New York Consolidated Laws
N.Y. Penal Law § 220.44 (2026)
Criminal sale of a controlled substance in or near school grounds
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
NY-LEGnysenate.gov
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
§ 220.44 Criminal sale of a controlled substance in or near school grounds. A person is guilty of criminal sale of a controlled substance in or near school grounds when he knowingly and unlawfully sells: 1. a controlled substance in violation of any one of subdivisions one through six-a of section 220.34 of this article, when such sale takes place upon school grounds or on a school bus; or 2. a controlled substance in violation of any one of subdivisions one through eight of section 220.39 of this article, when such sale takes place upon school grounds or on a school bus; or 3. a controlled substance in violation of any one of subdivisions one through six of section 220.34 of this article, when such sale takes place upon the grounds of a child day care or educational facility under circumstances evincing knowledge by the defendant that such sale is taking place upon such grounds; or 4. a controlled substance in violation of any one of subdivisions one through eight of section 220.39 of this article, when such sale takes place upon the grounds of a child day care or educational facility under circumstances evincing knowledge by the defendant that such sale is taking place upon such grounds. 5. For purposes of subdivisions three and four of this section, "the grounds of a child day care or educational facility" means (a) in or on or within any building, structure, athletic playing field, a playground or land contained within the real property boundary line of a public or private child day care center as such term is defined in paragraph (c) of subdivision one of section three hundred ninety of the social services law, or nursery, pre-kindergarten or kindergarten, or (b) any area accessible to the public located within one thousand feet of the real property boundary line comprising any such facility or any parked automobile or other parked vehicle located within one thousand feet of the real property boundary line comprising any such facility. For the purposes of this section an "area accessible to the public" shall mean sidewalks, streets, parking lots, parks, playgrounds, stores and restaurants. 6. For the purposes of this section, a rebuttable presumption shall be established that a person has knowledge that they are within the grounds of a child day care or educational facility when notice is conspicuously posted of the presence or proximity of such facility. Criminal sale of a controlled substance in or near school grounds is a class B felony.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 38
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1979–2021 · leading case: People v. Brown, 769 N.E.2d 1266 (NY 2002).
People v. Brown, 769 N.E.2d 1266 (NY 2002). “Because the site of the transaction was within 1,000 feet of two schools, defendant was charged in an indictment with, among other counts, criminal sale of a controlled substance in or near school grounds (Penal Law § 220.44 [2]). In his opening remarks to the jury, defense…”
People v. Gonzalez, 781 N.E.2d 894 (NY 2002). “39 [1]) and criminal sale of a controlled substance in or near school grounds (Penal Law § 220.44 [2]) based on a single drug transaction.”
Brown v. Alexander, 543 F.3d 94 (2d Cir. 2008). “It included one count of criminal sale of a controlled substance in or near school grounds in violation of N.Y. Penal Law § 220.44 (2). Voir dire of the jury took place in Supreme Court, Bronx County, before Justice Robert H.”
People v. Alexander, 970 N.E.2d 409 (NY 2012). “39 [1]) and criminal sale of a controlled substance in or near school grounds (Penal Law § 220.44 [2]); while in jail awaiting trial, defendant filed numerous pro se motions and habeas corpus petitions.”
Joseph Bellavia v. Walter Fogg, Warden, Green Haven Corr. Facility, Stormville, New York, 613 F.2d 369 (2d Cir. 1979). “Based on the foregoing evidence, including the presumption of possession, appellant was found guilty of selling a dangerous drug in the first degree, N.Y. Penal Law § 220.44 (now § 220.43), criminal possession of a dangerous drug in the first degree, N.”
People v. Gaines, 167 Misc. 2d 923 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1996). “In this case of first impression, the question before the court is whether this alleged sale, which was negotiated on the sidewalk and in which the transfer of the drugs and money took place in an apartment house lobby, falls within the conduct proscribed in Penal Law § 220.44…”
People v. Lopez, 831 N.E.2d 413 (NY 2005). “In a felony complaint, the pair was charged with criminal sale of a controlled substance in or near school grounds and criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree in violation of Penal Law § 220.44 (2) and § 220.39 (1). After indictment, defendant and the…”
People v. Godreality Way, 69 A.D.3d 964 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010). “osecu *965 tion (see People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620, 621 [1983]), we find that it was legally sufficient to prove, beyond a reasonable doubt, that on three separate occasions the defendant knowingly and unlawfully sold narcotic drugs upon the grounds of a child day care center…”
People v. Rexach, 220 A.D.2d 362 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995). “We reject defendant’s claim that he was improperly adjudicated a second felony offender because his prior Federal conviction for distributing cocaine within 1,000 feet of a public school was based on a statute ( 21 USC § 841 [a] [1]; former § 845a [a], now § 860 [a]) that is…”
People v. Robbins, 840 N.E.2d 1020 (NY 2005). “Penal Law § 220.44 (2) proscribes the third-degree criminal sale of a controlled substance “when such sale takes place upon school grounds.”
Urena v. Lape, 373 F. Supp. 2d 449 (S.D.N.Y. 2005). “89 (1), and criminal sale of a controlled substahce in or near school grounds, in violation of N.Y. Penal Law § 220.44 (2). He was sentenced, as a second felony offender, to concurrent, indeterminate prison terms of four and one-half to nine years on each count.”
People v. Ruffin, 101 A.D.3d 1793 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012). “Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment convicting Mm upon his plea of guilty of criminal sale of a controlled substance in or near school grounds (Penal Law § 220.44 [2]), defendant contends in his main brief that his plea allocution was not factually sufficient.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.