New York Consolidated Laws
N.Y. Public Officers Law § 87 (2026)
Access to agency records
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
NY-LEGnysenate.gov
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
§ 87. Access to agency records. 1. (a) Within sixty days after the effective date of this article, the governing body of each public corporation shall promulgate uniform rules and regulations for all agencies in such public corporation pursuant to such general rules and regulations as may be promulgated by the committee on open government in conformity with the provisions of this article, pertaining to the administration of this article. (b) Each agency shall promulgate rules and regulations, in conformity with this article and applicable rules and regulations promulgated pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (a) of this subdivision, and pursuant to such general rules and regulations as may be promulgated by the committee on open government in conformity with the provisions of this article, pertaining to the availability of records and procedures to be followed, including, but not limited to: i. the times and places such records are available; ii. the persons from whom such records may be obtained, and iii. except when a different fee is otherwise prescribed by statute: (1) the fees for paper copies of records shall not exceed twenty-five cents per photocopy not in excess of nine inches by fourteen inches, or the actual cost of reproducing any other record in accordance with the provisions of paragraph (c) of this subdivision. (2) In the case where an identical record has been prepared for a previous request within the past 6 months and an electronic copy is available, an agency shall not charge a fee for the reproduction of such record, except for the actual cost of a storage device or media if one is provided to the requester in complying with such request. (c) In determining the actual cost of reproducing a record, an agency may include only: i. an amount equal to the hourly salary attributed to the lowest paid agency employee who has the necessary skill required to prepare a copy of the requested record; ii. the actual cost of the storage devices or media provided to the person making the request in complying with such request; iii. the actual cost to the agency of engaging an outside professional service to prepare a copy of a record, but only when an agency's information technology equipment is inadequate to prepare a copy, if such service is used to prepare the copy; and iv. preparing a copy shall not include search time or administrative costs, and no fee shall be charged unless at least two hours of agency employee time is needed to prepare a copy of the record requested. A person requesting a record shall be informed of the estimated cost of preparing a copy of the record if more than two hours of an agency employee's time is needed, or if an outside professional service would be retained to prepare a copy of the record. 2. Each agency shall, in accordance with its published rules, make available for public inspection and copying all records, except those records or portions thereof that may be withheld pursuant to the exceptions of rights of access appearing in this subdivision. A denial of access shall not be based solely on the category or type of such record and shall be valid only when there is a particularized and specific justification for such denial. Each agency shall, in accordance with its published rules, make available for public inspection and copying all records, except that such agency may deny access to records or portions thereof that: (a) are specifically exempted from disclosure by state or federal statute; (b) if disclosed would constitute an unwarranted invasion of personal privacy under the provisions of subdivision two of section eighty-nine of this article; (c) if disclosed would impair present or imminent contract awards or collective bargaining negotiations; (d) are trade secrets or are submitted to an agency by a commercial enterprise or derived from information obtained from a commercial enterprise and which if disclosed would cause substantial injury to the competitive position of the subject enterprise; (e) are compiled for law enforcement purposes only to the extent that disclosure would: i. interfere with law enforcement investigations or judicial proceedings, provided however, that any agency, which is not conducting the investigation that the requested records relate to, that is considering denying access pursuant to this subparagraph shall receive confirmation from the law enforcement or investigating agency conducting the investigation that disclosure of such records will interfere with an ongoing investigation; ii. deprive a person of a right to a fair trial or impartial adjudication; iii. identify a confidential source or disclose confidential information relating to a criminal investigation; or iv. reveal criminal investigative techniques or procedures, except routine techniques and procedures; (f) if disclosed could endanger the life or safety of any person; (g) are inter-agency or intra-agency materials which are not: i. statistical or factual tabulations or data; ii. instructions to staff that affect the public; iii. final agency policy or determinations; iv. external audits, including but not limited to audits performed by the comptroller and the federal government; or (h) are examination questions or answers which are requested prior to the final administration of such questions. (i) if disclosed, would jeopardize the capacity of an agency or an entity that has shared information with an agency to guarantee the security of its information technology assets, such assets encompassing both electronic information systems and infrastructures; or * (j) are photographs, microphotographs, videotape or other recorded images prepared under authority of section eleven hundred eleven-a of the vehicle and traffic law. * NB Repealed December 1, 2027 * (k) are photographs, microphotographs, videotape or other recorded images prepared under authority of section eleven hundred eleven-b of the vehicle and traffic law. * NB Repealed December 1, 2029 * (k) are photographs, microphotographs, videotape or other recorded images prepared under authority of section eleven hundred eleven-b of the vehicle and traffic law. * NB Repealed December 1, 2029 * (l) are photographs, microphotographs, videotape or other recorded images produced by a bus lane photo device prepared under authority of section eleven hundred eleven-c of the vehicle and traffic law. * NB Repealed July 1, 2028 * (m) are photographs, microphotographs, videotape or other recorded images prepared under the authority of section eleven hundred eighty-b of the vehicle and traffic law. * NB Repealed July 1, 2030 * (n) are photographs, microphotographs, videotape or other recorded images prepared under authority of section eleven hundred eleven-d of the vehicle and traffic law. * NB Repealed December 1, 2029 * (o) are photographs, microphotographs, videotape or other recorded images prepared under authority of section eleven hundred eleven-e of the vehicle and traffic law. * NB Repealed December 1, 2029 (p) are data or images produced by an electronic toll collection system under authority of article forty-four-C of the vehicle and traffic law and in title three of article three of the public authorities law. * (q) are photographs, microphotographs, videotape or other recorded images prepared under authority of section eleven hundred seventy-four-a of the vehicle and traffic law. * NB Repealed December 1, 2029 * (r) are photographs, microphotographs, videotape or other recorded images prepared under the authority of section eleven hundred eighty-e of the vehicle and traffic law. * NB There are 3 par (r)'s * NB Repealed October 6, 2031 * (r) are photographs, microphotographs, videotape or other recorded images prepared under authority of section eleven hundred eleven-f of the vehicle and traffic law. * NB There are 3 par (r)'s * NB Repealed December 1, 2026 * (r) are photographs, microphotographs, videotape or other recorded images or information and data prepared under authority of section three hundred eighty-five-a of the vehicle and traffic law. * NB There are 3 par (r)'s * NB Repealed December 1, 2030 * (s) are photographs, microphotographs, videotape or other recorded images prepared under authority of section eleven hundred eleven-c-one of the vehicle and traffic law. * NB There are 3 par (s)'s * NB Repealed July 1, 2028 * (s) are photographs, microphotographs, videotape or other recorded images prepared under authority of section eleven hundred eleven-g of the vehicle and traffic law. * NB There are 3 par (s)'s * NB Repealed October 28, 2028 * (s) are photographs, microphotographs, videotape or other recorded images prepared under authority of section eleven hundred eighty-f of the vehicle and traffic law. * NB There are 3 par (s)'s * NB Repealed December 31, 2028 * (t) are photographs, microphotographs, videotape or other recorded images prepared under the authority of section eleven hundred eighty-f of the vehicle and traffic law. * NB There are 2 par (t)'s * NB Repealed December 31, 2028 * (t) are photographs, microphotographs, videotape or other recorded images prepared under authority of section eleven hundred eleven-g of the vehicle and traffic law. * NB There are 2 par (t)'s * NB Repealed December 1, 2027 * (u) are photographs, microphotographs, videotape or other recorded images prepared under the authority of section eleven hundred eighty-g of the vehicle and traffic law. * NB Repealed December 31, 2029 * NB There are 2 par (u)'s * (u) are photographs, microphotographs, videotape or other recorded images prepared under authority of section eleven hundred eleven-h of the vehicle and traffic law. * NB Repealed December 1, 2029 * NB There are 2 par (u)'s * (v) are photographs, microphotographs, videotape or other recorded images prepared under authority of section eleven hundred eleven-i of the vehicle and traffic law. * NB Repealed December 1, 2030 * NB There are 5 par (v)'s * (v) are photographs, microphotographs, videotape or other recorded images prepared under authority of section eleven hundred eighty-h of the vehicle and traffic law. * NB Repealed December 1, 2031 * NB There are 5 par (v)'s * (v) are photographs, microphotographs, videotape or other recorded images prepared under the authority of section eleven hundred eighty-h of the vehicle and traffic law. * NB Repealed December 31, 2030 * NB There are 5 par (v)'s * (v) are photographs, microphotographs, videotape or other recorded images prepared under the authority of section eleven hundred eighty-h of the vehicle and traffic law. * NB Repealed December 31, 2030 * NB There are 5 par (v)'s * (v) are photographs, microphotographs, videotape or other recorded images prepared under authority of section eleven hundred eleven-i of the vehicle and traffic law. * NB Repealed December 31, 2030 * NB There are 5 par (v)'s 3. Each agency shall maintain: (a) a record of the final vote of each member in every agency proceeding in which the member votes; (b) a record setting forth the name, public office address, title and salary of every officer or employee of the agency; and (c) a reasonably detailed current list by subject matter of all records in the possession of the agency, whether or not available under this article. Each agency shall update its subject matter list annually, and the date of the most recent update shall be conspicuously indicated on the list. Each state agency as defined in subdivision four of this section that maintains a website shall post its current list on its website and such posting shall be linked to the website of the committee on open government. Any such agency that does not maintain a website shall arrange to have its list posted on the website of the committee on open government. 4. (a) Each state agency which maintains records containing trade secrets, to which access may be denied pursuant to paragraph (d) of subdivision two of this section, shall promulgate regulations in conformity with the provisions of subdivision five of section eighty-nine of this article pertaining to such records, including, but not limited to the following: (1) the manner of identifying the records or parts; (2) the manner of identifying persons within the agency to whose custody the records or parts will be charged and for whose inspection and study the records will be made available; (3) the manner of safeguarding against any unauthorized access to the records. (b) As used in this subdivision the term "agency" or "state agency" means only a state department, board, bureau, division, council or office and any public corporation the majority of whose members are appointed by the governor. (c) Each state agency that maintains a website shall post information related to this article and article six-A of this chapter on its website. Such information shall include, at a minimum, contact information for the persons from whom records of the agency may be obtained, the times and places such records are available for inspection and copying, and information on how to request records in person, by mail, and, if the agency accepts requests for records electronically, by e-mail. This posting shall be linked to the website of the committee on open government. 4-a. A law enforcement agency responding to a request for law enforcement disciplinary records as defined in section eighty-six of this article shall redact any portion of such record containing the information specified in subdivision two-b of section eighty-nine of this article prior to disclosing such record under this article. 4-b. A law enforcement agency responding to a request for law enforcement disciplinary records, as defined in section eighty-six of this article, may redact any portion of such record containing the information specified in subdivision two-c of section eighty-nine of this article prior to disclosing such record under this article. 5. (a) An agency shall provide records on the medium requested by a person, if the agency can reasonably make such copy or have such copy made by engaging an outside professional service. Records provided in a computer format shall not be encrypted. (b) No agency shall enter into or renew a contract for the creation or maintenance of records if such contract impairs the right of the public to inspect or copy the agency's records. 6. All agencies subject to the requirements of this article shall develop a policy regarding providing a notification to public employees in the event that the agency is responding to a request for such employee's disciplinary records.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 774
cases (159 in the last 5 years), 1984–2026 · leading case: Matter of New York Civ. Liberties Union v. New York City Police Dept., 32 N.Y.3d 556 (NY 2018).
Matter of New York Civ. Liberties Union v. New York City Police Dept., 32 N.Y.3d 556 (NY 2018). “We disagree, and hold that the requested personnel records are exempt from disclosure pursuant to Public Officers Law § 87 (2) (a) and Civil Rights Law § 50-a.”
Gould v. New York City Police Dep't, 675 N.E.2d 808 (NY 1996). “However, insofar as the Criminal Procedure Law does not specifically preclude defendants from seeking these documents under FOIL, we cannot read such a categorical limitation into the statute ( see , Public Officers Law § 87 [2] [a]; accord , Matter of Farbman & Sons v New York…”
Friedman v. Rice, 90 N.E.3d 800 (2017). “identify a confidential source or disclose confidential information relating to a criminal investigation" ( Public Officers Law § 87[2][e][iii] ). We hold that a government agency may rely on this exemption only if the agency establishes (1) that an express promise of…”
Abdur-Rashid v. N.Y.C. Police Dep't, 100 N.E.3d 799 (2018). “In the context presented here, where a law enforcement agency was asked to disclose records relating to a police investigation and surveillance activities involving two specific individuals and associated organizations-information protected under the law enforcement and public…”
New York Times Co. v. New York State Exec. Chamber, 57 Misc. 3d 405 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 2017). “Between August 8, 2016 and October 5, 2016, the Executive Chamber (hereinafter the Chamber) denied all requests on the same grounds, specifically, Public Officers Law § 87 (2) (e). Petitioners took timely administrative appeals, and each denial was upheld, relying principally on…”
Matter of Markowitz v. Serio, 893 N.E.2d 110 (NY 2008). “This refusal was based on the Department's contention that Regulation 90 reports are exempt from disclosure or release under FOIL because their contents constitute either trade secrets or records that, if disclosed, "would cause substantial injury to the competitive position" of…”
City of Newark v. Law Dep't, 305 A.D.2d 28 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003). “” In addition, NYC made a blanket assertion that all responsive records were exempt from disclosure under either: (1) Public Officers Law § 87 (2) (a), as attorney-client communications, attorney work product, or material prepared for litigation; (2) Public Officers Law § 87 (2)…”
Lesher v. Hynes, 968 N.E.2d 451 (NY 2012). “” After considerable delay, the FOIL records access officer denied Lesher’s request on December 23, 2008, invoking Public Officers Law § 87 (2) (e) (i)-(iv), the law enforcement exemption, because the records sought “pertain[ed] to an open case in that a bench warrant was issued…”
Asian Am. Legal Def. & Educ. Fund v. New York City Police Dep't, 41 Misc. 3d 471 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 2013). “” (See Public Officers Law § 87 [2] [e] [i], [iii], [iv].”
Capital Newspapers Div. of the Hearst Corp. v. Burns, 496 N.E.2d 665 (NY 1986). “The City Hall Records Access Officer denied access to those records, contending that disclosure would constitute an unwarranted invasion of personal privacy (see, Public Officers Law § 87 [2] [b]; § 89 [2] [b]).”
Matter of Newsday, LLC v. Nassau Cnty. Police Dept., 2023 NY Slip Op 06050 (N.Y. App. Div. 2023). “FOIL provides that, unless otherwise specifically exempted, all records of a public agency are presumptively open to public inspection and copying ( see Public Officers Law § 87[2]; Matter of Gould v New York City Police Dept.”
Verizon New York, Inc. v. Bradbury, 40 A.D.3d 1113 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007). “), dated November 1, 2005, as granted that branch of the petition which was to determine that the exemption set forth in Public Officers Law § 87 (2) (c) was applicable to the requested documents and prohibited their disclosure until such time as Verizon New York, Inc.”
— N.Y. Public Officers Law § 87(1)(b) — 1 case
Liberty Mobility Link v. Port Auth. of N.Y. & N.J., 2024 NY Slip Op 33583(U) (N.Y. Sup. Ct., New York Cty. 2024).
— N.Y. Public Officers Law § 87(2) — 26 cases
Abdur-Rashid v. N.Y.C. Police Dep't, 100 N.E.3d 799 (2018). “In the context presented here, where a law enforcement agency was asked to disclose records relating to a police investigation and surveillance activities involving two specific individuals and associated organizations-information protected under the law enforcement and public…”
Matter of Newsday, LLC v. Nassau Cnty. Police Dept., 2023 NY Slip Op 06050 (N.Y. App. Div. 2023). “FOIL provides that, unless otherwise specifically exempted, all records of a public agency are presumptively open to public inspection and copying ( see Public Officers Law § 87[2]; Matter of Gould v New York City Police Dept.”
Matter of Tuckahoe Common Sch. Dist. v. Town of Southampton, 2020 NY Slip Op 418 (N.Y. App. Div. 2020).
Matter of Gruber v. Suffolk Cnty. Bd. of Elections, 2023 NY Slip Op 03864 (N.Y. App. Div. 2023).
Matter of Eckel v. Nassau Cnty., 2023 NY Slip Op 04667 (N.Y. App. Div. 2023).
— N.Y. Public Officers Law § 87(2)(a) — 13 cases
Aron v. Becker, 48 F. Supp. 3d 347 (N.D.N.Y. 2014).
Matter of Edmond v. Suffolk Cnty., 2021 NY Slip Op 05121 (N.Y. App. Div. 2021).
Matter of Xao He Lu v. Kings Cnty. Dist. Attorney, 2023 NY Slip Op 03470 (N.Y. App. Div. 2023).
Matter of NYP Holdings, Inc. v. New York City Dept. of Soc. Servs., 2024 NY Slip Op 32540(U) (N.Y. Sup. Ct., New York Cty. 2024).
Matter of Luongo v. Records Access Officer, 2018 NY Slip Op 3681 (N.Y. App. Div. 2018).
— N.Y. Public Officers Law § 87(2)(b) — 21 cases
Matter of Newsday, LLC v. Nassau Cnty. Police Dept., 2023 NY Slip Op 06050 (N.Y. App. Div. 2023). “FOIL provides that, unless otherwise specifically exempted, all records of a public agency are presumptively open to public inspection and copying ( see Public Officers Law § 87[2]; Matter of Gould v New York City Police Dept.”
Matter of Aron Law, PLLC v. New York City Fire Dept., 2021 NY Slip Op 00556 (N.Y. App. Div. 2021).
Matter of Lepper v. Vill. of Babylon, 2021 NY Slip Op 00174 (N.Y. App. Div. 2021).
Matter of Edmond v. Suffolk Cnty., 2021 NY Slip Op 05121 (N.Y. App. Div. 2021).
Matter of McFadden v. McDonald, 2022 NY Slip Op 02265 (N.Y. App. Div. 2022).
— N.Y. Public Officers Law § 87(2)(c) — 1 case
Liberty Mobility Link v. Port Auth. of N.Y. & N.J., 2024 NY Slip Op 33583(U) (N.Y. Sup. Ct., New York Cty. 2024).
— N.Y. Public Officers Law § 87(2)(d) — 3 cases
Matter of Jaskaran v. City of New York, 2021 NY Slip Op 06762 (N.Y. App. Div. 2021).
Matter of Jaskaran v. City of New York, 2021 NY Slip Op 06762 (N.Y. App. Div. 2021).
Matter of Pegram v. Metro. Transp. Auth., 2024 NY Slip Op 32350(U) (N.Y. Sup. Ct., New York Cty. 2024).
— N.Y. Public Officers Law § 87(2)(e) — 2 cases
Matter of Lane v. Port Wash. Police Dist., 2023 NY Slip Op 05605 (N.Y. App. Div. 2023).
Matter of Lane v. Cnty. of Nassau, 2026 NY Slip Op 01514 (N.Y. App. Div. 2026).
— N.Y. Public Officers Law § 87(2)(e)(i) — 11 cases
Friedman v. Rice, 90 N.E.3d 800 (2017). “identify a confidential source or disclose confidential information relating to a criminal investigation" ( Public Officers Law § 87[2][e][iii] ). We hold that a government agency may rely on this exemption only if the agency establishes (1) that an express promise of…”
Diocese of Buffalo v. Off. of the N.Y. State Attorney Gen., 2025 NY Slip Op 25147 (N.Y. Sup. Ct., New York Cty. 2025).
Matter of Crown Castle NG E., LLC v. Town of Hempstead, 2020 NY Slip Op 04940 (N.Y. App. Div. 2020).
Matter of Xao He Lu v. Kings Cnty. Dist. Attorney, 2023 NY Slip Op 03470 (N.Y. App. Div. 2023).
Matter of Sarkodie v. Kings Cnty. Dist. Attorney, 2024 NY Slip Op 00908 (N.Y. App. Div. 2024).
— N.Y. Public Officers Law § 87(2)(e)(iii) — 1 case
Friedman v. Rice, 90 N.E.3d 800 (2017). “identify a confidential source or disclose confidential information relating to a criminal investigation" ( Public Officers Law § 87[2][e][iii] ). We hold that a government agency may rely on this exemption only if the agency establishes (1) that an express promise of…”
— N.Y. Public Officers Law § 87(2)(e)(iv) — 1 case
Matter of Lane v. Port Wash. Police Dist., 2023 NY Slip Op 05605 (N.Y. App. Div. 2023).
— N.Y. Public Officers Law § 87(2)(f) — 8 cases
Matter of Lane v. Port Wash. Police Dist., 2023 NY Slip Op 05605 (N.Y. App. Div. 2023).
Matter of Barletta v. Martuscello, 2024 NY Slip Op 50834(U) (N.Y. Sup. Albany 2024).
Matter of Barletta v. Martuscello, 2024 NY Slip Op 50834(U) (N.Y. Sup. Albany 2024).
Matter of Burns v. Cooke, 2020 NY Slip Op 07190 (N.Y. App. Div. 2020).
Ctr. for Appellate Litig. v. New York Cnty. Dist. Attorney's Off., 2024 NY Slip Op 31910(U) (N.Y. Sup. Ct., New York Cty. 2024).
— N.Y. Public Officers Law § 87(2)(g) — 12 cases
Friedman v. Rice, 90 N.E.3d 800 (2017). “identify a confidential source or disclose confidential information relating to a criminal investigation" ( Public Officers Law § 87[2][e][iii] ). We hold that a government agency may rely on this exemption only if the agency establishes (1) that an express promise of…”
Matter of Aron Law, PLLC v. New York City Fire Dept., 2021 NY Slip Op 00556 (N.Y. App. Div. 2021).
Matter of Eckel v. Nassau Cnty., 2023 NY Slip Op 04667 (N.Y. App. Div. 2023).
Matter of Lockwood v. Cnty. of Suffolk, 2023 NY Slip Op 04316 (N.Y. App. Div. 2023).
Matter of Pegram v. Metro. Transp. Auth., 2024 NY Slip Op 32350(U) (N.Y. Sup. Ct., New York Cty. 2024).
— N.Y. Public Officers Law § 87(2)(g)(i) — 1 case
Matter of Suffern Educ. Assn. v. Bd. of Educ. of the Suffern Cent. Sch. Dist., 2023 NY Slip Op 00873 (N.Y. App. Div. 2023).
— N.Y. Public Officers Law § 87(2)(g)(iii) — 1 case
Matter of Law Off. of Cyrus Joubin, Esq. v. New York City Dept. of Corr., 2024 NY Slip Op 32165(U) (N.Y. Sup. Ct., New York Cty. 2024).
— N.Y. Public Officers Law § 87(2)(i) — 1 case
Matter of Freedom Found. v. New York City Dept. of Citywide Admin. Servs., 2024 NY Slip Op 04483 (N.Y. App. Div. 2024).
— N.Y. Public Officers Law § 87(5)(b) — 1 case
Matter of Pegram v. Metro. Transp. Auth., 2024 NY Slip Op 32350(U) (N.Y. Sup. Ct., New York Cty. 2024).
— N.Y. Public Officers Law § 87(e)(iv) — 1 case
Matter of McFadden v. McDonald, 2022 NY Slip Op 02265 (N.Y. App. Div. 2022).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.