled directly or indirectly by such officer or employee, should sell goods or services to any person, firm, corporation or association which is licensed or whose rates are fixed by the state agency in which such officer or employee serves or is employed. 4. Violations. In addition to any penalty contained in any other provision of law any such officer, member or employee who shall knowingly and intentionally violate any of the provisions of this section may be fined, suspended or removed from office or employment in the manner provided by law. Any such individual who knowingly and intentionally violates the provisions of paragraph b, c, d or i of subdivision three of this section shall be subject to a civil penalty in an amount not to exceed ten thousand dollars and the value of any gift, compensation or benefit received as a result of such violation. Any such individual who knowingly and intentionally violates the provisions of paragraph a, e or g of subdivision three of this section shall be subject to a civil penalty in an amount not to exceed the value of any gift, compensation or benefit received as a result of such violation.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 27
cases (4 in the last 5 years), 1985–2025 · leading case: In re the Arbitration Between Virginia Livermore-Johnson & New York State Dep't of Corr. & Cmty. Supervision, 155 A.D.3d 1391 (N.Y. App. Div. 3d Dep't 2017).
In re the Arbitration Between Virginia Livermore-Johnson & New York State Dep't of Corr. & Cmty. Supervision, 155 A.D.3d 1391 (N.Y. App. Div. 3d Dep't 2017). “should disclose confidential information acquired by him or her in the course of his or her official duties nor use such information to further his or her personal interests.”
Spence v. New York State Dep't of Agric. & Markets, 154 A.D.3d 1234 (N.Y. App. Div. 3d Dep't 2017). “Kulzer thereafter appealed the Department’s determination to respondent Commissioner of Agriculture and Markets and, in September 2014, the Commissioner upheld the disapproval on the ground that, among other things, Kulzer’s outside activities created the appearance of a…”
Matter of Klein v. New York State Jt. Commn. on Pub. Ethics, 214 A.D.3d 1096 (N.Y. App. Div. 3d Dep't 2023). “Respondent commenced an investigation as to whether petitioner, a former state senator, violated Public Officers Law § 74. A Hearing Officer rejected petitioner's procedural objections but nonetheless recommended dismissing the matter on the basis that Public Officers Law § 74…”
Flynn v. State Ethics Comm'n, 661 N.E.2d 991 (N.Y. 1995). “Additionally, Flynn was accused of violating Public Officers Law § 74 (3) CO, in that accepting the free admission while ultimately bearing responsibility for the approval of leases of the Armory resulted in an "impression that any person can improperly influence him or unduly…”
Cuomo v. New York State Commn. on Ethics & Lobbying in Govt., 271 N.E.3d 227 (N.Y. 2025). “In 2021, JCOPE notified plaintiff that he may have violated Public Officers Law § 74 (3) (a), (b), (c), (d), and (h), by "abus[ing] [his] State position for personal benefit, including but not limited to utilizing State property, personnel or other resources of the State for…”
Kastoff v. New York State Dep't of Soc. Servs., 195 A.D.2d 808 (N.Y. App. Div. 3d Dep't 1993). “Petitioner’s conduct in this matter is governed by Public Officers Law § 74 and the relevant DSS guidelines.”
Speers v. New York State Ethics Comm'n, 209 A.D.2d 919 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994). “Following petitioner’s appointment to the City of Buffalo Water Board, OSC sought an advisory opinion from respondent New York State Ethics Commission (hereinafter SEC) regarding whether petitioner’s service on the Water Board violated Public Officers Law § 74. The SEC…”
Meola v. Assessor of Colonie, 207 A.D.2d 593 (N.Y. App. Div. 3d Dep't 1994). “Meola’s law firm does not constitute a conflict of interest within the meaning of the Public Officers Law (see, Public Officers Law § 74 [2]). *595 Mercure, J.”
Rudder v. Pataki, 246 A.D.2d 183 (N.Y. App. Div. 3d Dep't 1998). “1 merely implemented the provisions of Public Officers Law § 74, the Court held that the order “is not an implementation of section 74; it is a nullification of it—a nullification, however benevolent in purpose, without benefit of legislative action” (id.”
Agosh v. Town of Cicero Bd. of Assessment Review, 150 Misc. 2d 756 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1991). “There being no express definition of the phrase "conflict of interest” in the statute referred to, petitioners point to sections that bar a public employee from accepting other employment that will impair his independence of judgment in the performance of his official duties…”
Davidson v. Oregon Gov't Ethics Comm'n, 702 P.2d 417 (Or. Ct. App. 1985). “313 (3) (1973); N.Y. Public Officers Law § 74 (3)(d) (McKinney Supp 1984); Pa.”
Spence v. N.Y.S. Dep't of Agric. & Mkts., 111 N.E.3d 307 (N.Y. 2018). “1 ; NY Public Officer Law § 74 ). Persons violating those types of rules face disciplinary proceedings and criminal prosecution (for example, Sheldon Silver, the former Speaker of the State Assembly, and Dean Skelos, the former State Senate majority leader, were charged with…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.