New York Consolidated Laws

N.Y. Penal Law § 158.00 (2026)

Definitions; presumption; limitation

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NY-LEGnysenate.gov Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
§ 158.00 Definitions; presumption; limitation.
  1. Definitions. The following definitions are applicable to this
article:
  (a) "Public benefit card" means any medical assistance card, food
stamp assistance card, public assistance card, or any other
identification, authorization card or electronic access device issued by
the state or a social services district, as defined in subdivision seven
of section two of the social services law, which entitles a person to
obtain public assistance benefits under a local, state, or federal
program administered by the state, its political subdivisions, or social
services districts.
  (b) "Fraudulent welfare act" means knowingly and with intent to
defraud, engaging in an act or acts pursuant to which a person:
  (1) offers, presents or causes to be presented to the state, any of
its political subdivisions or social services districts, or any employee
or agent thereof, an oral or written application or request for public
assistance benefits or for a public benefit card with knowledge that the
application or request contains a false statement or false information,
and such statement or information is material, or
  (2) holds himself or herself out to be another person, whether real or
fictitious, for the purpose of obtaining public assistance benefits, or
  (3) makes a false statement or provides false information for the
purpose of (i) establishing or maintaining eligibility for public
assistance benefits or (ii) increasing or preventing reduction of public
assistance benefits, and such statement or information is material.
  (c) "Public assistance benefits" means money, property or services
provided directly or indirectly through programs of the federal
government, the state government or the government of any political
subdivision within the state and administered by the department of
social services or social services districts.
  2. Rebuttable presumption. (a) A person who possesses five or more
public benefit cards in a name or names other than his or her own is
presumed to possess the same with intent to defraud, deceive or injure
another.
  (b) The presumption established by this subdivision shall not apply
to:
  (1) any employee or agent of the department of social services to the
extent that he or she possesses such cards in the course of his or her
official duties; or
  (2) any person to the extent that he she possesses a public benefit
card or cards issued to a member or members of his or her immediate
family or household with the consent of the cardholder; or
  (3) any person providing home health services or personal care
services pursuant to title eleven of article five of the social services
law, or any agent or employee of a congregate care or residential
treatment facility or foster care provider, to the extent that in the
course of his or her duties, he or she possesses public assistance cards
issued to persons under his or her care.
  (c) The presumption established by this subdivision is rebuttable by
evidence tending to show that the defendant did not possess such public
benefit card or cards with intent to defraud, deceive or injure another.
In any action tried before a jury, the jury shall be so instructed.
  (d) The foregoing presumption shall apply to prosecutions for criminal
possession of public benefit cards.
  3. Limitation. Nothing contained in this article shall be construed to
prohibit a recipient of public assistance benefits from pledging his or
her public assistance benefits or using his or her public benefit card
as collateral for a loan.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1999–2025 · leading case: People v. Bailey, 915 N.E.2d 611 (NY 2009).
People v. Bailey, 915 N.E.2d 611 (NY 2009). · cites it 2× “Penal Law § 158.00 [2] [a] [relates to welfare fraud—"A person who possesses five or more public benefit cards in a name or names other than his or her own is presumed to possess the same with intent to defraud, deceive or injure another"]; Penal Law § 235.”
People v. Davis, 2017 NY Slip Op 7800 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017). · cites it 3× “In other words, the People interpret the statute such that the requirement that the funds be administered through a social services agency applies only to funds provided by “any political subdivision within the state” (Penal Law § 158.00 [1] [c]). We note that the People’s…”
People v. Cutten, 182 Misc. 2d 531 (1999). “Similarly, section 65-c does not contain any “presumptions” which might lay the statutory foundation for a “constructive possession” (compare, for example, Penal Law § 158.00 [2]; §§ 170.71, 190.10, 220.”
Matter of Mantilla v. New York City Dept. of Hous. Preserv. & Dev., 2025 NY Slip Op 07079 (NY 2025). · cites it 2× “16 [b] [5] [same]; Penal Law §§ 158.00 [b]-[c]; 158.15 [welfare fraud]).”
People v. Laumeyer, 10 Misc. 3d 184 (2005). · cites it 2× “Here the defendant argues that since count I charging welfare fraud in the third degree alleges that the fraudulent act comprised a number of acts over a period of time from May 2002 through February 2005, it is contrary to the statute because by definition a fraudulent welfare…”
People v. Nicholas, 106 A.D.3d 1026 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013). “Penal Law § 158.00 [1] [c]). Accordingly, the evidence does not support the defendant’s conviction of criminal possession of stolen property in the fourth degree under counts one and two of the indictment.”
People v. Nicholas, 106 A.D.3d 1026 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013). “Penal Law § 158.00 [1] [c]). Accordingly, the evidence does not support the defendant’s conviction of criminal possession of stolen property in the fourth degree under counts one and two of the indictment.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.