New York Consolidated Laws
N.Y. Penal Law § 155.05 (2026)
Larceny; defined
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
NY-LEGnysenate.gov
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
§ 155.05 Larceny; defined. 1. A person steals property and commits larceny when, with intent to deprive another of property or to appropriate the same to himself or to a third person, he wrongfully takes, obtains or withholds such property from an owner thereof. 2. Larceny includes a wrongful taking, obtaining or withholding of another's property, with the intent prescribed in subdivision one of this section, committed in any of the following ways: (a) By conduct heretofore defined or known as common law larceny by trespassory taking, common law larceny by trick, embezzlement, or obtaining property by false pretenses; (b) By acquiring lost property. A person acquires lost property when he exercises control over property of another which he knows to have been lost or mislaid, or to have been delivered under a mistake as to the identity of the recipient or the nature or amount of the property, without taking reasonable measures to return such property to the owner; (c) By committing the crime of issuing a bad check, as defined in section 190.05; (d) By false promise. A person obtains property by false promise when, pursuant to a scheme to defraud, he obtains property of another by means of a representation, express or implied, that he or a third person will in the future engage in particular conduct, and when he does not intend to engage in such conduct or, as the case may be, does not believe that the third person intends to engage in such conduct. In any prosecution for larceny based upon a false promise, the defendant's intention or belief that the promise would not be performed may not be established by or inferred from the fact alone that such promise was not performed. Such a finding may be based only upon evidence establishing that the facts and circumstances of the case are wholly consistent with guilty intent or belief and wholly inconsistent with innocent intent or belief, and excluding to a moral certainty every hypothesis except that of the defendant's intention or belief that the promise would not be performed; (e) By extortion. A person obtains property by extortion when he compels or induces another person to deliver such property to himself or to a third person by means of instilling in him a fear that, if the property is not so delivered, the actor or another will: (i) Cause physical injury to some person in the future; or (ii) Cause damage to property; or (iii) Engage in other conduct constituting a crime; or (iv) Accuse some person of a crime or cause criminal charges or removal proceedings to be instituted against him or her; or (v) Expose a secret or publicize an asserted fact, whether true or false, tending to subject some person to hatred, contempt or ridicule; or (vi) Cause a strike, boycott or other collective labor group action injurious to some person's business; except that such a threat shall not be deemed extortion when the property is demanded or received for the benefit of the group in whose interest the actor purports to act; or (vii) Testify or provide information or withhold testimony or information with respect to another's legal claim or defense; or (viii) Use or abuse his position as a public servant by performing some act within or related to his official duties, or by failing or refusing to perform an official duty, in such manner as to affect some person adversely; or (ix) Perform any other act which would not in itself materially benefit the actor but which is calculated to harm another person materially with respect to such other person's health, safety, business, calling, career, financial condition, reputation or personal relationships;or (f) By wage theft. A person obtains property by wage theft when such person hires a person to perform services and the person performs such services and the person does not pay wages, at the minimum wage rate and overtime, or promised wage, if greater than the minimum wage rate and overtime, to said person for work performed. In a prosecution for wage theft, for the purposes of venue, it is permissible to aggregate all nonpayments or underpayments to one person from one person, into one larceny count, even if the nonpayments or underpayments occurred in multiple counties. It is also permissible to aggregate nonpayments or underpayments from a workforce into one larceny count even if such nonpayments or underpayments occurred in multiple counties; or (g) By deed theft. A person commits deed theft when such person: (i) Intentionally alters, falsifies, forges, or misrepresents any written instrument involved in the conveyance or financing of real property, such as a residential or commercial deed or title, with the intent to deceive, defraud, or unlawfully transfer or encumber the ownership rights or a portion thereof of a residential or commercial property; or (ii) with intent to defraud, misrepresents themselves as the owner or authorized representative of residential or commercial real property to induce others to rely on such false information in order to obtain ownership or possession of such real property; or (iii) with intent to defraud, takes, obtains, or transfers title or ownership of real property by fraud, misrepresentation, forgery, larceny, false pretenses, false promise, or any other fraudulent or deceptive practice.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 447
cases (39 in the last 5 years), 1972–2026 · leading case: People v. Norman, 650 N.E.2d 1303 (NY 1995).
People v. Norman, 650 N.E.2d 1303 (NY 1995). “At the close of the evidence, the trial court, echoing the language of Penal Law § 155.05 (2) (d), instructed the jury on the elements of larceny by false promise and the special burden of proof associated with that crime.”
People v. Jennings, 69 N.Y.2d 103 (NY 1986). “As one commentator has noted, the concepts of "deprive” and "appropriate,” which "are essential to a definition of larcenous intent,” "connote a purpose * * * to exert permanent or virtually permanent control over the property taken, or to cause permanent or virtually permanent…”
People v. Jensen, 654 N.E.2d 1237 (NY 1995). “"A person steals property and commits larceny when, with intent to deprive another of property or to appropriate the same to himself or a third person, he wrongfully takes, obtains or withholds such property from an owner thereof" (Penal Law § 155.05 [1]). The intent to…”
People v. Foster, 541 N.E.2d 1 (NY 1989). “The People urge that this conduct falls literally within the definition of larceny found in subdivision (1) of Penal Law § 155.05, which states: "A person steals property and commits larceny when, with intent to deprive another of property or to appropriate the same to himself…”
People v. DeDeo, 59 A.D.3d 846 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009). “With regard to the charge of scheme to defraud, it was necessary for the prosecution to establish “a systematic ongoing course of conduct with intent to defraud more than one person or to obtain property from more than one person by false or fraudulent pretenses, representations…”
The People v. Lawrence P. Frumusa, 79 N.E.3d 495 (NY 2017). ““To ‘deprive’ another of property means (a) to withhold it or cause it to be withheld from him permanently or for so extended a period or under such circumstances that the major portion of its economic value or benefit is lost to him, or (b) to dispose of the property in such…”
United States v. Kirsch, 903 F.3d 213 (2d Cir. 2018). “" See N.Y. Penal Law §§ 155.05 , 155.40 (McKinney 1967).”
People v. Green, 841 N.E.2d 289 (NY 2005). “The current larceny statute provides simply that “[a] person steals property and commits larceny when, with intent to deprive another of property or to appropriate the same to himself or to a third person, he wrongfully takes, obtains or withholds such property from an owner…”
People v. Cantoni, 140 A.D.3d 782 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016). “larcenous intent,” which means “the ‘intent to deprive another of property or to appropriate the same to himself or to a third person’ ” (People v Medina, 18 NY3d 98, 103 [2011], quoting Penal Law § 155.05 [1]; see Penal Law § 160.”
Bouveng v. NYG Capital LLC, 175 F. Supp. 3d 280 (S.D.N.Y. 2016). “erty to himself or to a third person by means of instilling in him a fear that, if the property is not so delivered, the actor or another will: (iv) Accuse some person of a crime or cause criminal charges to be instituted against him; or (v) Expose a secret or publicize an…”
United States v. Ivezaj, 568 F.3d 88 (2d Cir. 2009). “Defendants argue that even if control over an illegal gambling business could be extorted under New York law, defendants did not “obtain” this property because it was never “delivered” to them.”
Dawkins v. Williams, 511 F. Supp. 2d 248 (N.D.N.Y. 2007). “” N.Y. Penal Law § 155.05 (2)(e)(v) [emphasis added].”
— N.Y. Penal Law § 155.05(1) — 5 cases
Tsesarskaya v. City of New York, 843 F. Supp. 2d 446 (S.D.N.Y. 2012).
United States v. Arena, 918 F. Supp. 561 (N.D.N.Y. 1996).
Ballard v. Walker, 772 F. Supp. 1335 (E.D.N.Y 1991).
Matter of Parisi, 2020 NY Slip Op 1349 (N.Y. App. Div. 2020).
United States v. Thrower (2d Cir. 2009).
— N.Y. Penal Law § 155.05(2) — 1 case
Katzoff v. BSP Agency, LLC, 2025 NY Slip Op 30946(U) (N.Y. Sup. Ct., New York Cty. 2025).
— N.Y. Penal Law § 155.05(2)(d) — 1 case
People v. Luongo, 86 Misc. 120 (1976).
— N.Y. Penal Law § 155.05(2)(e) — 2 cases
Reisner v. Stoller, 51 F. Supp. 2d 430 (S.D.N.Y. 1999).
Kraft Gen. Foods, Inc. v. Cattell, 18 F. Supp. 2d 280 (S.D.N.Y. 1998).
— N.Y. Penal Law § 155.05(2)(e)(1) — 2 cases
United States v. Ivezaj, 568 F.3d 88 (2d Cir. 2009). “Defendants argue that even if control over an illegal gambling business could be extorted under New York law, defendants did not “obtain” this property because it was never “delivered” to them.”
United States v. Rudaj (Ivezaj) (2d Cir. 2009).
— N.Y. Penal Law § 155.05(e) — 1 case
New York Transp., Inc. v. Naples Transp., Inc., 116 F. Supp. 2d 382 (E.D.N.Y 2000).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.