New York Consolidated Laws
N.Y. Penal Law § 190.80 (2026)
Identity theft in the first degree
✓ text as retrieved May 2026 (this copy records no edition or section history)
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
NY-LEGnysenate.gov
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
§ 190.80 Identity theft in the first degree. A person is guilty of identity theft in the first degree when such person knowingly and with intent to defraud assumes the identity of another person by presenting themself as that other person, or by acting as that other person or by using personal identifying information of that other person, and thereby: 1. obtains goods, money, property or services or uses credit in the name of such other person in an aggregate amount that exceeds two thousand dollars; or 2. causes financial loss to such person or to another person or persons in an aggregate amount that exceeds two thousand dollars; or 3. commits or attempts to commit a class D felony or higher level crime or acts as an accessory in the commission of a class D or higher level felony; or 4. commits the crime of identity theft in the second degree as defined in section 190.79 of this article and has been previously convicted within the last five years of identity theft in the third degree as defined in section 190.78, identity theft in the second degree as defined in section 190.79, identity theft in the first degree as defined in this section, unlawful possession of personal identification information in the third degree as defined in section 190.81, unlawful possession of personal identification information in the second degree as defined in section 190.82, unlawful possession of personal identification information in the first degree as defined in section 190.83, unlawful possession of a skimmer device in the second degree as defined in section 190.85, unlawful possession of a skimmer device in the first degree as defined in section 190.86, grand larceny in the fourth degree as defined in section 155.30, grand larceny in the third degree as defined in section 155.35, grand larceny in the second degree as defined in section 155.40 or grand larceny in the first degree as defined in section 155.42 of this chapter. Identity theft in the first degree is a class D felony.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 37
cases (4 in the last 5 years), 2008–2024 · leading case: People v. Roberts, 31 N.Y.3d 406 (2018).
People v. Roberts, 31 N.Y.3d 406 (2018). “The jury thereafter convicted Rush of one count each of identity theft in the first degree (Penal Law § 190.80 [3]) and criminal possession of a forged instrument in the second degree (Penal Law § 170.”
People v. Destin, 150 A.D.3d 76 (N.Y. App. Div. 1st Dep't 2017). “, the bank’s *78 “personal identifying information” (see Penal Law § 190.80), the defendant implicitly assumed the identity of the bank (see Barden, 117 AD3d at 220).”
People v. Barden, 117 A.D.3d 216 (N.Y. App. Div. 1st Dep't 2014). “or services or uses credit in the name of such other person in an aggregate amount that exceeds two thousand dollars” (Penal Law § 190.80 [1]). There are, accordingly, three methods by which an individual can assume another’s identity under the statute: a defendant might (1)…”
People v. Yuson, 133 A.D.3d 1221 (N.Y. App. Div. 4th Dep't 2015). “Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon a jury verdict of two counts each of identity theft in the first degree (Penal Law § 190.80 [3]) and criminal possession of a forged instrument in the second degree (§ 170.”
People v. Smith, 139 A.D.3d 131 (N.Y. App. Div. 1st Dep't 2016). “Defendant was charged in a nine-count indictment with identity theft in the first degree (Penal Law § 190.80 [3]), forgery in the second degree (Penal Law § 170.”
People v. McDonnell, 201 A.D.3d 951 (N.Y. App. Div. 2d Dep't 2022). “The defendant was convicted under distinct subdivisions of the statute, each requiring proof of an additional fact ( see Penal Law § 190.80[1], [2]; CPL 200.30[2]; People v Alonzo , 16 NY3d 267, 269-271 ; People v Ayala , 172 AD3d 1084 , 1084; Matter of Lavon S.”
People v. Rush, 148 A.D.3d 1601 (N.Y. App. Div. 4th Dep't 2017). “*1602 Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting her upon a jury verdict of identity theft in the first degree (Penal Law § 190.80 [3]) and criminal possession of a forged instrument in the second degree (§ 170.”
People v. Whitehead, 84 A.D.3d 1128 (N.Y. App. Div. 2d Dep't 2011). “ively to each other for the convictions under count 12 of the indictment, identity theft in the first degree, and count 14 of the indictment, attempted grand larceny in the second degree, was improper, as the defendant’s attempt to steal a vehicle constituted attempted grand…”
People v. Box, 145 A.D.3d 1510 (N.Y. App. Div. 4th Dep't 2016). “Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him, following a jury trial, of identity theft in the first degree (Penal Law § 190.80 [1]) and falsifying business records in the first degree (§ 175.”
People v. Rosario, 41 Misc. 3d 392 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 2013). “Background and Procedural History Defendant was indicted on January 8, 2013, for the crimes of identity theft in the first degree pursuant to Penal Law § 190.80 (2) (two counts); grand larceny in the third degree pursuant Penal Law § 155.”
People v. Ogunmekan, 95 A.D.3d 701 (N.Y. App. Div. 1st Dep't 2012). “The counts at issue set forth every element of the crime of identity theft in the first degree (Penal Law § 190.80 [1]). Therefore, they were not jurisdictionally defective (see People v D’Angelo, 98 NY2d 733, 735 [2002]; People v Ray, 71 NY2d 849, 850 [1988]).”
People v. Scott, 85 A.D.3d 481 (N.Y. App. Div. 1st Dep't 2011). “As defendant concedes, he did not preserve for appellate review his contention that the trial evidence was insufficient to establish that he assumed the identity of another and thereby committed or attempted to commit a D felony or higher level crime (Penal Law § 190.80 [3]),…”
N.Y. Penal Law § 190.80(1): 1 case
Matter of Lynch, 2019 NY Slip Op 4385 (N.Y. App. Div. 2d Dep't 2019).
N.Y. Penal Law § 190.80(2): 2 cases
Silas v. The City of New York, No. 1:18-cv-07122 (E.D.N.Y. Aug. 28, 2023).
People v. Rosario, 2019 NY Slip Op 8006 (N.Y. App. Div. 1st Dep't 2019).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.