New York Consolidated Laws

N.Y. Penal Law § 155.05 (2026)

Larceny; defined

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NY-LEGnysenate.gov Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
§ 155.05 Larceny; defined.
  1. A person steals property and commits larceny when, with intent to
deprive another of property or to appropriate the same to himself or to
a third person, he wrongfully takes, obtains or withholds such property
from an owner thereof.
  2. Larceny includes a wrongful taking, obtaining or withholding of
another's property, with the intent prescribed in subdivision one of
this section, committed in any of the following ways:
  (a) By conduct heretofore defined or known as common law larceny by
trespassory taking, common law larceny by trick, embezzlement, or
obtaining property by false pretenses;
  (b) By acquiring lost property.
  A person acquires lost property when he exercises control over
property of another which he knows to have been lost or mislaid, or to
have been delivered under a mistake as to the identity of the recipient
or the nature or amount of the property, without taking reasonable
measures to return such property to the owner;
  (c) By committing the crime of issuing a bad check, as defined in
section 190.05;
  (d) By false promise.
  A person obtains property by false promise when, pursuant to a scheme
to defraud, he obtains property of another by means of a representation,
express or implied, that he or a third person will in the future engage
in particular conduct, and when he does not intend to engage in such
conduct or, as the case may be, does not believe that the third person
intends to engage in such conduct.
  In any prosecution for larceny based upon a false promise, the
defendant's intention or belief that the promise would not be performed
may not be established by or inferred from the fact alone that such
promise was not performed. Such a finding may be based only upon
evidence establishing that the facts and circumstances of the case are
wholly consistent with guilty intent or belief and wholly inconsistent
with innocent intent or belief, and excluding to a moral certainty every
hypothesis except that of the defendant's intention or belief that the
promise would not be performed;
  (e) By extortion.
  A person obtains property by extortion when he compels or induces
another person to deliver such property to himself or to a third person
by means of instilling in him a fear that, if the property is not so
delivered, the actor or another will:
  (i) Cause physical injury to some person in the future; or
  (ii) Cause damage to property; or
  (iii) Engage in other conduct constituting a crime; or
  (iv) Accuse some person of a crime or cause criminal charges or
removal proceedings to be instituted against him or her; or
  (v) Expose a secret or publicize an asserted fact, whether true or
false, tending to subject some person to hatred, contempt or ridicule;
or
  (vi) Cause a strike, boycott or other collective labor group action
injurious to some person's business; except that such a threat shall not
be deemed extortion when the property is demanded or received for the
benefit of the group in whose interest the actor purports to act; or
  (vii) Testify or provide information or withhold testimony or
information with respect to another's legal claim or defense; or
  (viii) Use or abuse his position as a public servant by performing
some act within or related to his official duties, or by failing or
refusing to perform an official duty, in such manner as to affect some
person adversely; or
  (ix) Perform any other act which would not in itself materially
benefit the actor but which is calculated to harm another person
materially with respect to such other person's health, safety, business,
calling, career, financial condition, reputation or personal
relationships;or
  (f) By wage theft.
  A person obtains property by wage theft when such person hires a
person to perform services and the person performs such services and the
person does not pay wages, at the minimum wage rate and overtime, or
promised wage, if greater than the minimum wage rate and overtime, to
said person for work performed. In a prosecution for wage theft, for the
purposes of venue, it is permissible to aggregate all nonpayments or
underpayments to one person from one person, into one larceny count,
even if the nonpayments or underpayments occurred in multiple counties.
It is also permissible to aggregate nonpayments or underpayments from a
workforce into one larceny count even if such nonpayments or
underpayments occurred in multiple counties; or
  (g) By deed theft. A person commits deed theft when such person:
  (i) Intentionally alters, falsifies, forges, or misrepresents any
written instrument involved in the conveyance or financing of real
property, such as a residential or commercial deed or title, with the
intent to deceive, defraud, or unlawfully transfer or encumber the
ownership rights or a portion thereof of a residential or commercial
property; or
  (ii) with intent to defraud, misrepresents themselves as the owner or
authorized representative of residential or commercial real property to
induce others to rely on such false information in order to obtain
ownership or possession of such real property; or
  (iii) with intent to defraud, takes, obtains, or transfers title or
ownership of real property by fraud, misrepresentation, forgery,
larceny, false pretenses, false promise, or any other fraudulent or
deceptive practice.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 447 cases (39 in the last 5 years), 1972–2026 · leading case: People v. Norman, 650 N.E.2d 1303 (NY 1995).
People v. Norman, 650 N.E.2d 1303 (NY 1995). · cites it 40× “At the close of the evidence, the trial court, echoing the language of Penal Law § 155.05 (2) (d), instructed the jury on the elements of larceny by false promise and the special burden of proof associated with that crime.”
People v. Jennings, 69 N.Y.2d 103 (NY 1986). · cites it 6× “As one commentator has noted, the concepts of "deprive” and "appropriate,” which "are essential to a definition of larcenous intent,” "connote a purpose * * * to exert permanent or virtually permanent control over the property taken, or to cause permanent or virtually permanent…”
People v. Jensen, 654 N.E.2d 1237 (NY 1995). · cites it 6× “"A person steals property and commits larceny when, with intent to deprive another of property or to appropriate the same to himself or a third person, he wrongfully takes, obtains or withholds such property from an owner thereof" (Penal Law § 155.05 [1]). The intent to…”
People v. Foster, 541 N.E.2d 1 (NY 1989). · cites it 14× “The People urge that this conduct falls literally within the definition of larceny found in subdivision (1) of Penal Law § 155.05, which states: "A person steals property and commits larceny when, with intent to deprive another of property or to appropriate the same to himself…”
People v. DeDeo, 59 A.D.3d 846 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009). · cites it 2× “With regard to the charge of scheme to defraud, it was necessary for the prosecution to establish “a systematic ongoing course of conduct with intent to defraud more than one person or to obtain property from more than one person by false or fraudulent pretenses, representations…”
The People v. Lawrence P. Frumusa, 79 N.E.3d 495 (NY 2017). ““To ‘deprive’ another of property means (a) to withhold it or cause it to be withheld from him permanently or for so extended a period or under such circumstances that the major portion of its economic value or benefit is lost to him, or (b) to dispose of the property in such…”
United States v. Kirsch, 903 F.3d 213 (2d Cir. 2018). · cites it 3× “" See N.Y. Penal Law §§ 155.05 , 155.40 (McKinney 1967).”
People v. Green, 841 N.E.2d 289 (NY 2005). · cites it 3× “The current larceny statute provides simply that “[a] person steals property and commits larceny when, with intent to deprive another of property or to appropriate the same to himself or to a third person, he wrongfully takes, obtains or withholds such property from an owner…”
People v. Cantoni, 140 A.D.3d 782 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016). “larcenous intent,” which means “the ‘intent to deprive another of property or to appropriate the same to himself or to a third person’ ” (People v Medina, 18 NY3d 98, 103 [2011], quoting Penal Law § 155.05 [1]; see Penal Law § 160.”
Bouveng v. NYG Capital LLC, 175 F. Supp. 3d 280 (S.D.N.Y. 2016). · cites it 2× “erty to himself or to a third person by means of instilling in him a fear that, if the property is not so delivered, the actor or another will: (iv) Accuse some person of a crime or cause criminal charges to be instituted against him; or (v) Expose a secret or publicize an…”
United States v. Ivezaj, 568 F.3d 88 (2d Cir. 2009). · cites it 2× “Defendants argue that even if control over an illegal gambling business could be extorted under New York law, defendants did not “obtain” this property because it was never “delivered” to them.”
Dawkins v. Williams, 511 F. Supp. 2d 248 (N.D.N.Y. 2007). · cites it 8× “” N.Y. Penal Law § 155.05 (2)(e)(v) [emphasis added].”
— N.Y. Penal Law § 155.05(1) — 5 cases
Tsesarskaya v. City of New York, 843 F. Supp. 2d 446 (S.D.N.Y. 2012).
United States v. Arena, 918 F. Supp. 561 (N.D.N.Y. 1996).
Ballard v. Walker, 772 F. Supp. 1335 (E.D.N.Y 1991).
Matter of Parisi, 2020 NY Slip Op 1349 (N.Y. App. Div. 2020).
United States v. Thrower (2d Cir. 2009).
— N.Y. Penal Law § 155.05(2) — 1 case
Katzoff v. BSP Agency, LLC, 2025 NY Slip Op 30946(U) (N.Y. Sup. Ct., New York Cty. 2025).
— N.Y. Penal Law § 155.05(2)(d) — 1 case
People v. Luongo, 86 Misc. 120 (1976).
— N.Y. Penal Law § 155.05(2)(e) — 2 cases
Reisner v. Stoller, 51 F. Supp. 2d 430 (S.D.N.Y. 1999).
Kraft Gen. Foods, Inc. v. Cattell, 18 F. Supp. 2d 280 (S.D.N.Y. 1998).
— N.Y. Penal Law § 155.05(2)(e)(1) — 2 cases
United States v. Ivezaj, 568 F.3d 88 (2d Cir. 2009). “Defendants argue that even if control over an illegal gambling business could be extorted under New York law, defendants did not “obtain” this property because it was never “delivered” to them.”
— N.Y. Penal Law § 155.05(e) — 1 case
New York Transp., Inc. v. Naples Transp., Inc., 116 F. Supp. 2d 382 (E.D.N.Y 2000).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.